I tried to model sample of triaxial test in Abaqus program. I used hypoplastic subroutine. The parameters used in hypoplastic model was Hochstetten sand the given in website “https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html”.
The used steps of analysis were as;
– First step is for applying confining pressure in the sample.
– Second step is for consolidation process (dissipation of excess pore pressure).
– Third step is applying deviator stress (axial stress).
The analysis was completed in first and second steps, but it was aborted in third step (note: the deviator stress was small).
Could anyone to solve this problem?
The boundary conditions are shown in attachments figures.
Modeling of triaxial test sample by using hypoplastic subroutine
Related Articles

SANISAND 2008 model
MOHD SAQIBFinite Elements0 Views 217
Dear fellow, Anyone have SANISAND 2008 by Taiebat and Dafalias umat subroutine available for Abaqus. I have 2004 but I need 2008 one. 
Interface to study soilstructure interaction in Plaxis 3D (Clay Hypoplasticity)
Leon CortesFinite Elements6 Views 1,838
Hello, I am trying to simulate the behavior of helical anchors (also called screw anchors) using PLAXIS 3D and a clay hypoplasticity constitutive model. The helical anchor shaft is simulated […] 
Some confusion about the parameters in Abaqus umat of Hypoplastic Modeling
Joe ChuFinite Elements1 Views 183
Dear all, When I check the umat file of sand hypoplastic modeling, I find there are two parametesr(p_t(2), bulk_w(15)) without any definitions. Could someone kindly explain the exact meaning for […] 
ABAQUS Meshtomesh solution mapping with Modified Cam Clay
Samanthika LiyanapathiranaFinite Elements0 Views 482
I am using the meshtomesh solution mapping with MCC model. The element type used is CPE8RP. My initial analysis runs without any issue and when the deformations reach a certain […] 
finite element modeling of ISAHP for sand material
arad ahmadi radinFinite Elements1 Views 256
On the simulation of the cyclic mobility effect with an ISA hypoplastic hypoplastic hypoplastic model, is it possible to simulate 3D liquefiable sandy soil by available umat file which is […] 
Tochnog Professional 100 element free version, www.tochnogprofessional.nl
dennis roddemanFinite Elements0 Views 352
The Tochnog Professional finite element program is now available as free version with 100 elements. It can be downloaded without registration from http://www.tochnogprofessional.nl. Several commercial and free pre and postprocessors […] 
Barodesy download package including small strain stiffness and strength reduction (UMAT and PLAXIS dll)
Manuel BodeFinite Elements0 Views 291
A new download package for Clay Barodesy is available in the download section (https://soilmodels.com/barodesy/) The model uses the basic model of barodesy for clay (Medicus G. and Fellin W. 2017) […] 
Consolidation analysis using HP clay model in Plaxis
muhammad shakeelFinite Elements1 Views 581
Dear Prof David / SOil model community, I am performing coupled consolidation analysis for deep excavation in clay using HP clay model in Plaxis 3D. Performing the undrained analysis, the […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Interactive graphics of yield surfaces 30.4.2021
 Enhanced location search feature at SoilModels 30.4.2021
 How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below? 28.4.2021
 PHD Position on “Triggering and propagation of liquefaction in brittle geotechnical materials” at CIMNEUPC (Barcelona, Spain) 27.4.2021
 Guidance to newbie on how to calibrate a constitutive model 25.4.2021
 Oedometer tests on Ticino sand 8.4.2021
 PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D 30.3.2021
 Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
 K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
 Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
 Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog 11.2.2021
 Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model 8.2.2021
Recent Comments
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 MOHD SAQIB on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Setting of Kw for Hypoplastic Clay UDSM in Plaxis
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Hyposand UMAT problem
 Micha Van der Sloot on Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
 Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Silt software
 Daniel Valencia on PM4Silt software
 Yang Tang on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
 略轩 黄 on PLAXIS
Dear Neif,
– Please first check the results of the first two steps to see whether they are sensible, even better you may compare them with results of some element test drivers from SoilModels: this will consfirm that you have properly set the parameters.
– Then make sure you subdivide the shear stage into many small steps. It is not clear from your post whether you use intergranular strain or not. In particular the istrain version may require small step size as there is significant stiffness change during loading.
– If the simulation crashes, it should produce error file (something like fort.1) where some crash information should be given. You may also see some messages in log files of Abaqus project, which could help to find the source of the problem.
Regards David
Dear Dr. David
– The intergranular strain concept was used with value δ=0.00001.
– The magnitude of axial stress that used at third step is 1.0 kPa.
– The type of steps is soils (transient)
– The time period and increment size of third step were 0.1, and 0.001 respectively.
In term of the results of analysis of first and second step, there was no change in void ratio.
the analysis is incomplete in third step.
I need for helping for this problem please?
Dear Neif,
It seems that the second step was failed if there was no void change.
Have you ever try a triaxial test with only one element?
I prefer to start with elementary tests without intergranular strain
Regards
Dear Wang
Thank you very much for your helping.
I considered your noting for modeling sample without intergranular strain, but the analysis was incomplete in step 3 (applying axial stress).
In term of void ratio, i mean that the void ratio in first step (applying confining pressure) is equal to the void ratio in second step (consolidation step). on other word, the value of void ratio is constant in first and second steps which is equal as the void ratio that set in initial condition.
Hi,
just a couple of observations:
Why are the bc in the lower side fixed in vertical and horizontal direction? You only need to fix them in the vertical direction (they must be free to move in the horizontal direction specially in the consolidation phase).
I would advise you to model this first with a 2D model in axial symmetrical conditions and without intergranular strain. Start with 1 element and then you can slowly increase the number of elements or even dimensions if you need it and afterwards add with the intergranular strain parameters.
If the void ratio did not change it means there is no volumetric deformation. This might be the case if the confinig phase is not modelled correctly (check if the stress state changes correctly) or if the sample is able to deform (drained conditions)
Good luck.
Dear Oscar
Thank for help. I considered your noting, but i have the same problem.
When Hypoplastic model were replaced by MohrCoulomb and elasticity, the analysis was completed and there were volume changes throughout steps.
When Hypoplastic model were used, and there were no drainage conditions at top and bottom of sample, the analysis was completed and here were no volume changes throughout steps.
Is there parameter in hypoplastic umat subroutine or in hypoplastic model (12 parameters) that control or prevent the volume change of the sample of triaxial?
I modeled initial void ratio as uniform value. If are there other method to model initial void ratio (predefined field), provide me this method please.
Hi Naif,
not to my knowledge. I have worked with the von Wolffersdorf hypoplastic model without a problem. I am thinking the problem lies in assigning the initial void ratio. You can check this value in Abaqus output by looking at the system defined variables (sdv).
Good luck solving your problem