Dear All,
I am using ISA+HP model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic triaxial test for single element.
The target model was selected from Professor Wichtmann lab test ( TCUI11). This sample is a cyclic test for Karlsruhe fine sand. Also, for sand modelling the ISA+HP model was used (Fuentes, W., Wichtmann, T., Gil, M., & Lascarro, C. (2020). ISA-Hypoplasticity accounting for cyclic mobility effects for liquefaction analysis. Acta Geotechnica, 15(6), 1513-1531.).
Confining pressure is equal 200KPa and deviatoric stress was considered base on sinusoidal loading with Amp=40KPa (100 cycle).
The result of E22 is not desirable and in the curve E22 versus q no loop is observed.
Could you please tell me what is the main wrong in this simulation?
Cyclic Triaxial Test
Related Articles
-
Hypoplastic sand-mr parameter calibration
anis kheffache||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,055
Dear all, I have a question about Hypoplasticity for sand model, i am having trouble to understand about how to calibrate the mr parameter ? Since no formula is provided […] -
Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
Riccardo Zabatta||Constitutive Modelling|9 |Views 4,463
I am trying to reproduce a TX monotonic, compressive test on a sand by using a 1-element, axisymmetric ABAQUS FE model, assigned to a SANISAND material. For this purpose, I […] -
UMAT for strain-rate effects
Luis Zambrano-Cruzatty||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 3,930
Dear community, I’m interested in constitutive models that can handle strain-rate effects for HSR on sands for simulating free fall penetration. I would appreciate any help. Do you know any […] -
Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms
Francisco Mendez||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,092
I am happy to announce that our pre-print paper, “Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms”, is available on researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342198062_Calibration_of_the_von_Wolffersdorff_model_using_Genetic_Algorithms. In this article, we propose a novel […] -
Question on the Matlab driver-hypoplastic models
c sx||Constitutive Modelling|5 |Views 3,921
Dear all, After carefully reading the matlab drivers of hypoplastic models, I was wondering why there is not mix control undrained TX compression. I want to achieve the same result […] -
Oedometer test simulation with “Sand Hypoplasticity Model” in Plaxis
Manuel Winkler||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,358
Hi, I just came across some problems with the implementation of the “Sand Hypoplasticity Model” in Plaxis. I wanted to to perform a simulation of an oedometer test on a […] -
Non-local regularization: Need VUMAT of Mohr-Coulomb model in abaqus
Kunal Sanjay Pardikar||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 4,552
Dear Community, I want to include a non-local regularization technique in the built-in Mohr-Coulomb model of abaqus to capture the strain-localization effects. I am trying to find the original VUMAT […] -
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
- UMAT for Creep-SCLAY model. 1.3.2024
- Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver 14.2.2024
- SUMMER SCHOOL ‘Numerical Modelling in Geotechnical Engineering’, Innsbruck – July 22nd-26th, 2024 1.2.2024
- COURSE IN SOIL MODELING – NTNU, Trondheim – October 14th to 18th, 2024 21.12.2023
- MSE walls design in Plaxis 11.12.2023
- sand liquefaction modelling in Anura3D 8.12.2023
- BCV bentonite experimental and modelling datasets 14.11.2023
- Challenges in simulating geomechanical models using Mohr-Coulomb with Tension Cut-Off in Abaqus 20.10.2023
- Analys soil liquefaction with Abaqus under blast load 19.10.2023
- Hardening soil Model UMAT 13.9.2023
- Problem with VUMAT interface 20.8.2023
- UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p) 5.8.2023
Recent Comments
- Chen Zhiming on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Konstantinos Chatzis on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Abhay Pratap Singh on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Giovanni Ciardi on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Konstantinos Chatzis on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Ismail Khan on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Kanika Lamba on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Arie Koot on How to model the settlement in soil due to water drawdown.
- Konstantinos Chatzis on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Jose Duque on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- MohamadReza Kamali on How to model the settlement in soil due to water drawdown.
- Leo Alibert on MSE walls design in Plaxis
- Ignacio Zuloaga on MSE walls design in Plaxis
- Giada Orlando on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Michael Spyridis on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Ahmad Moeineddin on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Nikolay Suyo Calla on Hardening soil Model UMAT
- Johan Clausen on Challenges in simulating geomechanical models using Mohr-Coulomb with Tension Cut-Off in Abaqus
Dear Mehdi,
I was checking the parameters that you reported and I noticed two issues:
1) The mechanical constant 7 is “eio”. You are using 0.842 which is below “eco”, which is not correct. Professor Fuentes reported in his calibration for Karlsruhe fine sand ei0=1.212
2) I do not know which implementation of the HP+ISA model are you using, but usually in the umats of professor Fuentes the friction angle is input in radians, please verify that
One last comment, in order to reproduce the cyclic test results reported in that paper, you should simulate the preloading history of the test (isotropic compression) or initialize tensors h and c as isotropically fully mobilized
Kind regards,
Jose
Dear Jose,
Thank you for your comment.
Yes, the value of maximum void ratio at p=0 was incorrect and modified to ei0=1.212 but the model is so sensitive to phic when the phic=0.56 after few cycles the verical strain dramatically increase while this condition don’t observe in phic=32.6!!