hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
Related Articles
-
Input files for element tests for hypoplastic clay/sand UMAT
I’m interested in using the model for simulating excavations in clay, where the small strain modulus is important, and the analysis has to be transient consolidation. It would be helpful […] -
NorSand model for cyclic triaxial testing
Hi altruists, Hope all of you are doing well. I am looking for literature on the NorSand model, which considers the drained cyclic triaxial testing behavior. I have found a […] -
Modelling Rate-dependent behaviour of clay [Urgent]
Using PLAXIS, how to model rate dependent behavior of clay. This is to show the viscous behavior of the soil. Thank you in advance -
-
Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
Dear all, does anyone have the umat code for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus? For my current work I need a umat for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus. It would be highly […] -
hypoplasticity umat filr
hello every one i have a problem with abaqus subroutine can i use hypoplastic umat file that prepared for palxis in this website in abaqus? or the files must be […] -
consistent tangent stiffness calculation in hypoplasticity sand UMAT
Dear all, Thanks for hypoplasticity sand UMAT provided by Prof. Masin. During studying hypo sand UMAT, I am encountered with a question about consistent tangent stiffness calculation. subroutine ”perturbate_h“ seems […] -
Who is Online
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
FE formulation and software 25.3.2023
-
Multi-objective analysis of the Sand Hypoplasticity model calibration 24.3.2023
-
Problem with SANISAND UMAT 7.3.2023
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 (22nd – 23rd of May) with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Yannis Dafalias 28.2.2023
-
What is an appropriate damping model for dynamic liquefaction analysis of tailings storage facility in FLAC? 10.2.2023
-
Abaqus vs Plaxis – Local Convergence Tolerances 2.2.2023
-
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
-
New features in Excalibre 17.1.2023
-
Sanisand 13.1.2023
-
SaniSand Model in Plaxis 3D 9.12.2022
-
The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws 2.12.2022
-
Abaqus OneAPI Compiler 10.11.2022
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.