Dear all
I’m studying hypo-plastic constitutive law from beginning concepts
I traced concepts successfully until i faced **rate independent topic**
i read this topic in the prof. Wolfgangs paper (hypo-plasticity for beginners)
he said that “Rate-independence means that the gradient of the curve (stiffness) does not depend on the strain rate, Thus the stress rate must be precisely twice as large for a double strain rate” and in the fallowing he said that “the constitutive law may not have terms like (strain rate^2) (strain rate square )”
as you know the hypo-plastic constitutive law is non-linear in strain rate
my question is that how hypo-plastic constitutive law can fulfill the non-linearity (in strain-rate) with no term like (strain rate^2)
Related Articles
-
PhD course “Hypoplasticity for Practical Applications”
Are the slides in regards to Stiffness Anisotropy for Clay Hypoplasticity for the PhD course available online? The available document {Mašín, D. (2015) Part 4: Determination of material parameters, PhD […] -
Compile triax calibration software under windows
1. Download install exe (32 or 64 bit) from https://cygwin.com/install.html 2. Choose a mirror site / click Next and select all packages you need for compiling: Type: “gcc” into search […] -
Calibration problem
Dear Prof. David Mašín I am posting the queries I have emailed you as per your advice to post it here. During calibration for the basic hypoplasticity parameters using the […] -
Constitutive Model for clayey sand Soils Considering the Effect of Intergranular Physicochemical Forces
Hi all, I’m doing some experimental work to investigate the salinity effect on clayey sand behaviour. Is there any constitutive model considering the physicochemical forces for such materials? Regards, Mehdi -
SANICLAY-B (2018) how to calculate Dep
Dear fellows, I have been working on coding SANICLAY-B model (2018) . Now I have one question in terms of this model. But I am stuck now. I have two […] -
ExCalibre Automatic Calibration
Hello all, i have another question regarding the calibration process. Why do the initial void ratios differ between the input file and the output from excalibre? What is done during […] -
Question on the Matlab driver-hypoplastic models
Dear all, After carefully reading the matlab drivers of hypoplastic models, I was wondering whether the driver can simulate triaxial extension tests. As I change the constraints to reflect triaxial […] -
multi yield surface model
Hi everyone, i am trying to write umat subroutine for multi yield surface plasticity model.if its possible give me some information to do my project better and if some body […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
HP clay subroutine in Plaxis 30.10.2020
-
Modeling cyclic undrained sandy soil triaxial test using ABAQUS 27.10.2020
-
UMAT for NorSand 27.10.2020
-
Problem with Hypoplastic Vumat use with CEL in Abaqus 27.10.2020
-
Interpreting results of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus VUMAT 23.10.2020
-
Interpreting results of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus VUMAT 22.10.2020
-
Skin friction along depth of pile 18.10.2020
-
SANISAND pile-soil-interaction ABAQUS 13.10.2020
-
Issues with Tochnog Professional not posting groundflow velocities 12.10.2020
-
Question on the Matlab driver-hypoplastic models 28.9.2020
-
a question on the clay hypoplasticity model with Abaqus umat 26.9.2020
-
UMAT Code for Modified Cam Clay model 22.9.2020
Dear Sobhan, hypo equation is defined as stressrate=L:strainrate * N||strainrate||. Here, ||strainrate|| is Euclidean norm of strainrate, that is sqrt(strainrate:strainrate). You see that the equation is non-linear in strainrate (if strainrate changes direction, stressrate changes direction differently as the term with N only quantifies strainrate size, not direction). You also see that actually, units of ||strainrate|| are still 1/time, as there is sqrt(strainrate^2) involved, thus it is consistent with comment by prof. Wolffersdorff which you cited. I suggest to have a loom into my book “Modelling of Soil Behaviour with Hypoplasticity”, where fundamentals of hypoplasticity are explained in (hopefully) clear way. Regards David
thank you so much!