“A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface” paper by P. A. Von Wolffersdorff April 1996 include a triaxial test result of sample 10cm diameter and length. The Hochstetten sand properties are assigned screenshot is attached below and Meshing of the sample by standard linear C3D8 brick element. Two steps of static general are created. step 1 confining pressure of 200 kPa and step 2, shearing stage applied displacement of 1cm by creating 10 second time step (1mm/sec loading rate). After the analysis completed the stress S33 in Z direction after shearing not generated. stresses are same as during confining stage in S11, S22 and S33 even after 1cm displacement of the soil sample.
Difficulties in calibration of triaxial test on Hochstetten sand by sand Hypoplasticity model
Related Articles
-
testing an User Defined Soil Model in plaxis
MIGUEL VALENCIA GALINDO||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 1,388
Hi everyone I am writing a code for a model in the UDSM format for Plaxis. I already have the “*.dll” files, but when I run the soil test I […] -
Guidance to newbie on how to calibrate a constitutive model
Osama Dar||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 956
Hi! I am studying the behavior of kaolin clay under cyclic loading. The strain rate is kept at such that undrained behavior is maintained. I want to use an advanced […] -
Spurious oscillations in calculated accelerations
Piotr Kowalczyk||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 926
Hello everyone, I have just a general question how people approach the problem of spurious oscillations generated in dynamic analysis when using nonlinear soil constitutive models. I understand sometimes numerical […] -
General Questions Hypoplastic Umat on Abaqus
Hashmi Sohawon||Constitutive Modelling|11 |
Views 1,167
Hi all, After successfully testing a linear elastic Umat on Abaqus, I am now trying to test the Hypoplastic model Umat. I intend to carry out a drained triaxial single […] -
Automatic calibration software ExCalibre has been launched
David Mašín||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 1,277
On behalf of the team of developers I am happy to announce that, after more than four years of development and testing, ExCalibre has just been launched. ExCalibre is a […] -
SANISAND pile-soil-interaction ABAQUS
Lee Jae Sung||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 974
Hi everyone: I am trying to use SANISAND as the constitutive model of soil, and use ABAQUS software to simulate pile-soil interaction. Is it better to choose “Static, Genaral” analysis […] -
UMAT Code for Modified Cam Clay model
Mehtab Alam||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 1,625
I am trying to develop UMAT code for MCC, but facing difficulty. Is there any such files available which can help me to speed up. please refer. Thank you. -
Calibration of Hypoplastic material model parameters
Amine Aboufirass||Constitutive Modelling|6 |
Views 1,350
I would like to derive material parameters based for a simulation which will implement the hypoplastic material model based on the following information: • Heavily overconsolidated • Very dense, fine […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Shear modulus degragation 12.5.2022
-
FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity interface 23.4.2022
-
Hypo-umat sand 18.4.2022
-
Hypo-umat sand 18.4.2022
-
Using pore fluid-stress element in SandSand 9.4.2022
-
“Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT 8.4.2022
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2022 with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Cino Viggiani 7.4.2022
-
Micropiles load tests database 26.3.2022
-
DIANA 10.5 new features 10.3.2022
-
Input files for element tests for hypoplastic clay/sand UMAT 6.3.2022
-
Combining Hypoplastic-sand and Hypoplastic-clay in one UMAT file 2.3.2022
-
UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes 19.2.2022
Recent Comments
- Alireza Lajmiri on Download package of ISA cyclic hypoplasticity for Abaqus
- Baban Bapir on Shear modulus degragation
- Rakshanda Showkat on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- HaoRan OUYANG on Using pore fluid-stress element in SandSand
- HaoRan OUYANG on Course “Hypoplasticity for Practical Applications”
- Miracle Dai on Hypo-umat sand
- Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
- Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
- Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
- Kassem Dib on Transient Dynamic analysis (U-P formulation)
- Yifei Sun on matlab driver
- SPARSHA SINDURI NAGULA on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Srinivas Vivek Bokkisa on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
- MOHD SAQIB on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
- Srinivas Vivek Bokkisa on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
- Jesus Mediavilla on DIANA FEA 10.3 new release – special on geotechnics
- Keng-Wit Lim on UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes
- MOHD SAQIB on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
Hi Akshay, it seems to me that you assign Par15 to very high value. Par15 is bulk modulus of water to be used exclusively in undrained analysis using penalty method. As you apply undrained condition during compression stage, effective stress will not change. Can you try to set Par15=0 and rerun? Please check Statev8, which is pore water pressure, and calculate the effective stresses yourself as total stress (Abaqus output) minus pwp. Regards David
Dear Dr. David Mašín
also i am facing this problem when generate intergranular strain parameters with setting Par15=0. but no problem when turn off intergranular strain parameters.
Regards