Dear all,
I’m trying to model multilayer soil in abaqus. To use the SaniSand umat in model I use the following parameters but no plastic strain at all. The unit system used is us(in). Are the input parameters incorrect?
Could anyone kindly help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!.
problem with sanisand umat
Related Articles
-
Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity
Shen Wang||Finite Elements|4 |Views 3,990
Hello, I am using clay hypoplastic umat code and trying to verify the code with the simulation on the paper of Prof. Masin. I found in the paper (Masin, 2005, […] -
Plaxis 3D Tunnel
Mesut Demir||Finite Elements|0 |Views 3,922
Hi Everybody, I would like to ask an error problem where I am getting while using Plaxis 3D tunnel V 1.2. Previously I was using the software with Windows 7 […] -
ABAQUS job doesn’t make any increment
Abdullah Al-Rawabdeh||Finite Elements|1 |Views 4,609
Hi, I’m facing a problem with my model. I’m trying to simulate a helical pile in soil. When I create the job, my job doesn’t make any increment and the […] -
set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat
Zhentao Liu||Finite Elements|6 |Views 3,362
Dear all I am recently working on the mechanical characteristics of large diameter monopiles under horizontal loads.The numerical simulation part of this project was carried out in ABAQUS/STANDARD and for […] -
Calibrate hypoplastic model
sahar saab||Finite Elements|2 |Views 3,640
I am trying to calibrate my sand using Excalibre. I tried some triaxial element tests using Abaqus. However the results are different between Excalibre and Abaqus. -
Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading
MOHD SAQIB||Finite Elements|1 |Views 3,540
Dear All, Hope you all well, I have been searching for some good publications on the Boundary value problems on Foundation system with granular materials subjected to earthquake loading or […] -
Connecting remote sensors to the Plaxis FEM 3D using python
Amir Farshadfar||Finite Elements|0 |Views 4,544
Dear I want to connect remote sensors to my engineering software Plaxis FEM 3D. Some days ago I was able to connect the python to the Plaxis FEM 3D, but […] -
SANISAND dll
Emilio Bilotta||Finite Elements|2 |Views 3,969
Hi there, I’ve used successfully used SANISAND .dll with Plaxis 2016, but after switching to 2017 and now 2018 the .dll seems not to work (the parameter fields appear without […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
- Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus 2.1.2025
- hypoplastic interface 11.12.2024
- Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND 30.10.2024
- REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING 23.10.2024
- Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic 11.10.2024
- Connecting remote sensors to the Plaxis FEM 3D using python 26.7.2024
- Intergranular Strain Extensions 16.7.2024
- Abaqus Hypoplasticity Primary Variable Is Not Available 1.7.2024
- Vumat to calculate excess pore in Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian ABAQUS 1.7.2024
- Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model 20.6.2024
- Soil model for sand under drained cyclic loading 15.6.2024
- In Abaqus how do we use *DLOAD for defining both user-defined pressure and body force simultaneously? 15.6.2024
Recent Comments
- Xiuzhe Wang on Hypoplasticity sand convergence issues
- Zheng Wanying on Example of FLAC3D data file
- Zheng Wanying on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Anis Kheffache on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- Kiruthika Perumal on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- Shishir Kumar Sikder Amit on Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
- Zhentao Liu on Hypoplasticity sand convergence issues
- Zhentao Liu on Combining Hypoplastic-sand and Hypoplastic-clay in one UMAT file
- Sumin Song on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMAT-Plaxis interface
- KHA DIDJA on Issue in applying SANISAND04 UMAT to Boundary-Value-Problem
- Zhentao Liu on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
- Jin-Hu Li on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
- Johan Clausen on Triaxial compression test using Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus
- Ismail Khan on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Tao Zhu on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Lei DAI on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Yu Xiao on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
Hey Yousef
The parameters look generally ok. Rather close to the original calibration of Dafalias & Manzari for Toyoura Sand. If you are using US units check if your G0 parameter, which is indeed unitless, is still 125 or is it different value.
Good luck
Piotr
Hello
Thank you for replay
G0 is a dimensionless constant, but by changing its value, PE is STEEL equal to zero.
Hey Yousef
As mentioned by Arie, PE is not calculated by the umat. It is calculated only by the constitutive models implemented in Abaqus. If you want to see if plastic strains occur from the umat, then read umat carefully and try to ask for your own output in log file. I am not sure if you can ask for the actual value of the plastic strain.
Piotr
What do you mean “no plastic strain”?
Sanisand umat does not calculate plastic strain: it is a kinematic hardening model with one backstress.
It only needs and calculates plastic strain rate.
Thank you for replay
PE in visualization always is zero
though with chang in load and b.c
is this correct؟
Or do you mean you miss plastic strain input?
Hardening behavior is described by the hardening parameters
i set depvar=36
and check pe in field output in step
and select umat in job
Something else needs to be done؟
select pe has no use: it is not calculated by sanisand.
You can select SDV output but then you get all 36 statevar. (you cannot select a few)
It will make your odb larger but it gives you more information.
c 1 … alpha_11 back stress, orientation of yield surface cone
c 2 … alpha_22
c 3 … alpha_33
c 4 … alpha_12
c 5 … alpha_13
c 6 … alpha_23
c
c 7 … void void ratio
c
c 8 … Fab_11 fabric tensor z
c 9 … Fab_22
c 10 … Fab_33
c 11 … Fab_12
c 12 … Fab_13
c 13 … Fab_23
c
c 14 … not used
c
c group 2: memory variables for shear reversal (SR) and other purposes
c
c 15 … alpha_sr_11 alpha value at stress reversal points (discrete update)
c 16 … alpha_sr_22
c 17 … alpha_sr_33
c 18 … alpha_sr_12
c 19 … alpha_sr_13
c 20 … alpha_sr_23
c
c 21 … not used
c 22 … not used
c 23 … not used
c 24 … not used
c 25 … not used
c 26 … not used
c 27 … not used
c
c 28 … not used
c
c group 3: variables saved for post processing or other purposes
c
c 29 … pore excess pore pressure (undrained case)
c 30 … p mean effective stress
c 31 … q deviator stress
c 32 … z Lode parameter (cos(3theta))
c 33 … dtsub suggested size of first time substep
c 34 … nfev number of function evaluation
c 35 … not used
c 36 … not used
c