Dear all,
I’m trying to model multilayer soil in abaqus. To use the SaniSand umat in model I use the following parameters but no plastic strain at all. The unit system used is us(in). Are the input parameters incorrect?
Could anyone kindly help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!.
problem with sanisand umat
Related Articles
-
Abaqus vs Plaxis – Local Convergence Tolerances
Sina Azad||Finite Elements|1 |
Views 4,026
Hi, I have a question regarding local, material-level convergence tolerances in FE software, particularly Abaqus and Plaxis. I have experience using Abaqus but not much familiar with Plaxis. As shown […] -
Problem in GRPS embankment simulation In ABAQUS
Bidur Pathak||Finite Elements|0 |
Views 2,769
Hi, I am doing Plane strain 2D simulation of GRPS embankment in ABAQUS, i encountered a problem that results of with geogrid and without geogrid both are showing same deflection. […] -
UMAT for hypoplastic subroutine
Naif Alsanabani||Finite Elements|4 |
Views 3,510
Hello all, Could you please anyone provide me umat for Hypoplastic model that used as subroutine in Abqus 6.14. With Best Regards Naif Mohammed -
Interpreting results of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus VUMAT
arsalan Ahmad||Finite Elements|0 |
Views 3,092
Dear concern, Recently i have modelled the soil pile interaction using Abaqus CEL method. The hypoplastic behavior of the soil is model using user subroutine VUMAT. The properties of the […] -
ABAQUS job doesn’t make any increment
Abdullah Al-Rawabdeh||Finite Elements|0 |
Views 3,600
Hi, I’m facing a problem with my model. I’m trying to simulate a helical pile in soil. When I create the job, my job doesn’t make any increment and the […] -
ABAQUS Mesh-to-mesh solution mapping with Modified Cam Clay
Samanthika Liyanapathirana||Finite Elements|0 |
Views 3,303
I am using the mesh-to-mesh solution mapping with MCC model. The element type used is CPE8RP. My initial analysis runs without any issue and when the deformations reach a certain […] -
Modeling cyclic undrained sandy soil triaxial test using ABAQUS
Shile Dong||Finite Elements|3 |
Views 3,300
Dear all, I am trying to use Abaqus to modeling undrained cyclic triaxial test for liquefiable soil. I am wondering how could I applied the cyclic load. I should apply […] -
Tochnog Professional 100 element free version, www.tochnogprofessional.nl
dennis roddeman||Finite Elements|0 |
Views 3,005
The Tochnog Professional finite element program is now available as free version with 100 elements. It can be downloaded without registration from http://www.tochnogprofessional.nl. Several commercial and free pre- and postprocessors […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias 25.5.2023
-
Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus. 17.5.2023
-
An error in the SANISAND umat runtime 8.5.2023
-
Htypoplastic Model in Miidas GTS NX 25.4.2023
-
set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat 2.4.2023
-
FE formulation and software 25.3.2023
-
Multi-objective analysis of the Sand Hypoplasticity model calibration 24.3.2023
-
Problem with SANISAND UMAT 7.3.2023
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 (22nd – 23rd of May) with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Yannis Dafalias 28.2.2023
-
What is an appropriate damping model for dynamic liquefaction analysis of tailings storage facility in FLAC? 10.2.2023
-
Abaqus vs Plaxis – Local Convergence Tolerances 2.2.2023
-
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
Recent Comments
- Kassem Dib on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Isma Khabis on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Isma Khabis on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Kassem Dib on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Zhentao Liu on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
- Arie Koot on An error in the SANISAND umat runtime
Hey Yousef
The parameters look generally ok. Rather close to the original calibration of Dafalias & Manzari for Toyoura Sand. If you are using US units check if your G0 parameter, which is indeed unitless, is still 125 or is it different value.
Good luck
Piotr
Hello
Thank you for replay
G0 is a dimensionless constant, but by changing its value, PE is STEEL equal to zero.
Hey Yousef
As mentioned by Arie, PE is not calculated by the umat. It is calculated only by the constitutive models implemented in Abaqus. If you want to see if plastic strains occur from the umat, then read umat carefully and try to ask for your own output in log file. I am not sure if you can ask for the actual value of the plastic strain.
Piotr
What do you mean “no plastic strain”?
Sanisand umat does not calculate plastic strain: it is a kinematic hardening model with one backstress.
It only needs and calculates plastic strain rate.
Thank you for replay
PE in visualization always is zero
though with chang in load and b.c
is this correct؟
Or do you mean you miss plastic strain input?
Hardening behavior is described by the hardening parameters
i set depvar=36
and check pe in field output in step
and select umat in job
Something else needs to be done؟
select pe has no use: it is not calculated by sanisand.
You can select SDV output but then you get all 36 statevar. (you cannot select a few)
It will make your odb larger but it gives you more information.
c 1 … alpha_11 back stress, orientation of yield surface cone
c 2 … alpha_22
c 3 … alpha_33
c 4 … alpha_12
c 5 … alpha_13
c 6 … alpha_23
c
c 7 … void void ratio
c
c 8 … Fab_11 fabric tensor z
c 9 … Fab_22
c 10 … Fab_33
c 11 … Fab_12
c 12 … Fab_13
c 13 … Fab_23
c
c 14 … not used
c
c group 2: memory variables for shear reversal (SR) and other purposes
c
c 15 … alpha_sr_11 alpha value at stress reversal points (discrete update)
c 16 … alpha_sr_22
c 17 … alpha_sr_33
c 18 … alpha_sr_12
c 19 … alpha_sr_13
c 20 … alpha_sr_23
c
c 21 … not used
c 22 … not used
c 23 … not used
c 24 … not used
c 25 … not used
c 26 … not used
c 27 … not used
c
c 28 … not used
c
c group 3: variables saved for post processing or other purposes
c
c 29 … pore excess pore pressure (undrained case)
c 30 … p mean effective stress
c 31 … q deviator stress
c 32 … z Lode parameter (cos(3theta))
c 33 … dtsub suggested size of first time substep
c 34 … nfev number of function evaluation
c 35 … not used
c 36 … not used
c