I tried to model sample of triaxial test in Abaqus program. I used hypoplastic subroutine. The parameters used in hypoplastic model was Hochstetten sand the given in website “https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html”.
The used steps of analysis were as;
– First step is for applying confining pressure in the sample.
– Second step is for consolidation process (dissipation of excess pore pressure).
– Third step is applying deviator stress (axial stress).
The analysis was completed in first and second steps, but it was aborted in third step (note: the deviator stress was small).
Could anyone to solve this problem?
The boundary conditions are shown in attachments figures.
Modeling of triaxial test sample by using hypoplastic subroutine
Related Articles

ABAQUS UMAT of hypoplastic clay model
Akhtyar Gul ShirzoiFinite Elements2 Views 701
Hi Everyone. I am new to this Platform. I want to use the hypoplastic model in my research. how I can download it UMAT file for ABAQUS software? 
Tochnog Professional Page moves
Dennis RoddemanFinite Elements1 Views 3,439
Hi All, Starting from Saturday January 26 2019 the Tochnog Professional page moves to http://www.tochnogprofessional.nl Best, Dennis Roddeman 
SANISAND 2008 model
MOHD SAQIBFinite Elements0 Views 3,458
Dear fellow, Anyone have SANISAND 2008 by Taiebat and Dafalias umat subroutine available for Abaqus. I have 2004 but I need 2008 one. 
Hypoplastic model for thermal cycles in clay (Abaqus)
Sherif GomaaFinite Elements2 Views 5,563
Dear all, I’m using the UMAT file in which the hypoplastic model for thermal cycles is implemented. I have done some runs for an axisymmetrical model for a single energy […] 
How to replicate results for vertical cut in FEM program
Amine AboufirassFinite Elements0 Views 3,646
The equations for a vertical cut in cohesive material are given in several publications including Heyman (1973): The stability of a vertical cut (see attachment Equations1.jpeg) and Verruijt (2001) Soil […] 
Tochnog Professional becomes free
Dennis RoddemanFinite Elements0 Views 3,676
After several decades of development we are happy to announce that the Tochnog Professional finite element program has become free. Both for academic and commercial use. We are extremely grateful […] 
An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
Zhentao LiuFinite Elements15 Views 2,025
Dear all I was simulating a pile in a fully drained soil subjected to horizontal loads using ABAQUS (as shown in Figure 1) and noticed from the monitor that the […] 
DIANA 10.5 new features
jesus mediavillaFinite Elements0 Views 4,308
DIANA 10.5 was released in 2021. It features many powerful capabilities to model soilstructure interection. See more in https://dianafea.com/2021DIANA105Release
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Connecting remote sensors to the Plaxis FEM 3D using python 26.7.2024
 Intergranular Strain Extensions 16.7.2024
 Abaqus Hypoplasticity Primary Variable Is Not Available 1.7.2024
 Vumat to calculate excess pore in Coupled EulerianLagrangian ABAQUS 1.7.2024
 Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model 20.6.2024
 Soil model for sand under drained cyclic loading 15.6.2024
 In Abaqus how do we use *DLOAD for defining both userdefined pressure and body force simultaneously? 15.6.2024
 Issue in applying SANISAND04 UMAT to BoundaryValueProblem 31.5.2024
 Triaxial compression test using MohrCoulomb model in Abaqus 27.5.2024
 The Mises stress calculated by the hypoplasticity model considering the intergranular strain is all 0 20.5.2024
 Degradation ( disturbance ) of hypoplastic clay 23.4.2024
 Degradation ( disturbance ) of hypoplastic clay 23.4.2024
Recent Comments
 Ismail Khan on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
 Tao Zhu on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
 Lei DAI on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
 Yu Xiao on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
 Yu Xiao on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
 Charbel NOHRA on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
 Pouya Zahedi on UMAT for hypoplastic subroutine
 Mohsen Misaghian on SANISAND umat issue
 Ashesh Choudhury on Abaqus
 Hu Shihong on Triaxial compression test using MohrCoulomb model in Abaqus
 Mert Eyupgiller on Triaxial compression test using MohrCoulomb model in Abaqus
 Bala Harsha Srusti on ABAQUS job doesn’t make any increment
 PRATIK GOEL on Hardening parameters (yield stress & absolute plastic strain)
 Ashraf AHMED on ExCalibre – SoilModels Automatic Calibration
 Xy Ma on Sand and clay standard datasets
 Xy Ma on Sand and clay standard datasets
 Ramon Varghese on Hypoplastic Interface Model: Does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D
 Jh Xue on UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines)
Dear Neif,
– Please first check the results of the first two steps to see whether they are sensible, even better you may compare them with results of some element test drivers from SoilModels: this will consfirm that you have properly set the parameters.
– Then make sure you subdivide the shear stage into many small steps. It is not clear from your post whether you use intergranular strain or not. In particular the istrain version may require small step size as there is significant stiffness change during loading.
– If the simulation crashes, it should produce error file (something like fort.1) where some crash information should be given. You may also see some messages in log files of Abaqus project, which could help to find the source of the problem.
Regards David
Dear Dr. David
– The intergranular strain concept was used with value δ=0.00001.
– The magnitude of axial stress that used at third step is 1.0 kPa.
– The type of steps is soils (transient)
– The time period and increment size of third step were 0.1, and 0.001 respectively.
In term of the results of analysis of first and second step, there was no change in void ratio.
the analysis is incomplete in third step.
I need for helping for this problem please?
Dear Neif,
It seems that the second step was failed if there was no void change.
Have you ever try a triaxial test with only one element?
I prefer to start with elementary tests without intergranular strain
Regards
Dear Wang
Thank you very much for your helping.
I considered your noting for modeling sample without intergranular strain, but the analysis was incomplete in step 3 (applying axial stress).
In term of void ratio, i mean that the void ratio in first step (applying confining pressure) is equal to the void ratio in second step (consolidation step). on other word, the value of void ratio is constant in first and second steps which is equal as the void ratio that set in initial condition.
Hi,
just a couple of observations:
Why are the bc in the lower side fixed in vertical and horizontal direction? You only need to fix them in the vertical direction (they must be free to move in the horizontal direction specially in the consolidation phase).
I would advise you to model this first with a 2D model in axial symmetrical conditions and without intergranular strain. Start with 1 element and then you can slowly increase the number of elements or even dimensions if you need it and afterwards add with the intergranular strain parameters.
If the void ratio did not change it means there is no volumetric deformation. This might be the case if the confinig phase is not modelled correctly (check if the stress state changes correctly) or if the sample is able to deform (drained conditions)
Good luck.
Dear Oscar
Thank for help. I considered your noting, but i have the same problem.
When Hypoplastic model were replaced by MohrCoulomb and elasticity, the analysis was completed and there were volume changes throughout steps.
When Hypoplastic model were used, and there were no drainage conditions at top and bottom of sample, the analysis was completed and here were no volume changes throughout steps.
Is there parameter in hypoplastic umat subroutine or in hypoplastic model (12 parameters) that control or prevent the volume change of the sample of triaxial?
I modeled initial void ratio as uniform value. If are there other method to model initial void ratio (predefined field), provide me this method please.
Hi Naif,
not to my knowledge. I have worked with the von Wolffersdorf hypoplastic model without a problem. I am thinking the problem lies in assigning the initial void ratio. You can check this value in Abaqus output by looking at the system defined variables (sdv).
Good luck solving your problem