Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles

lade umat file
sobhan abedinnejadConstitutive Modelling0 Views 386
Hi everyone, I work on soil constitutive models and I want to compare soil behaviours with various constitutive models but I can’t find Lade umat in the .for format. Can […] 
UMAT for NorSand
Shile DongConstitutive Modelling0 Views 351
Dear all, I am pretty new in coding and using Abaqus. I have trouble with coding the UMAT for NorSand. If any of you have any good references, please share […] 
Question on the Matlab driverhypoplastic models
c sxConstitutive Modelling5 Views 258
Dear all, After carefully reading the matlab drivers of hypoplastic models, I was wondering why there is not mix control undrained TX compression. I want to achieve the same result […] 
Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
Shuhan CaoConstitutive Modelling4 Views 374
Dear all, does anyone have the umat code for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus? For my current work I need a umat for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus. It would be highly […] 
ALERT Geomaterials – SoilModels support declaration
David MašínConstitutive Modelling0 Views 469
ALERT Geomaterials (The Alliance of Laboratories in Europe for Education, Research and Technology) is a European organisation including 33 Universities or Organisations, which are most active in the field of numerical […] 
USDM – Creep SCLAY1S
Balaji BandaruConstitutive Modelling1 Views 158
I have the license, but can’t login as it is a server license. In order to access this model, i need the .dll file. Can anyone help me with this. […] 
testing an User Defined Soil Model in plaxis
MIGUEL VALENCIA GALINDOConstitutive Modelling1 Views 554
Hi everyone I am writing a code for a model in the UDSM format for Plaxis. I already have the “*.dll” files, but when I run the soil test I […] 
Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
Hashmi SohawonConstitutive Modelling4 Views 318
Hi David, I have reproduced some single elements test on ABAQUS using the UMAT to compare with Triax Hypoplasticity. So far, my stiffness curve (q vs ea) and my stress […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Interactive graphics of yield surfaces 30.4.2021
 Enhanced location search feature at SoilModels 30.4.2021
 How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below? 28.4.2021
 PHD Position on “Triggering and propagation of liquefaction in brittle geotechnical materials” at CIMNEUPC (Barcelona, Spain) 27.4.2021
 Guidance to newbie on how to calibrate a constitutive model 25.4.2021
 Oedometer tests on Ticino sand 8.4.2021
 PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D 30.3.2021
 Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
 K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
 Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
 Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog 11.2.2021
 Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model 8.2.2021
Recent Comments
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 MOHD SAQIB on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Setting of Kw for Hypoplastic Clay UDSM in Plaxis
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Hyposand UMAT problem
 Micha Van der Sloot on Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
 Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Silt software
 Daniel Valencia on PM4Silt software
 Yang Tang on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
 略轩 黄 on PLAXIS
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards