Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles

UMAT for strainrate effects
Luis ZambranoCruzattyConstitutive Modelling0 Views 107
Dear community, I’m interested in constitutive models that can handle strainrate effects for HSR on sands for simulating free fall penetration. I would appreciate any help. Do you know any […] 
Velacs Project Data
WaiChing SunConstitutive Modelling1 Views 217
Dear colleagues, I want to ask your help — does anyone know where we can find all the test data from the old Velacs Project? If so, that would be […] 
Hypoplastcity sand model
Pooja PatilConstitutive Modelling7 Views 369
Not able to run the subroutine ……..error is coming ……UMAT: illegal (negative) actual void ratio detected Can anybody help 
Hypoplastic Model for Clays (Masin): Ag, ng or Gvh, n
Fernando SarabiaConstitutive Modelling1 Views 340
Dr. Masin I have downloaded the most recent dll for Plaxis that includes the HypoPlastic model for Clays that you developed. I see two new parameters (Gvh0 and n), both […] 
Setting of Kw for Hypoplastic Clay UDSM in Plaxis
Joel TanConstitutive Modelling1 Views 210
Prof. David Masin, I am posting the queries I have emailed you earlier which you have answered and therefore I am posting it here as per your request. I wish […] 
ExCalibre – Definiton of q
Manuel WinklerConstitutive Modelling3 Views 263
Hello, I am performing calibration trials for the hypoplastic sand model with the aid of ExCalibre and i was wondering how the deviatoric stresses q for the triaxial test input […] 
CEL analysis using hypo plasticity Vumat
abd ElfattahConstitutive Modelling8 Views 368
Greetings i used interface Vumat with Umat for simulating CEL problem, after 50% of analysis, i got the error as “Excessive incremental rotation of the elements in element set ” […] 
ExCalibre Automatic Calibration
Marco HoferConstitutive Modelling2 Views 251
Hello all, i hava a problem with the Oedometer curves after the automatic calibration with ExCalibre. I took the Dobrany sand dataset for an automatic calibration and then i copied […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 3D analysis with Basic HypoPlastic Model 11.12.2019
 Modified Cam clay model now supported in automatic calibration software ExCalibre 29.11.2019
 Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model 21.11.2019
 DIANA with monopile follows Blum theory saving 10 m of length 18.11.2019
 Hypoplastic UMAT error ABAQUS 11.11.2019
Recent Comments
 David Mašín on 3D analysis with Basic HypoPlastic Model
 Hashmi Sohawon on Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
 MOHD SAQIB on Upated version of SANISAND umat including Plaxis interface
 David Mašín on Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
 Hashmi Sohawon on Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
 David Mašín on Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
 Hashmi Sohawon on Hypoplastic UMAT error ABAQUS
 Shuntao Fan on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMATPlaxis interface
 David Mašín on finite element modeling of ISAHP for sand material
 Hans Henning Stutz on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMATPlaxis interface
 Shuntao Fan on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMATPlaxis interface
 Piotr Kowalczyk on Sanisand model
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards