“A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface” paper by P. A. Von Wolffersdorff April 1996 include a triaxial test result of sample 10cm diameter and length. The Hochstetten sand properties are assigned screenshot is attached below and Meshing of the sample by standard linear C3D8 brick element. Two steps of static general are created. step 1 confining pressure of 200 kPa and step 2, shearing stage applied displacement of 1cm by creating 10 second time step (1mm/sec loading rate). After the analysis completed the stress S33 in Z direction after shearing not generated. stresses are same as during confining stage in S11, S22 and S33 even after 1cm displacement of the soil sample.
Difficulties in calibration of triaxial test on Hochstetten sand by sand Hypoplasticity model
Related Articles
-
Input files for element tests for hypoplastic clay/sand UMAT
Juan Tello||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 4,565
I’m interested in using the model for simulating excavations in clay, where the small strain modulus is important, and the analysis has to be transient consolidation. It would be helpful […] -
sand liquefaction modelling in Anura3D
Daniel Brox||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 1,376
Beginner level question for this forum – Trying to replace a Mohr-Coulomb model of sand in an Anura3D simulation with a material model which accurately describes sand liquefaction. References I’ve […] -
3D analysis with Basic Hypo-Plastic Model
sobhan abedinnejad||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,612
Dear all Is the basic Hypo-Plastic model (Wollffersdorff’s model) suitable for 3D models? Can I analyze 3D models with this UMAT? (https://soilmodels.com/download/umat-hyposand-uibk/) Thank you Sobhan -
SANISAND pile-soil-interaction ABAQUS
Lee Jae Sung||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 5,924
Hi everyone: I am trying to use SANISAND as the constitutive model of soil, and use ABAQUS software to simulate pile-soil interaction. Is it better to choose “Static, Genaral” analysis […] -
REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING
Marcelo Llano||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 3,926
Red Earth Engineering (REE) seeks expertise in computational mechanics and constitutive modelling in geotechnical engineering to undertake a consultancy project. The project aims to develop Python codes to solve the […] -
hypoplastic interface
jie wang||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 2,574
I want to consider particle crushing in the hypoplastic interface model. Also, when I use the CEL method to simulate, how can I use the hypoplastic interface model? Should I […] -
Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
Riccardo Zabatta||Constitutive Modelling|9 |Views 5,168
I am trying to reproduce a TX monotonic, compressive test on a sand by using a 1-element, axisymmetric ABAQUS FE model, assigned to a SANISAND material. For this purpose, I […] -
Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
Kunpeng Wang||Constitutive Modelling|12 |Views 15,916
Dear all, Recently, I have been working on the simulation of a pile-soil interaction with CEL method in Abaqus/Explicit. I simulate the sand with the Sand Hypoplasticity Model provided by […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
-
Suggestions for an Advanced Constitutive Model in FEM-Based Dynamic Slope Stability Analysis 12.2.2025
-
Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus 2.1.2025
-
hypoplastic interface 11.12.2024
-
Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND 30.10.2024
Recent Comments
- Nabanita Saha on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Tian Fapai on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Heng Wang on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Zhang Hongwei on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Ruimin Chen on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Nitesh Bhume on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Aleksandar Kostadinovic on Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
- Amrane Moussa on Kadlíček, T., Ochmański, M., Mašín, D. and Duque, J. (2022) Report on Charles University implementation of high cycle accumulation model
- Ramon Varghese on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Shuhan Cao on Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
- Kuikui Guigui on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
- Kuikui Guigui on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Francisco José Mendez on Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic
- Francisco José Mendez on REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING
- Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen on GroundVib.setup.web.exe
- Maria Manakou on GroundVib.setup.web.exe
- Jay Chou on Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic
- Tongyu Di on Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic









Hi Akshay, it seems to me that you assign Par15 to very high value. Par15 is bulk modulus of water to be used exclusively in undrained analysis using penalty method. As you apply undrained condition during compression stage, effective stress will not change. Can you try to set Par15=0 and rerun? Please check Statev8, which is pore water pressure, and calculate the effective stresses yourself as total stress (Abaqus output) minus pwp. Regards David
Dear Dr. David Mašín
also i am facing this problem when generate intergranular strain parameters with setting Par15=0. but no problem when turn off intergranular strain parameters.
Regards