hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
Related Articles
-
Hypoplastic UMAT error ABAQUS
Hi all, I wanted to ask if anyone has experienced this error before when running the Hypoplastic UMAT (umat_hcea.for) on Abaqus? “Abaqus Error: The executable standard.exe aborted with system error […] -
Oedometer test simulation with “Sand Hypoplasticity Model” in Plaxis
Hi, I just came across some problems with the implementation of the “Sand Hypoplasticity Model” in Plaxis. I wanted to to perform a simulation of an oedometer test on a […] -
Non-local regularization: Need VUMAT of Mohr-Coulomb model in abaqus
Dear Community, I want to include a non-local regularization technique in the built-in Mohr-Coulomb model of abaqus to capture the strain-localization effects. I am trying to find the original VUMAT […] -
VUMAT ABAQUS: sandy soil
Dear PhD, I am studying roller vibrations on sandy soil models with vumat. Can PhD give me the subroutine model and input parameters of objects for reference? Unit of the […] -
Subroutine of SANISAND model
I am trying use sanisand subroutine posted in this website. But it is not working. Getting no values for field variable in the odb. I think i am missing something. […] -
Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
Hi David, I have reproduced some single elements test on ABAQUS using the UMAT to compare with Triax Hypoplasticity. So far, my stiffness curve (q vs ea) and my stress […] -
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […] -
Triaxial Callibration test with Hypoplasticity
Dear all I am trying to calibrate the HP for sand, and I have quite comprehensive data. but they are not totally consistent with each other . we have the […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Intergranular strain concept modification 29.3.2020
-
PhD position on thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling in slope stability (Charles University) 26.2.2020
-
PhD position at Charles University on experimental investigation of thermally loaded bentonite 24.2.2020
-
How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine 18.2.2020
-
Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soil-monopile interaction 7.2.2020
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.