hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
Related Articles
-
need help in Flac3d6
dear user hello i intend to build a numerical model using flac3d 6 software i build the geometry with extrusion pane and set all values for pile – soil interaction […] -
-
Suggestions for an Advanced Constitutive Model in FEM-Based Dynamic Slope Stability Analysis
Dear colleagues, I am planning to conduct a dynamic stability analysis of a slope using the finite element method (FEM). I intend to implement the analysis through coding and utilize […] -
Animating Soil Models – eLearning Project
Dear all, I am currently writing a proposal for a (small & hopefully nice) eLearning project: Within the project, I would like to create animations related to constitutive modelling. I […] -
Modelling Rate-dependent behaviour of clay [Urgent]
Using PLAXIS, how to model rate dependent behavior of clay. This is to show the viscous behavior of the soil. Thank you in advance -
Challenges in simulating geomechanical models using Mohr-Coulomb with Tension Cut-Off in Abaqus
I am modelling an underground cavern for Compressed Air Energy Storage applications using Abaqus. To begin, I attempted to replicate the results presented in the provided paper: Damasceno, DR, Spross, […] -
Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
Hi to everyone I want to model a Sand with Cap plasticity or Drucker Prager failure criterion in ABAQUS, and I have the result of Triaxial test (I’ve attached the […] -
New features in Excalibre
Hi all, We are happy to announce that the Excalibre team received support from the research grant GACR 22-12178S to further develop the calibration software, which is freely available at […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Animating Soil Mechanics 3.7.2026
-
GeoXPM 19.6.2026
-
Autumn School in Soil Modelling at NTNU 16.6.2026
-
Viscohypoplastic bentonite (VIBE) model 28.5.2026
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.