Dear All,
I am using ISA+HP model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic triaxial test for single element.
The target model was selected from Professor Wichtmann lab test ( TCUI11). This sample is a cyclic test for Karlsruhe fine sand. Also, for sand modelling the ISA+HP model was used (Fuentes, W., Wichtmann, T., Gil, M., & Lascarro, C. (2020). ISA-Hypoplasticity accounting for cyclic mobility effects for liquefaction analysis. Acta Geotechnica, 15(6), 1513-1531.).
Confining pressure is equal 200KPa and deviatoric stress was considered base on sinusoidal loading with Amp=40KPa (100 cycle).
The result of E22 is not desirable and in the curve E22 versus q no loop is observed.
Could you please tell me what is the main wrong in this simulation?
Cyclic Triaxial Test
Related Articles
-
Setting of Kw for Hypoplastic Clay UDSM in Plaxis
Joel Tan||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 2,516
Prof. David Masin, I am posting the queries I have emailed you earlier which you have answered and therefore I am posting it here as per your request. I wish […] -
The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws
Francisco Mendez||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 4,422
I am happy to announce that our pre-print paper, “The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws: a tutorial and a user manual”, is available on researchgate […] -
How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
Geyang Song||Constitutive Modelling|8 |
Views 2,761
Hello: I’m a post-doc at the University of Nottingham, and I’m using the hypoplastic model to simulate the centrifuge tests we did. The research area is related to soil-pile interaction. […] -
Compatibility of subroutines in ABQ2021
Erick Kencana||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 2,733
Hi Admin, I have been using hypoplastic subroutine supplied by this website. It works well in ABQ6.14 and ABQ2017. However, recently I have to upgrade to ABQ2021 due to an […] -
Clay Hypoplastic Model ABAQUS UMAT
Hashmi Sohawon||Constitutive Modelling|3 |
Views 2,687
Hi, I wanted to ask if the variables/parameters defined in the online Hypoplastic model manual for PLAXIS (https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node6.html) are the same for the ABAQUS UMAT? -
Dynamic Compaction Simulation by ABAQUS
shenouda Mekhail||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 2,657
Greeting Everyone, I’m a new user of ABAQUS. I’m trying to simulate soil dynamic compaction by Cap model. I simulated the blow by half sinusoidal wave. Although I used Cap […] -
Sanisand umat with BV problem
Luis Aviles||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 2,234
Hi, Does someone know if sanisand implementation has been used in a boundary value problem for slope? do you have any references? Thanks very much! -
3D analysis with Basic Hypo-Plastic Model
sobhan abedinnejad||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 2,314
Dear all Is the basic Hypo-Plastic model (Wollffersdorff’s model) suitable for 3D models? Can I analyze 3D models with this UMAT? (https://soilmodels.com/download/umat-hyposand-uibk/) Thank you Sobhan
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
-
New features in Excalibre 17.1.2023
-
Sanisand 13.1.2023
-
SaniSand Model in Plaxis 3D 9.12.2022
-
The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws 2.12.2022
-
Abaqus OneAPI Compiler 10.11.2022
-
Few more Question on calculating lateral displacement of pile using hypoplastic clay model 3.10.2022
-
A question about the hypoplastic model in clay 22.9.2022
-
A High-Cycle Accumulation Model for Sand (Niemunis et al., 2005) 6.9.2022
-
Malaysian kaolin – Cyclic tests by Charles University 5.9.2022
-
Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model 2.9.2022
-
GTS NX 25.7.2022
Recent Comments
- Shruthija Sreeram on UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines)
- Paul Le Roux on Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University
- Amrane Moussa on Download package of a complete dataset “Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University”
- Francisco Mendez on The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws
- Abolfazl Najafi on The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws
- Arie Koot on SaniSand Model in Plaxis 3D
- Sajjad Shakeri on UDSM PLAXIS
- Anis Kheffache on Abaqus OneAPI Compiler
- Kassem Dib on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
- Dimitrios Konstantinidis on Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
- Tomáš Kadlíček on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Safia EDAOUDI on Simulating Oedometer test in PLAXIS
- Safia EDAOUDI on Simulating the oedometric test with Abaqus
- MOHD SAQIB on Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
- Dimitrios Konstantinidis on Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
- Guilherme Castro on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Giada Orlando on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Paul Le Roux on PM4Sand and PM4Silt models available
Dear Mehdi,
I was checking the parameters that you reported and I noticed two issues:
1) The mechanical constant 7 is “eio”. You are using 0.842 which is below “eco”, which is not correct. Professor Fuentes reported in his calibration for Karlsruhe fine sand ei0=1.212
2) I do not know which implementation of the HP+ISA model are you using, but usually in the umats of professor Fuentes the friction angle is input in radians, please verify that
One last comment, in order to reproduce the cyclic test results reported in that paper, you should simulate the preloading history of the test (isotropic compression) or initialize tensors h and c as isotropically fully mobilized
Kind regards,
Jose
Dear Jose,
Thank you for your comment.
Yes, the value of maximum void ratio at p=0 was incorrect and modified to ei0=1.212 but the model is so sensitive to phic when the phic=0.56 after few cycles the verical strain dramatically increase while this condition don’t observe in phic=32.6!!