Dear all,
I’m trying to model multilayer soil in abaqus. To use the SaniSand umat in model I use the following parameters but no plastic strain at all. The unit system used is us(in). Are the input parameters incorrect?
Could anyone kindly help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!.
problem with sanisand umat
Related Articles

hypoplasticity models in free Tochnog Professional
Silvia ImposimatoFinite Elements0 Views 281
In this post we will list builtin hypoplasticity formulations in the free Tochnog Professional program. Since these hypoplasticity options are builtin there is no need to link external umat routines. […] 
Interface to study soilstructure interaction in Plaxis 3D (Clay Hypoplasticity)
Leon CortesFinite Elements6 Views 913
Hello, I am trying to simulate the behavior of helical anchors (also called screw anchors) using PLAXIS 3D and a clay hypoplasticity constitutive model. The helical anchor shaft is simulated […] 
Plaxis 3D Tunnel
Mesut DemirFinite Elements0 Views 335
Hi Everybody, I would like to ask an error problem where I am getting while using Plaxis 3D tunnel V 1.2. Previously I was using the software with Windows 7 […] 
DIANA with monopile follows Blum theory saving 10 m of length
Ab van den bosFinite Elements0 Views 131
Where the client was forced to make all his horizontal loaded Dolphins (piles) 10 m longer we could trustworthy proof that this actually was not necessary saving millions of cost […] 
Some confusion about the parameters in Abaqus umat of Hypoplastic Modeling
Joe ChuFinite Elements1 Views 123
Dear all, When I check the umat file of sand hypoplastic modeling, I find there are two parametesr(p_t(2), bulk_w(15)) without any definitions. Could someone kindly explain the exact meaning for […] 
A problem of convergence from using Hypoplastic model in Abaqus
Joe ChuFinite Elements4 Views 173
Dear all, The sand hypoplastic model has been used to simulate the interaction between soil and pile. However, there is a bad convergence in the process of calculation. When I […] 
How to replicate results for vertical cut in FEM program
Amine AboufirassFinite Elements0 Views 286
The equations for a vertical cut in cohesive material are given in several publications including Heyman (1973): The stability of a vertical cut (see attachment Equations1.jpeg) and Verruijt (2001) Soil […] 
new hypoplasticity laws in Tochnog Professional
dennis roddemanFinite Elements0 Views 233
The 2014 Masin hypoplasticity for clays has been implemented in Tochnog Professional under guidance of Dr. David Masin. This implementation includes structure, intergranular strains and visco effects. Extensions to the […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Intergranular strain concept modification 29.3.2020
 PhD position on thermohydromechanical coupling in slope stability (Charles University) 26.2.2020
 PhD position at Charles University on experimental investigation of thermally loaded bentonite 24.2.2020
 How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine 18.2.2020
 Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction 7.2.2020
Recent Comments
 Hashmi Sohawon on Hypoplasticity & Recent Stress History
 Geyang Song on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Hans Henning Stutz on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Le Chi Hung on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Geyang Song on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Arie Koot on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Geyang Song on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Hans Henning Stutz on How to implement this Hypoplastic Interface Model into ABAQUS combined with the existing hypoplastic model subroutine
 Geyang Song on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
 Arie Koot on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
 Philip Alkhoury on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
 Arie Koot on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soilmonopile interaction
Hey Yousef
The parameters look generally ok. Rather close to the original calibration of Dafalias & Manzari for Toyoura Sand. If you are using US units check if your G0 parameter, which is indeed unitless, is still 125 or is it different value.
Good luck
Piotr
Hello
Thank you for replay
G0 is a dimensionless constant, but by changing its value, PE is STEEL equal to zero.
Hey Yousef
As mentioned by Arie, PE is not calculated by the umat. It is calculated only by the constitutive models implemented in Abaqus. If you want to see if plastic strains occur from the umat, then read umat carefully and try to ask for your own output in log file. I am not sure if you can ask for the actual value of the plastic strain.
Piotr
What do you mean “no plastic strain”?
Sanisand umat does not calculate plastic strain: it is a kinematic hardening model with one backstress.
It only needs and calculates plastic strain rate.
Thank you for replay
PE in visualization always is zero
though with chang in load and b.c
is this correct؟
Or do you mean you miss plastic strain input?
Hardening behavior is described by the hardening parameters
i set depvar=36
and check pe in field output in step
and select umat in job
Something else needs to be done؟
select pe has no use: it is not calculated by sanisand.
You can select SDV output but then you get all 36 statevar. (you cannot select a few)
It will make your odb larger but it gives you more information.
c 1 … alpha_11 back stress, orientation of yield surface cone
c 2 … alpha_22
c 3 … alpha_33
c 4 … alpha_12
c 5 … alpha_13
c 6 … alpha_23
c
c 7 … void void ratio
c
c 8 … Fab_11 fabric tensor z
c 9 … Fab_22
c 10 … Fab_33
c 11 … Fab_12
c 12 … Fab_13
c 13 … Fab_23
c
c 14 … not used
c
c group 2: memory variables for shear reversal (SR) and other purposes
c
c 15 … alpha_sr_11 alpha value at stress reversal points (discrete update)
c 16 … alpha_sr_22
c 17 … alpha_sr_33
c 18 … alpha_sr_12
c 19 … alpha_sr_13
c 20 … alpha_sr_23
c
c 21 … not used
c 22 … not used
c 23 … not used
c 24 … not used
c 25 … not used
c 26 … not used
c 27 … not used
c
c 28 … not used
c
c group 3: variables saved for post processing or other purposes
c
c 29 … pore excess pore pressure (undrained case)
c 30 … p mean effective stress
c 31 … q deviator stress
c 32 … z Lode parameter (cos(3theta))
c 33 … dtsub suggested size of first time substep
c 34 … nfev number of function evaluation
c 35 … not used
c 36 … not used
c