- Version
- Download 563
- File Size 1.05 MB
- Create Date 6.7.2018
- Please login to download
||1 |
||1 |
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
-
Suggestions for an Advanced Constitutive Model in FEM-Based Dynamic Slope Stability Analysis 12.2.2025
-
Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus 2.1.2025
-
hypoplastic interface 11.12.2024
-
Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND 30.10.2024
-
REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING 23.10.2024
-
Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic 11.10.2024
Greetings professor,
I’m trying to implement clay hypoplastic model for a residual soil in Colombia. I do not count with the neccessary field or laboratory test to obtain the constitutive parameters related to stiffness anisotropy. Would you recommend to utilize only parameters related to the basic model and the intergranular strain concept, or should I obtain alpha_[G, E, u] by other thechnique such as optimization algorithms?
By the way, what I’m trying to do is to reproduce the soil mechanical behavior (different stress paths, drained and undrained, and different soil responses such as q vs ea, G degradations, among others) with only one set of parameters.
Thanks in advance!