“A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface” paper by P. A. Von Wolffersdorff April 1996 include a triaxial test result of sample 10cm diameter and length. The Hochstetten sand properties are assigned screenshot is attached below and Meshing of the sample by standard linear C3D8 brick element. Two steps of static general are created. step 1 confining pressure of 200 kPa and step 2, shearing stage applied displacement of 1cm by creating 10 second time step (1mm/sec loading rate). After the analysis completed the stress S33 in Z direction after shearing not generated. stresses are same as during confining stage in S11, S22 and S33 even after 1cm displacement of the soil sample.
Difficulties in calibration of triaxial test on Hochstetten sand by sand Hypoplasticity model
Related Articles
-
Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soil-monopile interaction
philip alkhoury||Constitutive Modelling|4 |Views 7,375
Dear all, I am trying to model soil-monopile interaction (3D) in ABAQUS/Standard in order to perform subsequently a cyclic and dynamic analysis. For the soil I am using the SANISAND […] -
MATLAB Code for Bounding Surface Plasticity Model
A S M RIYAD||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 6,286
Dear Altruists, I just wanted to learn the bounding surface plasticity theory with coding. Does anyone have any code (written in MATLAB) for the Bounding Surface Plasticity model? Could you […] -
abaqus version
sobhan abedinnejad||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,887
hi every one i’m using abaqus 2017 and i want to implement Hypo-sand to my Biaxial model (2D) and before all, i linked abaqus and fortran successfully my question is […] -
Hypoplastic model for Granular soil
Naveen Meena||Constitutive Modelling|5 |Views 5,858
Hello everyone, Could you please anyone tell me that how I can define the hypoplastic constitutive model for granular soil in ABAQUS 6.13. With Regards, Naveen. -
Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
Balaji Bandaru||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 6,487
Soft soil and soft soil creep model both include time while performing the analysis. What is the difference between both of them. -
Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
yang fuqin||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 5,810
Dear all, does anyone have the umat code for Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small in Abaqus? For my current work I need a umat for Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small […] -
What is an appropriate damping model for dynamic liquefaction analysis of tailings storage facility in FLAC?
Paul le Roux||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 8,696
Has anyone had success simulating earthquake loading / dynamic liquefaction in a full-scale, plane-strain model of a TSF in FLAC2D/FLAC3D? The topic of damping is complex and the choice of […] -
Hardening soil Model UMAT
isma khabis||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 5,746
I have the hardening soil model in the UMAT format. However, when I run the code, it gives me this error as shown in the picture. I tried to make […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
Recent Comments
- Ding Yan on Download package of a complete dataset “Karlsruhe Kaolin – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)”
- Arie Koot on mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface
- Arie Koot on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Amir F on Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software
- Nabanita Saha on set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat
- Nabanita Saha on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Tian Fapai on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Heng Wang on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Zhang Hongwei on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Ruimin Chen on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Nitesh Bhume on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Aleksandar Kostadinovic on Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
- Amrane Moussa on Kadlíček, T., Ochmański, M., Mašín, D. and Duque, J. (2022) Report on Charles University implementation of high cycle accumulation model
- Ramon Varghese on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Shuhan Cao on Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
- Kuikui Guigui on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
- Kuikui Guigui on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Francisco José Mendez on Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic









Hi Akshay, it seems to me that you assign Par15 to very high value. Par15 is bulk modulus of water to be used exclusively in undrained analysis using penalty method. As you apply undrained condition during compression stage, effective stress will not change. Can you try to set Par15=0 and rerun? Please check Statev8, which is pore water pressure, and calculate the effective stresses yourself as total stress (Abaqus output) minus pwp. Regards David
Dear Dr. David Mašín
also i am facing this problem when generate intergranular strain parameters with setting Par15=0. but no problem when turn off intergranular strain parameters.
Regards