Dear All,
I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains.
Firstly, I have tried to simulate cyclic simple shear test from Shahnazari & Towhata (2002), Fig. 5, on Toyoura Sand. It is in the range of medium strains, up to 3%. The simulation looks really good (see attached pdf file). The sample contracts systematically with cycles thus the stiffness increases as per the experiment. Note contraction is with negative sign, Abaqus standard notation.
Secondly, I have subjected the same sample to cyclic loading but with significantly reduced strain amplitude, i.e. 0.1%. As expected, also here the sample contracts, however, the stiffness decreases with cycles which to me does not seem physical.
The model is calibrated as shown in Herle & Gudehus (1999) Table VII for Toyoura Sand. Intergranular strain parameters are set to also rather common values: R=0.0001, m_R=5.0, m_T=2.0, Beta=0.5, ksi=6.0. I have tried using both umats, from prof. Masin and prof. Fellin, both give the same answers.
I am wondering where is it I can be wrong here. Theoretically, I think I should be able to model sand behaviour for both strain levels with a single set of calibrated parameters.
Thank you all in advance for any comments and tips on how to approach my problem.
Regards
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Related Articles


Question on the Matlab driverhypoplastic models
c sxConstitutive Modelling5 Views 1,107
Dear all, After carefully reading the matlab drivers of hypoplastic models, I was wondering why there is not mix control undrained TX compression. I want to achieve the same result […] 
UMAT Code for Clay Hypoplasticity
Shen WangConstitutive Modelling4 Views 1,429
Hello Everyone, I am using the UMAT code for clay hypoplasticity provided by Prof. Masin — https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxisumathypoplaszip/ I made a oedometeric test model in Abaqus2018 and applied the umat code […] 
Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
Shuhan CaoConstitutive Modelling4 Views 1,781
Dear all, does anyone have the umat code for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus? For my current work I need a umat for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus. It would be highly […] 
Cyclic Triaxial Test
Mehdi JoneidiConstitutive Modelling2 Views 1,339
Dear All, I am using ISA+HP model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic triaxial test for single element. The target model was selected […] 
How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
Geyang SongConstitutive Modelling8 Views 1,540
Hello: I’m a postdoc at the University of Nottingham, and I’m using the hypoplastic model to simulate the centrifuge tests we did. The research area is related to soilpile interaction. […] 
Looking for help
Axel GrauwinkelConstitutive Modelling4 Views 217
Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUPRECtest plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite […] 
Triaxial Callibration test with Hypoplasticity
pooyan ghasemiConstitutive Modelling3 Views 1,197
Dear all I am trying to calibrate the HP for sand, and I have quite comprehensive data. but they are not totally consistent with each other . we have the […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 A question about the hypoplastic model in clay 22.9.2022
 A HighCycle Accumulation Model for Sand (Niemunis et al., 2005) 6.9.2022
 Malaysian kaolin – Cyclic tests by Charles University 5.9.2022
 Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model 2.9.2022
 GTS NX 25.7.2022
 Special issue of Computers and Structures “Numerical simulation of multi‐physics phenomena in geotechnical structures” 25.7.2022
 Postdoctorate position at Nantes University (France) in geotechnical analysis of mutualized anchors 6.7.2022
 SIFEL – THM Model for Bentonite Barriers 27.6.2022
 ABAQUS job doesn’t make any increment 22.6.2022
 NorSand model for cyclic triaxial testing 9.6.2022
 Postdoc position at Charles University in the field of THM analysis of unsaturated and heated soil cyclic loading 30.5.2022
 Shear modulus degragation 12.5.2022
Recent Comments
 David Mašín on A question about the hypoplastic model in clay
 Katarzyna DołżykSzypcio on Download package of a complete dataset “Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)”
 Wenbo Gu on A question about the hypoplastic model in clay
 Muhammad Ahmad on A question about the hypoplastic model in clay
 Wenbo Gu on A question about the hypoplastic model in clay
 Muhammad Ahmad on A question about the hypoplastic model in clay
 Muhammad Ahmad on Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model
 David Mašín on Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model
 Jie Wang on Interpreting results of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus VUMAT
 Muhammad Ahmad on Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model
 David Mašín on Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model
 Raj Banerjee on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Amrane Moussa on Special issue of Computers and Structures “Numerical simulation of multi‐physics phenomena in geotechnical structures”
 Riccardo Zabatta on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
 Haibo Jiang on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
 Giada Orlando on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
 Sanchari Mondal on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
 Dimitrios Konstantinidis on multi yield surface model
Dear Piotr,
The simulation in the range of medium strains looks really good and the parameters are typical, so I consider that the simulations are well performed. However, the behavior under small strains is unrealistic. In my opinion, this is a model limitation. Some authors have demonstrate the difficulty of reproducing different kinds of test conditions with a single set of parameters (which is a wellknown drawback of the models, and is discussed in some works e.g. [1])
Regards,
Jose Duque
[1] Wichtmann, T. (2016), “Soil behaviour under cyclic loading: Experimental observations, constitutive
description and applications”, Habilitation, karlsruhe institute of technology (KIT).
Hey Jose
Thanks for the reply. It also seems to me to be a case as you described.
Actually, using more recent calibration from prof. Herle, with quite different set of the model parameters, seems to improve a bit the problem, not completely though.
Regards