I tried to model sample of triaxial test in Abaqus program. I used hypoplastic subroutine. The parameters used in hypoplastic model was Hochstetten sand the given in website “https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html”.
The used steps of analysis were as;
– First step is for applying confining pressure in the sample.
– Second step is for consolidation process (dissipation of excess pore pressure).
– Third step is applying deviator stress (axial stress).
The analysis was completed in first and second steps, but it was aborted in third step (note: the deviator stress was small).
Could anyone to solve this problem?
The boundary conditions are shown in attachments figures.
Modeling of triaxial test sample by using hypoplastic subroutine
Related Articles

How to replicate results for vertical cut in FEM program
Amine AboufirassFinite Elements0 Views 3,432
The equations for a vertical cut in cohesive material are given in several publications including Heyman (1973): The stability of a vertical cut (see attachment Equations1.jpeg) and Verruijt (2001) Soil […] 
hypoplasticity models in free Tochnog Professional
Silvia ImposimatoFinite Elements0 Views 3,547
In this post we will list builtin hypoplasticity formulations in the free Tochnog Professional program. Since these hypoplasticity options are builtin there is no need to link external umat routines. […] 
UMAT for hypoplastic subroutine
Naif AlsanabaniFinite Elements4 Views 4,001
Hello all, Could you please anyone provide me umat for Hypoplastic model that used as subroutine in Abqus 6.14. With Best Regards Naif Mohammed 
DIANA with monopile follows Blum theory saving 10 m of length
Ab van den bosFinite Elements0 Views 3,272
Where the client was forced to make all his horizontal loaded Dolphins (piles) 10 m longer we could trustworthy proof that this actually was not necessary saving millions of cost […] 
Example of FLAC3D data file
Kassem DibFinite Elements0 Views 1,946
Hello.. I am new in FLAC3D, could some send to me an example of data file code for pile soil interaction with seismic loads ? I will be thankful 
Analys soil liquefaction with Abaqus under blast load
Alex LiuFinite Elements0 Views 69
Dear all, I need to use ABAQUS to analyze the liquefaction of saturated soil under explosive load. How should I simulate this process? Currently I need the pore water pressure […] 
Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
an zhanngFinite Elements5 Views 1,293
I have a question regarding the simulation of cone penetration tests using the SANISAND04 model. I have observed that the parameter m (yield surface size）has a significant impact on the […] 
Presentations on hypoplasticity applications, D. Mašín, NGI 2017
David MašínFinite Elements0 Views 4,952
Based on some requests, I share here two presentations on hypoplasticity applications. One is related to simulation of various boundary value problems, the other focuses on simulation of cyclic and […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 BCV bentonite experimental and modelling datasets 14.11.2023
 Challenges in simulating geomechanical models using MohrCoulomb with Tension CutOff in Abaqus 20.10.2023
 Analys soil liquefaction with Abaqus under blast load 19.10.2023
 Hardening soil Model UMAT 13.9.2023
 Problem with VUMAT interface 20.8.2023
 UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p) 5.8.2023
 Oedometric Test Soil Test Plaxis 21.7.2023
 Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04 10.7.2023
 Problem with UMAT for clay hypoplasticity. Program exiting. 30.6.2023
 Example of FLAC3D data file 10.6.2023
 sigini ans sdvini subroutine example for soil model in Abaqus 6.6.2023
 Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias 25.5.2023
Recent Comments
 Johan Clausen on Challenges in simulating geomechanical models using MohrCoulomb with Tension CutOff in Abaqus
 Zhenyu Liu on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
 Dorsa Shadlou on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
 Shuo Feng on Download Package of Matlab Driver
 Ajay Jatoliya on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
 Isma Khabis on Hardening soil Model UMAT
 Anis Kheffache on Hardening soil Model UMAT
 Isma Khabis on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
 Fatemeh Safari on Matlab Driver
 KF JIAO on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Abdiel Ramon Leon Bal on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
 An Zhanng on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
 Giovanni Ciardi on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
 Anis Kheffache on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
 Giovanni Ciardi on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
 Anis Kheffache on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
 Giovanni Ciardi on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
 Anis Kheffache on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
Dear Neif,
– Please first check the results of the first two steps to see whether they are sensible, even better you may compare them with results of some element test drivers from SoilModels: this will consfirm that you have properly set the parameters.
– Then make sure you subdivide the shear stage into many small steps. It is not clear from your post whether you use intergranular strain or not. In particular the istrain version may require small step size as there is significant stiffness change during loading.
– If the simulation crashes, it should produce error file (something like fort.1) where some crash information should be given. You may also see some messages in log files of Abaqus project, which could help to find the source of the problem.
Regards David
Dear Dr. David
– The intergranular strain concept was used with value δ=0.00001.
– The magnitude of axial stress that used at third step is 1.0 kPa.
– The type of steps is soils (transient)
– The time period and increment size of third step were 0.1, and 0.001 respectively.
In term of the results of analysis of first and second step, there was no change in void ratio.
the analysis is incomplete in third step.
I need for helping for this problem please?
Dear Neif,
It seems that the second step was failed if there was no void change.
Have you ever try a triaxial test with only one element?
I prefer to start with elementary tests without intergranular strain
Regards
Dear Wang
Thank you very much for your helping.
I considered your noting for modeling sample without intergranular strain, but the analysis was incomplete in step 3 (applying axial stress).
In term of void ratio, i mean that the void ratio in first step (applying confining pressure) is equal to the void ratio in second step (consolidation step). on other word, the value of void ratio is constant in first and second steps which is equal as the void ratio that set in initial condition.
Hi,
just a couple of observations:
Why are the bc in the lower side fixed in vertical and horizontal direction? You only need to fix them in the vertical direction (they must be free to move in the horizontal direction specially in the consolidation phase).
I would advise you to model this first with a 2D model in axial symmetrical conditions and without intergranular strain. Start with 1 element and then you can slowly increase the number of elements or even dimensions if you need it and afterwards add with the intergranular strain parameters.
If the void ratio did not change it means there is no volumetric deformation. This might be the case if the confinig phase is not modelled correctly (check if the stress state changes correctly) or if the sample is able to deform (drained conditions)
Good luck.
Dear Oscar
Thank for help. I considered your noting, but i have the same problem.
When Hypoplastic model were replaced by MohrCoulomb and elasticity, the analysis was completed and there were volume changes throughout steps.
When Hypoplastic model were used, and there were no drainage conditions at top and bottom of sample, the analysis was completed and here were no volume changes throughout steps.
Is there parameter in hypoplastic umat subroutine or in hypoplastic model (12 parameters) that control or prevent the volume change of the sample of triaxial?
I modeled initial void ratio as uniform value. If are there other method to model initial void ratio (predefined field), provide me this method please.
Hi Naif,
not to my knowledge. I have worked with the von Wolffersdorf hypoplastic model without a problem. I am thinking the problem lies in assigning the initial void ratio. You can check this value in Abaqus output by looking at the system defined variables (sdv).
Good luck solving your problem