Dear all,
I’m trying to model multilayer soil in abaqus. To use the SaniSand umat in model I use the following parameters but no plastic strain at all. The unit system used is us(in). Are the input parameters incorrect?
Could anyone kindly help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!.
problem with sanisand umat
Related Articles

ABAQUS Meshtomesh solution mapping with Modified Cam Clay
Samanthika LiyanapathiranaFinite Elements0 Views 612
I am using the meshtomesh solution mapping with MCC model. The element type used is CPE8RP. My initial analysis runs without any issue and when the deformations reach a certain […] 

DIANA 10.4 released with full Geotechnical possibilities 3D as always, but now also 2D!
Ab van den bosFinite Elements0 Views 367
We are pleased to announce that DIANA 10.4 is released with full 2D geotechnical possibilities. DIANA is already easy to use for full 3D geotechnical models, and now the more […] 
Consideration of Ko using HP clay model
muhammad shakeelFinite Elements1 Views 396
Dear SoilModels community Dear Prof. Masin / all I want to know how HP model considers Ko variation for the following cases: Ko with variation with OCR? Ko determination related […] 
ABAQUSUMAT Help
Mehmet GocmezFinite Elements2 Views 364
Hi everyone, I would like to ask if anyone has an example umat file for me to study to work on my master thesis researches. I would like to create […] 
liquefaction simulation with abaqus
Ruibin HouFinite Elements3 Views 805
Hello, everyone I am an abaqus user and developer. Recently, I want to simulating the liquefaction phenomenon with abaqus/standard or abaqus/explicit. As I know, this cannot be realized using the […] 
PM4Silt software
Daniel ValenciaFinite Elements5 Views 362
Hello everybody, Does somebody know a FEM Software with the implementation of PM4Silt model’s routine? I mean, one different from FLAC. Thanks for your help. 
Plaxis 3D Tunnel
Mesut DemirFinite Elements0 Views 542
Hi Everybody, I would like to ask an error problem where I am getting while using Plaxis 3D tunnel V 1.2. Previously I was using the software with Windows 7 […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Vibration foundation behavior 16.10.2021
 Getting started with UMAT for Hypoplastic clay model in ABAQUS 15.10.2021
 consistent tangent stiffness calculation in hypoplasticity sand UMAT 7.10.2021
 stress order in hypo umat seems to be incorrect 6.10.2021
 ALERT doctoral school on constitutive modelling – hands on session triax input files 2.10.2021
 Initial Stiffness of CU test in Masin’s 2014 Model 29.9.2021
 CONSTUTUTIVE MODELLING 22.9.2021
 Compatibility of subroutines in ABQ2021 17.9.2021
 Hypoplasticity sand convergence issues 17.9.2021
 MATLAB Code for Bounding Surface Plasticity Model 17.9.2021
 Non convergence problem in abaqus using hpoeca Clay Hypoplasticity in slope model 16.9.2021
 UMAT file for POROELASTICITY 31.8.2021
Recent Comments
 Kyeong Sun Kim on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
 Ran Tu on consistent tangent stiffness calculation in hypoplasticity sand UMAT
 Francisco Mendez on Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms
 David Mašín on stress order in hypo umat seems to be incorrect
 Ran Tu on stress order in hypo umat seems to be incorrect
 David Mašín on stress order in hypo umat seems to be incorrect
 Gertraud Medicus on Animating Soil Models
 A S M RIYAD on Animating Soil Models
 Gertraud Medicus on Animating Soil Models
 A S M RIYAD on Animating Soil Models
 Shen Wang on Initial Stiffness of CU test in Masin’s 2014 Model
 Francisco Mendez on Download Package of Incremental Driver
 Gertraud Medicus on Animating Soil Models
 Alan Jaret Aparicio Ortube on Triax element test driver
 Riccardo Zabatta on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Erick Kencana on Compatibility of subroutines in ABQ2021
 Yang Xue on Non convergence problem in abaqus using hpoeca Clay Hypoplasticity in slope model
 Shen Wang on Non convergence problem in abaqus using hpoeca Clay Hypoplasticity in slope model
Hey Yousef
The parameters look generally ok. Rather close to the original calibration of Dafalias & Manzari for Toyoura Sand. If you are using US units check if your G0 parameter, which is indeed unitless, is still 125 or is it different value.
Good luck
Piotr
Hello
Thank you for replay
G0 is a dimensionless constant, but by changing its value, PE is STEEL equal to zero.
Hey Yousef
As mentioned by Arie, PE is not calculated by the umat. It is calculated only by the constitutive models implemented in Abaqus. If you want to see if plastic strains occur from the umat, then read umat carefully and try to ask for your own output in log file. I am not sure if you can ask for the actual value of the plastic strain.
Piotr
What do you mean “no plastic strain”?
Sanisand umat does not calculate plastic strain: it is a kinematic hardening model with one backstress.
It only needs and calculates plastic strain rate.
Thank you for replay
PE in visualization always is zero
though with chang in load and b.c
is this correct؟
Or do you mean you miss plastic strain input?
Hardening behavior is described by the hardening parameters
i set depvar=36
and check pe in field output in step
and select umat in job
Something else needs to be done؟
select pe has no use: it is not calculated by sanisand.
You can select SDV output but then you get all 36 statevar. (you cannot select a few)
It will make your odb larger but it gives you more information.
c 1 … alpha_11 back stress, orientation of yield surface cone
c 2 … alpha_22
c 3 … alpha_33
c 4 … alpha_12
c 5 … alpha_13
c 6 … alpha_23
c
c 7 … void void ratio
c
c 8 … Fab_11 fabric tensor z
c 9 … Fab_22
c 10 … Fab_33
c 11 … Fab_12
c 12 … Fab_13
c 13 … Fab_23
c
c 14 … not used
c
c group 2: memory variables for shear reversal (SR) and other purposes
c
c 15 … alpha_sr_11 alpha value at stress reversal points (discrete update)
c 16 … alpha_sr_22
c 17 … alpha_sr_33
c 18 … alpha_sr_12
c 19 … alpha_sr_13
c 20 … alpha_sr_23
c
c 21 … not used
c 22 … not used
c 23 … not used
c 24 … not used
c 25 … not used
c 26 … not used
c 27 … not used
c
c 28 … not used
c
c group 3: variables saved for post processing or other purposes
c
c 29 … pore excess pore pressure (undrained case)
c 30 … p mean effective stress
c 31 … q deviator stress
c 32 … z Lode parameter (cos(3theta))
c 33 … dtsub suggested size of first time substep
c 34 … nfev number of function evaluation
c 35 … not used
c 36 … not used
c