I tried to model sample of triaxial test in Abaqus program. I used hypoplastic subroutine. The parameters used in hypoplastic model was Hochstetten sand the given in website “https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html”.
The used steps of analysis were as;
– First step is for applying confining pressure in the sample.
– Second step is for consolidation process (dissipation of excess pore pressure).
– Third step is applying deviator stress (axial stress).
The analysis was completed in first and second steps, but it was aborted in third step (note: the deviator stress was small).
Could anyone to solve this problem?
The boundary conditions are shown in attachments figures.
Modeling of triaxial test sample by using hypoplastic subroutine
Related Articles

ABAQUS Meshtomesh solution mapping with Modified Cam Clay
Samanthika LiyanapathiranaFinite Elements0 Views 255
I am using the meshtomesh solution mapping with MCC model. The element type used is CPE8RP. My initial analysis runs without any issue and when the deformations reach a certain […] 
Modeling of granular soil by using UMAT hypoplastic in Abaqus
Naif AlsanabaniFinite Elements5 Views 493
Dear all I am using the UMAT of hypoplastic model for simulation soil (3D modeling) under cyclic loading. The analysis was completed at geostatic step. But for consolidation step (soil, […] 
Hypoplastic model for thermal cycles (Abaqus)
Chiara IodiceFinite Elements2 Views 412
Dear all, I’m using the UMAT file in which the hypoplastic model for thermal cycles is implemented. In the Abaqus input file I have added the two lines necessary to […] 
How to replicate results for vertical cut in FEM program
Amine AboufirassFinite Elements0 Views 286
The equations for a vertical cut in cohesive material are given in several publications including Heyman (1973): The stability of a vertical cut (see attachment Equations1.jpeg) and Verruijt (2001) Soil […] 
Presentations on hypoplasticity applications, D. Mašín, NGI 2017
David MašínFinite Elements0 Views 1,643
Based on some requests, I share here two presentations on hypoplasticity applications. One is related to simulation of various boundary value problems, the other focuses on simulation of cyclic and […] 
Consolidation analysis using HP clay model in Plaxis
muhammad shakeelFinite Elements1 Views 420
Dear Prof David / SOil model community, I am performing coupled consolidation analysis for deep excavation in clay using HP clay model in Plaxis 3D. Performing the undrained analysis, the […] 
SANISAND dll
Emilio BilottaFinite Elements2 Views 364
Hi there, I’ve used successfully used SANISAND .dll with Plaxis 2016, but after switching to 2017 and now 2018 the .dll seems not to work (the parameter fields appear without […] 
Tochnog Professional becomes free
Dennis RoddemanFinite Elements0 Views 401
After several decades of development we are happy to announce that the Tochnog Professional finite element program has become free. Both for academic and commercial use. We are extremely grateful […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Intergranular strain concept modification 29.3.2020
 PhD position on thermohydromechanical coupling in slope stability (Charles University) 26.2.2020
 PhD position at Charles University on experimental investigation of thermally loaded bentonite 24.2.2020
 How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine 18.2.2020
 Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction 7.2.2020
Recent Comments
 Hashmi Sohawon on Hypoplasticity & Recent Stress History
 Geyang Song on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Hans Henning Stutz on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Le Chi Hung on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Geyang Song on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Arie Koot on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Geyang Song on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Hans Henning Stutz on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Geyang Song on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
 Arie Koot on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
 Philip Alkhoury on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
 Arie Koot on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
Dear Neif,
– Please first check the results of the first two steps to see whether they are sensible, even better you may compare them with results of some element test drivers from SoilModels: this will consfirm that you have properly set the parameters.
– Then make sure you subdivide the shear stage into many small steps. It is not clear from your post whether you use intergranular strain or not. In particular the istrain version may require small step size as there is significant stiffness change during loading.
– If the simulation crashes, it should produce error file (something like fort.1) where some crash information should be given. You may also see some messages in log files of Abaqus project, which could help to find the source of the problem.
Regards David
Dear Dr. David
– The intergranular strain concept was used with value δ=0.00001.
– The magnitude of axial stress that used at third step is 1.0 kPa.
– The type of steps is soils (transient)
– The time period and increment size of third step were 0.1, and 0.001 respectively.
In term of the results of analysis of first and second step, there was no change in void ratio.
the analysis is incomplete in third step.
I need for helping for this problem please?
Dear Neif,
It seems that the second step was failed if there was no void change.
Have you ever try a triaxial test with only one element?
I prefer to start with elementary tests without intergranular strain
Regards
Dear Wang
Thank you very much for your helping.
I considered your noting for modeling sample without intergranular strain, but the analysis was incomplete in step 3 (applying axial stress).
In term of void ratio, i mean that the void ratio in first step (applying confining pressure) is equal to the void ratio in second step (consolidation step). on other word, the value of void ratio is constant in first and second steps which is equal as the void ratio that set in initial condition.
Hi,
just a couple of observations:
Why are the bc in the lower side fixed in vertical and horizontal direction? You only need to fix them in the vertical direction (they must be free to move in the horizontal direction specially in the consolidation phase).
I would advise you to model this first with a 2D model in axial symmetrical conditions and without intergranular strain. Start with 1 element and then you can slowly increase the number of elements or even dimensions if you need it and afterwards add with the intergranular strain parameters.
If the void ratio did not change it means there is no volumetric deformation. This might be the case if the confinig phase is not modelled correctly (check if the stress state changes correctly) or if the sample is able to deform (drained conditions)
Good luck.
Dear Oscar
Thank for help. I considered your noting, but i have the same problem.
When Hypoplastic model were replaced by MohrCoulomb and elasticity, the analysis was completed and there were volume changes throughout steps.
When Hypoplastic model were used, and there were no drainage conditions at top and bottom of sample, the analysis was completed and here were no volume changes throughout steps.
Is there parameter in hypoplastic umat subroutine or in hypoplastic model (12 parameters) that control or prevent the volume change of the sample of triaxial?
I modeled initial void ratio as uniform value. If are there other method to model initial void ratio (predefined field), provide me this method please.
Hi Naif,
not to my knowledge. I have worked with the von Wolffersdorf hypoplastic model without a problem. I am thinking the problem lies in assigning the initial void ratio. You can check this value in Abaqus output by looking at the system defined variables (sdv).
Good luck solving your problem