Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles

Rate dependent plastic yield in Tochnog Question
Marlon HahnConstitutive Modelling0 Views 221
Hi, I am new to Tochnog and really appreciate the open source modeling chain (gmsh>Tochnog>paraview). So far, I’m only familiar with commercial codes, e.g. Abaqus. I actually deal with metal […] 
Hypoplastic UMAT error ABAQUS
Hashmi SohawonConstitutive Modelling1 Views 461
Hi all, I wanted to ask if anyone has experienced this error before when running the Hypoplastic UMAT (umat_hcea.for) on Abaqus? “Abaqus Error: The executable standard.exe aborted with system error […] 
Setting of Kw for Hypoplastic Clay UDSM in Plaxis
Joel TanConstitutive Modelling1 Views 287
Prof. David Masin, I am posting the queries I have emailed you earlier which you have answered and therefore I am posting it here as per your request. I wish […] 
PM4Sand now available in PLAXIS 2D
Micha van der SlootConstitutive Modelling1 Views 721
With the release of PLAXIS 2D 2018, a new User Defined Soil Model for liquefaction analysis is introduced, the PM4Sand model (Boulanger & Ziotopoulou, 2017). The PM4Sand model is defined […] 
testing an User Defined Soil Model in plaxis
MIGUEL VALENCIA GALINDOConstitutive Modelling1 Views 339
Hi everyone I am writing a code for a model in the UDSM format for Plaxis. I already have the “*.dll” files, but when I run the soil test I […] 
Constitutive Model for clayey sand Soils Considering the Effect of Intergranular Physicochemical Forces
Mehdi GhateiConstitutive Modelling0 Views 274
Hi all, I’m doing some experimental work to investigate the salinity effect on clayey sand behaviour. Is there any constitutive model considering the physicochemical forces for such materials? Regards, Mehdi 
Cyclic Behavior of Sand
MOHD SAQIBConstitutive Modelling3 Views 134
Hello, Is there any constitutive model for sand which can simulate the number of cycles to reach the critical state. I used the SANISAND model but it is not promising. […] 
PM4SAND model
Mohammad ZarrabiConstitutive Modelling3 Views 337
Hi all, I have been trying to code the PM4SAND model for several months, but I faced some problems. I was wondering if there is anyone who worked with this […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 ABAQUSUMAT Help 18.9.2020
 SANISAND umat issue 18.9.2020
 SANISAND pilesoilinteraction ABAQUS 10.9.2020
 Abaqus user defined field 27.8.2020
 Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain) 24.8.2020
 Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat 17.8.2020
 Barodesy download package including small strain stiffness and strength reduction (UMAT and PLAXIS dll) 15.8.2020
 Question on the Matlab driverhypoplastic models 8.8.2020
 Hypoplastic Interface Model: Does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D 31.7.2020
 Question on implementation of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus umat 28.7.2020
 General questions on implementation of sand hypoplasticity model with Abaqus umat 23.7.2020
 SANISAND 2008 model 23.7.2020
Recent Comments
 VIPIN TYAGI on Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
 Sigma/W  Sigma/W  Geoslope on Geoslope SIGMA/W
 VIPIN TYAGI on Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
 Arie Koot on SANISAND pilesoilinteraction ABAQUS
 Arie Koot on SANISAND pilesoilinteraction ABAQUS
 David Mašín on Mašín, D. (2015) Part 4: Determination of material parameters, PhD course “Hypoplasticity for Practical Applications” handouts [Presentation]
 Daniel Valencia on Mašín, D. (2015) Part 4: Determination of material parameters, PhD course “Hypoplasticity for Practical Applications” handouts [Presentation]
 Arie Koot on Abaqus user defined field
 Britta Bienen on Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
 Amir Mohammad Yarahmadi on Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
 Arie Koot on Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
 David Mašín on Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
 Kunpeng Wang on Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
 Nguyen Hurricane on UMAT Implementation of Sand Hypoplasticity by UIBK
 Mahdieh Masoudi on Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
 Rachel White on Question on implementation of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus umat
 Ruohan Sun on Hypoplastic Interface Model: Does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D
 David Mašín on Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards