“A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface” paper by P. A. Von Wolffersdorff April 1996 include a triaxial test result of sample 10cm diameter and length. The Hochstetten sand properties are assigned screenshot is attached below and Meshing of the sample by standard linear C3D8 brick element. Two steps of static general are created. step 1 confining pressure of 200 kPa and step 2, shearing stage applied displacement of 1cm by creating 10 second time step (1mm/sec loading rate). After the analysis completed the stress S33 in Z direction after shearing not generated. stresses are same as during confining stage in S11, S22 and S33 even after 1cm displacement of the soil sample.
Difficulties in calibration of triaxial test on Hochstetten sand by sand Hypoplasticity model
Related Articles
-
Calibration the UMAT sand hypoplastic parameters
aysar hassan||Constitutive Modelling|3 |
Views 3,419
Dear all, I’m facing trouble in calculating NO. 16 parameter in the UMAT for sand hypoplasticity by Dr. Masin, any help will be really appreciated especially with an example. Best […] -
Animating Soil Models – eLearning Project
Gertraud Medicus||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 4,343
Dear all, I am currently writing a proposal for a (small & hopefully nice) eLearning project: Within the project, I would like to create animations related to constitutive modelling. I […] -
How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
Sudipta Bhowmick||Constitutive Modelling|16 |
Views 4,900
I am using SANISAND to simulate a triaxial compression test under monotonic loading. But every time my simulations break and give the same message “Abaqus/Implicit Packager exited with an error […] -
MatLab m.file
Ala Aljorany||Constitutive Modelling|6 |
Views 4,604
Hi everyone, I’m trying to simulate a triaxial test by using Matlab, adopting the sand hypoplasticity model with strain softening but so far couldn’t succeed. Would anyone help me with […] -
Dynamic Compaction Simulation by ABAQUS
shenouda Mekhail||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 3,771
Greeting Everyone, I’m a new user of ABAQUS. I’m trying to simulate soil dynamic compaction by Cap model. I simulated the blow by half sinusoidal wave. Although I used Cap […] -
Getting started with UMAT for Hypoplastic clay model in ABAQUS
Kanika Lamba||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 3,580
Hello All, I am getting started with implementing UMAT for soil model in ABAQUS. I am planning to use Hypoplastic clay constitutive soil model to simulate the triaxial tests. I […] -
SANISAND pile-soil-interaction ABAQUS
Lee Jae Sung||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 3,818
Hi everyone: I am trying to use SANISAND as the constitutive model of soil, and use ABAQUS software to simulate pile-soil interaction. First step is “Geostatic”, the second step is […] -
Hypoplastic UMAT & Void Ratio
Hashmi Sohawon||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 4,934
Hi all, Can anyone give a clarification on the material property (parameter 22) in the hypopplasticity umat for clay on Abaqus. My understanding is that these parameters are defined as […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias 25.5.2023
-
Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus. 17.5.2023
-
An error in the SANISAND umat runtime 8.5.2023
-
Htypoplastic Model in Miidas GTS NX 25.4.2023
-
set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat 2.4.2023
-
FE formulation and software 25.3.2023
-
Multi-objective analysis of the Sand Hypoplasticity model calibration 24.3.2023
-
Problem with SANISAND UMAT 7.3.2023
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 (22nd – 23rd of May) with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Yannis Dafalias 28.2.2023
-
What is an appropriate damping model for dynamic liquefaction analysis of tailings storage facility in FLAC? 10.2.2023
-
Abaqus vs Plaxis – Local Convergence Tolerances 2.2.2023
-
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
Recent Comments
- Francisco Mendez on Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias
- Héctor Montenegro on Extended Mohr–Coulomb (EMC)
- Kassem Dib on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Isma Khabis on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Isma Khabis on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Kassem Dib on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
Hi Akshay, it seems to me that you assign Par15 to very high value. Par15 is bulk modulus of water to be used exclusively in undrained analysis using penalty method. As you apply undrained condition during compression stage, effective stress will not change. Can you try to set Par15=0 and rerun? Please check Statev8, which is pore water pressure, and calculate the effective stresses yourself as total stress (Abaqus output) minus pwp. Regards David
Dear Dr. David Mašín
also i am facing this problem when generate intergranular strain parameters with setting Par15=0. but no problem when turn off intergranular strain parameters.
Regards