Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles

Abaqus user defined field
Van DoanConstitutive Modelling2 Views 309
Hi, I am going to use the usdfld to function the density of sand changing due to confining pressure. I am not sure Abaqus will call the usdfld for every […] 
Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
Abulimiti AyizulaConstitutive Modelling1 Views 139
Is there Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus? 
Cyclic Behavior of Sand
MOHD SAQIBConstitutive Modelling3 Views 153
Hello, Is there any constitutive model for sand which can simulate the number of cycles to reach the critical state. I used the SANISAND model but it is not promising. […] 
Modelling Ratedependent behaviour of clay [Urgent]
Balaji BandaruConstitutive Modelling0 Views 100
Using PLAXIS, how to model rate dependent behavior of clay. This is to show the viscous behavior of the soil. Thank you in advance 
SImulation with hypoplastic model for granular materials in ABAQUS
yusheng yangConstitutive Modelling2 Views 229
Hello, I want to use the hypoplastic model for granular materials downloaded from https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxisumathypoplaszip. The UMAT file umat.for is the model for sand. I followed the instruction https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html. I have […] 
Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
MOHD SAQIBConstitutive Modelling2 Views 241
Hello Everyone, I have been trying to simulate the cyclic triaxial test using the SANISAND04 subroutine. When I plotting the stress path (pq plot), I am getting only the positive […] 
SANISAND pilesoilinteraction ABAQUS
Lee Jae SungConstitutive Modelling1 Views 271
Hi everyone: I am trying to use SANISAND as the constitutive model of soil, and use ABAQUS software to simulate pilesoil interaction. First step is “Geostatic”, the second step is […] 
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Marco HoferConstitutive Modelling3 Views 373
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
 K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
 Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
 Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog 11.2.2021
 Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model 8.2.2021
 Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading 8.2.2021
 Guidance for a newbie 6.2.2021
 Modelling Ratedependent behaviour of clay [Urgent] 1.2.2021
 Postdoctoral Fellowship in computational geomechanics 27.1.2021
 USDM – Creep SCLAY1S 25.1.2021
 Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus 25.1.2021
 Effects of water content in sand in hypoplastic strength parameters 25.1.2021
Recent Comments
 Mehdi Joneidi on A problem of convergence from using Hypoplastic model in Abaqus
 Mehdi Joneidi on Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading
 Mehdi Joneidi on Kadlíček, T. and Mašín, D. (2020). The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics (in print)
 David Mašín on Kadlíček, T. and Mašín, D. (2020). The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics (in print)
 Mehdi Joneidi on Kadlíček, T. and Mašín, D. (2020). The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics (in print)
 Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
 Eduardo Muguet on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Subroutine of SANISAND model
 Sudipta Bhowmick on SANISAND (Dafalias and Manzari, 2004)
 Osama Dar on Guidance for a newbie
 Arie Koot on Seismic Liquifaction
 Emrecan Güven on Guidance for a newbie
 Osama Dar on Guidance for a newbie
 Gertraud Medicus on Guidance for a newbie
 Juan Tello on Clay hypoplasticity with strength reduction (umat and Plaxis dll).
 Juan Tello on UMAT Implementation of Sand Hypoplasticity by UIBK
 Micha Van der Sloot on PLAXIS
 Micha Van der Sloot on USDM – Creep SCLAY1S
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards