Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles

Effects of water content in sand in hypoplastic strength parameters
Abdiel Ramon Leon BalConstitutive Modelling0 Views 3,249
Dear All, I am currently using the hypoplastic model for gran materials from Prof. von Wolffersdorff to simulate soil excavations in a context of large deformations. I have been searching […] 
Getting started with UMAT for Hypoplastic clay model in ABAQUS
Kanika LambaConstitutive Modelling0 Views 3,577
Hello All, I am getting started with implementing UMAT for soil model in ABAQUS. I am planning to use Hypoplastic clay constitutive soil model to simulate the triaxial tests. I […] 
A question about the hypoplastic model in clay
Wenbo GuConstitutive Modelling7 Views 3,630
Hello, I am writting to ask how to get the elastic modulus or undrained strength of the soil in the simulation model by using hypoplastic model in clay? Is there […] 
abaqus version
sobhan abedinnejadConstitutive Modelling3 Views 3,341
hi every one i’m using abaqus 2017 and i want to implement Hyposand to my Biaxial model (2D) and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully my question is […] 
General Questions Hypoplastic Umat on Abaqus
Hashmi SohawonConstitutive Modelling11 Views 3,794
Hi all, After successfully testing a linear elastic Umat on Abaqus, I am now trying to test the Hypoplastic model Umat. I intend to carry out a drained triaxial single […] 
MatLab m.file
Ala AljoranyConstitutive Modelling6 Views 4,602
Hi everyone, I’m trying to simulate a triaxial test by using Matlab, adopting the sand hypoplasticity model with strain softening but so far couldn’t succeed. Would anyone help me with […] 
Hypoplastic UMAT & Void Ratio
Hashmi SohawonConstitutive Modelling0 Views 4,934
Hi all, Can anyone give a clarification on the material property (parameter 22) in the hypopplasticity umat for clay on Abaqus. My understanding is that these parameters are defined as […] 
Problem with SANISAND UMAT
Safia EDAOUDIConstitutive Modelling3 Views 8,465
Hello all, I’m using the SANISAND UMAT I downloaded here for my research, the problem I found is it gives me wrong results in ABAQUS and INCREMENTAL DRIVER for element […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias 25.5.2023
 Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus. 17.5.2023
 An error in the SANISAND umat runtime 8.5.2023
 Htypoplastic Model in Miidas GTS NX 25.4.2023
 set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat 2.4.2023
 FE formulation and software 25.3.2023
 Multiobjective analysis of the Sand Hypoplasticity model calibration 24.3.2023
 Problem with SANISAND UMAT 7.3.2023
 Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 (22nd – 23rd of May) with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Yannis Dafalias 28.2.2023
 What is an appropriate damping model for dynamic liquefaction analysis of tailings storage facility in FLAC? 10.2.2023
 Abaqus vs Plaxis – Local Convergence Tolerances 2.2.2023
 Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
Recent Comments
 Francisco Mendez on Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias
 Héctor Montenegro on Extended Mohr–Coulomb (EMC)
 Kassem Dib on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
 Isma Khabis on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
 Isma Khabis on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
 Kassem Dib on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
 Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards