hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
Related Articles
-
SImulation with hypoplastic model for granular materials in ABAQUS
Hello, I want to use the hypoplastic model for granular materials downloaded from https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxis-umat-hypoplas-zip. The UMAT file umat.for is the model for sand. I followed the instruction https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html. I have […] -
Hypoplastic rate independent and non-linearity
Dear all I’m studying hypo-plastic constitutive law from beginning concepts I traced concepts successfully until i faced **rate independent topic** i read this topic in the prof. Wolfgangs paper (hypo-plasticity […] -
Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soil-monopile interaction
Dear all, I am trying to model soil-monopile interaction (3D) in ABAQUS/Standard in order to perform subsequently a cyclic and dynamic analysis. For the soil I am using the SANISAND […] -
ALERT Geomaterials – SoilModels support declaration
ALERT Geomaterials (The Alliance of Laboratories in Europe for Education, Research and Technology) is a European organisation including 33 Universities or Organisations, which are most active in the field of numerical […] -
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […] -
SANISAND 2008 Model
Hello Everyone, Can anyone have umat available for SANISAND 08 (Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model)?. Paper authored by Taiebat and Dafalias. They have used a closed type yield surface. Regards […] -
ExCalibre Automatic Calibration
Hello all, i have another question regarding the calibration process. Why do the initial void ratios differ between the input file and the output from excalibre? What is done during […] -
Hypoplasticity & Recent Stress History
Hi David, Can you please provide some comments on the ability of the Hypoplasticity model with intergranular strain concept to model the effects of recent stress history on the clay […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
-
K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
-
Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
-
Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog 11.2.2021
-
Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model 8.2.2021
-
Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading 8.2.2021
-
Guidance for a newbie 6.2.2021
-
Modelling Rate-dependent behaviour of clay [Urgent] 1.2.2021
-
Postdoctoral Fellowship in computational geomechanics 27.1.2021
-
USDM – Creep -SCLAY1S 25.1.2021
-
Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus 25.1.2021
-
Effects of water content in sand in hypoplastic strength parameters 25.1.2021
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.