hi every one
i’m using abaqus 2017
and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D)
and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully
my question is that my abaqus version is suitable for subroutine؟
or i have to change my abaqus version?
Related Articles
-
NorSand model for cyclic triaxial testing
Hi altruists, Hope all of you are doing well. I am looking for literature on the NorSand model, which considers the drained cyclic triaxial testing behavior. I have found a […] -
ExCalibre Automatic Calibration
Hello all, i have another question regarding the calibration process. Why do the initial void ratios differ between the input file and the output from excalibre? What is done during […] -
Hypoplastic Intergranular vs Triaxial Data
Hi David, I am trying to reproduce some Triaxial data from Coop et al. (1995) using the Hypoplastic Model with Intergranular Strain Concept on Triax. So far, I cannot get […] -
consistent tangent stiffness calculation in hypoplasticity sand UMAT
Dear all, Thanks for hypoplasticity sand UMAT provided by Prof. Masin. During studying hypo sand UMAT, I am encountered with a question about consistent tangent stiffness calculation. subroutine ”perturbate_h“ seems […] -
Hypoplastic model for Granular soil
Hello everyone, Could you please anyone tell me that how I can define the hypoplastic constitutive model for granular soil in ABAQUS 6.13. With Regards, Naveen. -
UMAT file for POROELASTICITY
Anyone has any reference to writing UMAT file for Poro linear elastic properties or what constitutive equations have to be solved to do the same. Any help would be appreciated […] -
FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity interface
Dear Prof Stutz and Prof Mašín, Is FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity available? If yes, could you please provide me with the link to download FRIC? Thank you Haran -
Error in abaqus when use sanisand
Hi everyone When I use sanisand model in abaqus , This error is seen Can anyone help? Other subroutines work well for me Is it possible for my input parameters […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
SaniClay or SaniClay-RD 30.9.2026
-
Animating Soil Mechanics 3.7.2026
-
GeoXPM 19.6.2026
-
Autumn School in Soil Modelling at NTNU 16.6.2026
-
Viscohypoplastic bentonite (VIBE) model 28.5.2026
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
Hi Sobhan,
If you have succesfully linked Intel Fortran Compiler and MS Visual Studio to your Abaqus 2017 version and have “PASSED” messages when doing the verifications, then you should be able to run the UMAT in your analyses, irrespective of the version of Abaqus.
thank you so much!
Usually it is never an issue with the Abaqus version. The only thing that happens from time to time is that they slightly change the names of the variables in the header of the subroutines. But this I have so far only seen for some not really common subroutines. For UMATs it is not the issue for the last years/versions.