hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
abaqus version
Related Articles
-
Dynamic Compaction Simulation by ABAQUS
shenouda Mekhail||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 4,616
Greeting Everyone, I’m a new user of ABAQUS. I’m trying to simulate soil dynamic compaction by Cap model. I simulated the blow by half sinusoidal wave. Although I used Cap […] -
Hypoplastic sand-mr parameter calibration
anis kheffache||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,211
Dear all, I have a question about Hypoplasticity for sand model, i am having trouble to understand about how to calibrate the mr parameter ? Since no formula is provided […] -
Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
Abulimiti Ayizula||Constitutive Modelling|5 |Views 5,592
Is there Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus? -
Hypoplastcity sand model
Pooja Patil||Constitutive Modelling|11 |Views 4,555
Not able to run the subroutine ……..error is coming ……UMAT: illegal (negative) actual void ratio detected Can anybody help -
-
Triaxial Callibration test with Hypoplasticity
pooyan ghasemi||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,109
Dear all I am trying to calibrate the HP for sand, and I have quite comprehensive data. but they are not totally consistent with each other . we have the […] -
Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
Balaji Bandaru||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 5,274
Soft soil and soft soil creep model both include time while performing the analysis. What is the difference between both of them. -
Calibration Sand Hypoplasticity whit ExCalibre
Francisco Mendez||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,252
Dear all I have some laboratory test of Pescara sand and I’m trying to find the von Wolffersdorff parameters of this sand. So I have used ExCalibre with the data […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
- Connecting remote sensors to the Plaxis FEM 3D using python 26.7.2024
- Intergranular Strain Extensions 16.7.2024
- Abaqus Hypoplasticity Primary Variable Is Not Available 1.7.2024
- Vumat to calculate excess pore in Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian ABAQUS 1.7.2024
- Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model 20.6.2024
- Soil model for sand under drained cyclic loading 15.6.2024
- In Abaqus how do we use *DLOAD for defining both user-defined pressure and body force simultaneously? 15.6.2024
- Issue in applying SANISAND04 UMAT to Boundary-Value-Problem 31.5.2024
- Triaxial compression test using Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus 27.5.2024
- The Mises stress calculated by the hypoplasticity model considering the intergranular strain is all 0 20.5.2024
- Degradation ( disturbance ) of hypoplastic clay 23.4.2024
- Degradation ( disturbance ) of hypoplastic clay 23.4.2024
Recent Comments
- Ismail Khan on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Tao Zhu on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Lei DAI on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Yu Xiao on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
- Yu Xiao on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
- Charbel NOHRA on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
- Pouya Zahedi on UMAT for hypoplastic subroutine
- Mohsen Misaghian on SANISAND umat issue
- Ashesh Choudhury on Abaqus
- Hu Shihong on Triaxial compression test using Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus
- Mert Eyupgiller on Triaxial compression test using Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus
- Bala Harsha Srusti on ABAQUS job doesn’t make any increment
- PRATIK GOEL on Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
- Ashraf AHMED on ExCalibre – SoilModels Automatic Calibration
- Xy Ma on Sand and clay standard datasets
- Xy Ma on Sand and clay standard datasets
- Ramon Varghese on Hypoplastic Interface Model: Does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D
- Jh Xue on UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines)
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.