Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles

Cyclic/monotonic direct shear test (matlab driver)
anis kheffacheConstitutive Modelling2 Views 2,227
Hi everyone, i am trying to simulate DSS/cDSS test in drained/undrained conditions and I was wondering how the constraints matrices should be ? while it is easy to understand how […] 

How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
Sudipta BhowmickConstitutive Modelling14 Views 1,448
I am using SANISAND to simulate a triaxial compression test under monotonic loading. But every time my simulations break and give the same message “Abaqus/Implicit Packager exited with an error […] 
VUMAT ABAQUS: sandy soil
hoang thai anConstitutive Modelling2 Views 1,349
Dear PhD, I am studying roller vibrations on sandy soil models with vumat. Can PhD give me the subroutine model and input parameters of objects for reference? Unit of the […] 
PLAXIS 2D Embedded Pile Row
BENAN ZAHAWIConstitutive Modelling0 Views 1,148
PLAXIS 2D require a “Lateral Resistance ” for the embedded pile row. The manuals are not very clear as to what the resistance represents? Is it on friction ( similar […] 
SANICLAYB (2018) how to calculate Dep
Steve XuConstitutive Modelling0 Views 1,027
Dear fellows, I have been working on coding SANICLAYB model (2018) . Now I have one question in terms of this model. But I am stuck now. I have two […] 
Problems with the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model
meng xiaoweiConstitutive Modelling3 Views 1,148
Where can I find the source of the content in the picture below in the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model? 
SSE and SPD Mohr Coulomb Crieria
Matías Sáez de TejadaConstitutive Modelling0 Views 1,415
I have a UMAT of Mohr Coulomb with no hardening, where i have to define SSE (specific strain energy) and SPD (specific plastic dissipation). Any idea?
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Shear modulus degragation 12.5.2022
 FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity interface 23.4.2022
 Hypoumat sand 18.4.2022
 Hypoumat sand 18.4.2022
 Using pore fluidstress element in SandSand 9.4.2022
 “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT 8.4.2022
 Prague Geotechnical Days 2022 with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Cino Viggiani 7.4.2022
 Micropiles load tests database 26.3.2022
 DIANA 10.5 new features 10.3.2022
 Input files for element tests for hypoplastic clay/sand UMAT 6.3.2022
 Combining Hypoplasticsand and Hypoplasticclay in one UMAT file 2.3.2022
 UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes 19.2.2022
Recent Comments
 Tao Zhu on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
 Alireza Lajmiri on Download package of ISA cyclic hypoplasticity for Abaqus
 Baban Bapir on Shear modulus degragation
 Rakshanda Showkat on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
 HaoRan OUYANG on Using pore fluidstress element in SandSand
 HaoRan OUYANG on Course “Hypoplasticity for Practical Applications”
 Miracle Dai on Hypoumat sand
 Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
 Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
 Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
 Kassem Dib on Transient Dynamic analysis (UP formulation)
 Yifei Sun on matlab driver
 SPARSHA SINDURI NAGULA on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Srinivas Vivek Bokkisa on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
 MOHD SAQIB on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
 Srinivas Vivek Bokkisa on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
 Jesus Mediavilla on DIANA FEA 10.3 new release – special on geotechnics
 KengWit Lim on UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards