hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
Related Articles
-
sand liquefaction modelling in Anura3D
Beginner level question for this forum – Trying to replace a Mohr-Coulomb model of sand in an Anura3D simulation with a material model which accurately describes sand liquefaction. References I’ve […] -
Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model
Dear all, I require to use Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model in ABAQUS for which I need to write a subroutine. Kindly let me know if you can help, thank […] -
New features in Excalibre
Hi all, We are happy to announce that the Excalibre team received support from the research grant GACR 22-12178S to further develop the calibration software, which is freely available at […] -
Problem with SANISAND UMAT
Hello all, I’m using the SANISAND UMAT I downloaded here for my research, the problem I found is it gives me wrong results in ABAQUS and INCREMENTAL DRIVER for element […] -
Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND
I cannot find sanisand in the library of available constitutive models for the triaxial test driver, even if it is listed as one of the available models on the main […] -
-
“Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
Hello Everyone, I am using the UMAT code for clay hypoplasticity provided by Prof. Masin — https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxis-umat-hypoplas-zip/ I made a test model in Abaqus2020 and applied the umat code (umat_hcea.for). […] -
Hypoplastic UMAT & Void Ratio
Hi all, Can anyone give a clarification on the material property (parameter 22) in the hypopplasticity umat for clay on Abaqus. My understanding is that these parameters are defined as […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.