Dear all, I require to use Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model in ABAQUS for which I need to write a subroutine. Kindly let me know if you can help, thank you.
Tags: Drucker PragerRelated Articles
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic
Hello everyone, I am using the ‘remeshing and interpolation technique with small strain’ (RITSS) method with hypoplastic, but I cannot continue the calculation after mapping. There is a warning in […] -
PM4SAND model
Hi all, I have been trying to code the PM4SAND model for several months, but I faced some problems. I was wondering if there is anyone who worked with this […] -
PM4Sand and PM4Silt models available
The constitutive models PM4Sand (Boulanger and Ziotopoulou 2017) and PM4Silt (Boulanger and Ziotopoulou 2018) for plane-strain earthquake engineering applications for sands, and clays and low-plasticity silts respectively are now available […] -
-
How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
Hello: I’m a post-doc at the University of Nottingham, and I’m using the hypoplastic model to simulate the centrifuge tests we did. The research area is related to soil-pile interaction. […] -
Compatibility of subroutines in ABQ2021
Hi Admin, I have been using hypoplastic subroutine supplied by this website. It works well in ABQ6.14 and ABQ2017. However, recently I have to upgrade to ABQ2021 due to an […] -
NorSand model for cyclic triaxial testing
Hi altruists, Hope all of you are doing well. I am looking for literature on the NorSand model, which considers the drained cyclic triaxial testing behavior. I have found a […] -
MATLAB Code for Bounding Surface Plasticity Model
Dear Altruists, I just wanted to learn the bounding surface plasticity theory with coding. Does anyone have any code (written in MATLAB) for the Bounding Surface Plasticity model? Could you […]
Who is Online
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Viscohypoplastic bentonite (VIBE) model 28.5.2026
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
A version of the Drucker-Prager subroutine without the cap can be found here:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/5ccwt5fv7y/8
However, there are some discrepancies compared to the standard Abaqus Drucker-Prager model, particularly in capturing certain material behaviors. You will likely need to develop this subroutine yourself, as researchers often retain such routines for their own use.