“A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface” paper by P. A. Von Wolffersdorff April 1996 include a triaxial test result of sample 10cm diameter and length. The Hochstetten sand properties are assigned screenshot is attached below and Meshing of the sample by standard linear C3D8 brick element. Two steps of static general are created. step 1 confining pressure of 200 kPa and step 2, shearing stage applied displacement of 1cm by creating 10 second time step (1mm/sec loading rate). After the analysis completed the stress S33 in Z direction after shearing not generated. stresses are same as during confining stage in S11, S22 and S33 even after 1cm displacement of the soil sample.
Difficulties in calibration of triaxial test on Hochstetten sand by sand Hypoplasticity model
Related Articles
-
Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms
Francisco Mendez||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 330
I am happy to announce that our pre-print paper, “Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms”, is available on researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342198062_Calibration_of_the_von_Wolffersdorff_model_using_Genetic_Algorithms. In this article, we propose a novel […] -
Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
Balaji Bandaru||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 206
Soft soil and soft soil creep model both include time while performing the analysis. What is the difference between both of them. -
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Marco Hofer||Constitutive Modelling|3 |
Views 378
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […] -
Hypoplastcity sand model
Pooja Patil||Constitutive Modelling|11 |
Views 578
Not able to run the subroutine ……..error is coming ……UMAT: illegal (negative) actual void ratio detected Can anybody help -
multi yield surface model
kamal paknejad||Constitutive Modelling|3 |
Views 510
Hi everyone, i am trying to write umat subroutine for multi yield surface plasticity model.if its possible give me some information to do my project better and if some body […] -
UMAT Code for Modified Cam Clay model
Mehtab Alam||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 695
I am trying to develop UMAT code for MCC, but facing difficulty. Is there any such files available which can help me to speed up. please refer. Thank you. -
SANICLAY-B (2018) how to calculate Dep
Steve Xu||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 381
Dear fellows, I have been working on coding SANICLAY-B model (2018) . Now I have one question in terms of this model. But I am stuck now. I have two […] -
Error in abaqus when use sanisand
mj saffarian||Constitutive Modelling|5 |
Views 478
Hi everyone When I use sanisand model in abaqus , This error is seen Can anyone help? Other subroutines work well for me Is it possible for my input parameters […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Oedometer tests on Ticino sand 8.4.2021
-
PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D 30.3.2021
-
Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
-
K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
-
Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
-
Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog 11.2.2021
-
Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model 8.2.2021
-
Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading 8.2.2021
-
Guidance for a newbie 6.2.2021
-
Modelling Rate-dependent behaviour of clay [Urgent] 1.2.2021
-
Postdoctoral Fellowship in computational geomechanics 27.1.2021
-
USDM – Creep -SCLAY1S 25.1.2021
Recent Comments
- Yang Tang on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
- 略轩 黄 on PLAXIS
- Micha Van der Sloot on PLAXIS
- 略轩 黄 on PLAXIS
- Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Silt software
- Sudipta Bhowmick on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMAT-Plaxis interface
- MOHD SAQIB on Seismic Liquifaction
- Shaoxiang Chen on Download Package of Matlab Driver
- Shaoxiang Chen on Download package of ISA cyclic hypoplasticity for Abaqus
- Ademola Bolarinwa on Triax element test driver
- Mehdi Joneidi on A problem of convergence from using Hypoplastic model in Abaqus
- Mehdi Joneidi on Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading
- Mehdi Joneidi on Kadlíček, T. and Mašín, D. (2020). The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics (in print)
- David Mašín on Kadlíček, T. and Mašín, D. (2020). The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics (in print)
- Mehdi Joneidi on Kadlíček, T. and Mašín, D. (2020). The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics (in print)
- Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- Eduardo Muguet on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- Sudipta Bhowmick on Subroutine of SANISAND model
Hi Akshay, it seems to me that you assign Par15 to very high value. Par15 is bulk modulus of water to be used exclusively in undrained analysis using penalty method. As you apply undrained condition during compression stage, effective stress will not change. Can you try to set Par15=0 and rerun? Please check Statev8, which is pore water pressure, and calculate the effective stresses yourself as total stress (Abaqus output) minus pwp. Regards David
Dear Dr. David Mašín
also i am facing this problem when generate intergranular strain parameters with setting Par15=0. but no problem when turn off intergranular strain parameters.
Regards