Dear all,
I’m trying to model multilayer soil in abaqus. To use the SaniSand umat in model I use the following parameters but no plastic strain at all. The unit system used is us(in). Are the input parameters incorrect?
Could anyone kindly help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!.
problem with sanisand umat
Related Articles
-
Tochnog Professional overview movie in youtube
Dennis Roddeman||Finite Elements|0 |Views 4,259
Dear All, We posted a small overview movie of Tochnog Professional in YouTube. For more movies see the complete channel. -
Hypoplastic model for clays in a Plaxis 2D simulation – Problem
Daniel Valencia||Finite Elements|2 |Views 4,494
Hello everybody, Using Hypoplastic model for clays, with intergranular concept parameters, I am simulating a simple oedometer test, phase by phase, using a dummy layer on the top of the […] -
Issue in applying SANISAND04 UMAT to Boundary-Value-Problem
Bala Harsha Srusti||Finite Elements|1 |Views 2,581
Hi All, I am currently working on a research problem involving the implementation of the SANISAND04 UMAT (Soil models) in Abaqus for embankment analysis. While I have successfully tested the […] -
Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity
Shen Wang||Finite Elements|4 |Views 4,804
Hello, I am using clay hypoplastic umat code and trying to verify the code with the simulation on the paper of Prof. Masin. I found in the paper (Masin, 2005, […] -
Free Tochnog Professional list of capabilities and papers
Dennis Roddeman||Finite Elements|0 |Views 4,271
Dear All, you can find a list with some of Tochnog Professional capabilities and application papers at: http://www.tochnogprofessional.nl/Tochnog_Professional_wikipedia_format.pdf Stay safe, Dennis Roddeman -
Geostatic method for Abaqus/Explicit
Joe Chu||Finite Elements|3 |Views 7,039
Dear all, I recently conducted a numerical simulation of pile-soil interaction. I digged a vertical hole and insert the pile into that with general contact. Due to many reasons, I […] -
UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines)
Lovinder Mann||Finite Elements|4 |Views 5,559
Hi, I am working in Abaqus, aiming to model double porosity clay consolidation data by using hypoplastic clay model with meta stable structure. First, i just wanted to verify basic […] -
Modeling of triaxial test sample by using hypoplastic subroutine
Naif Alsanabani||Finite Elements|7 |Views 5,306
I tried to model sample of triaxial test in Abaqus program. I used hypoplastic subroutine. The parameters used in hypoplastic model was Hochstetten sand the given in website “https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html”. The […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Animating Soil Mechanics 3.7.2026
-
GeoXPM 19.6.2026
-
Autumn School in Soil Modelling at NTNU 16.6.2026
-
Viscohypoplastic bentonite (VIBE) model 28.5.2026
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
Recent Comments
- Nabanita Saha on SANISAND pile-soil-interaction ABAQUS
- Hongjie Zhou on ExCalibre – SoilModels Automatic Calibration
- Ding Yan on Download package of a complete dataset “Karlsruhe Kaolin – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)”
- Arie Koot on mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface
- Arie Koot on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Amir F on Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software
- Nabanita Saha on set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat
- Nabanita Saha on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Tian Fapai on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Heng Wang on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Zhang Hongwei on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Ruimin Chen on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Nitesh Bhume on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Aleksandar Kostadinovic on Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
- Amrane Moussa on Kadlíček, T., Ochmański, M., Mašín, D. and Duque, J. (2022) Report on Charles University implementation of high cycle accumulation model
- Ramon Varghese on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Shuhan Cao on Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
- Kuikui Guigui on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)








Hey Yousef
The parameters look generally ok. Rather close to the original calibration of Dafalias & Manzari for Toyoura Sand. If you are using US units check if your G0 parameter, which is indeed unitless, is still 125 or is it different value.
Good luck
Piotr
Hello
Thank you for replay
G0 is a dimensionless constant, but by changing its value, PE is STEEL equal to zero.
Hey Yousef
As mentioned by Arie, PE is not calculated by the umat. It is calculated only by the constitutive models implemented in Abaqus. If you want to see if plastic strains occur from the umat, then read umat carefully and try to ask for your own output in log file. I am not sure if you can ask for the actual value of the plastic strain.
Piotr
What do you mean “no plastic strain”?
Sanisand umat does not calculate plastic strain: it is a kinematic hardening model with one backstress.
It only needs and calculates plastic strain rate.
Thank you for replay
PE in visualization always is zero
though with chang in load and b.c
is this correct؟
Or do you mean you miss plastic strain input?
Hardening behavior is described by the hardening parameters
i set depvar=36
and check pe in field output in step
and select umat in job
Something else needs to be done؟
select pe has no use: it is not calculated by sanisand.
You can select SDV output but then you get all 36 statevar. (you cannot select a few)
It will make your odb larger but it gives you more information.
c 1 … alpha_11 back stress, orientation of yield surface cone
c 2 … alpha_22
c 3 … alpha_33
c 4 … alpha_12
c 5 … alpha_13
c 6 … alpha_23
c
c 7 … void void ratio
c
c 8 … Fab_11 fabric tensor z
c 9 … Fab_22
c 10 … Fab_33
c 11 … Fab_12
c 12 … Fab_13
c 13 … Fab_23
c
c 14 … not used
c
c group 2: memory variables for shear reversal (SR) and other purposes
c
c 15 … alpha_sr_11 alpha value at stress reversal points (discrete update)
c 16 … alpha_sr_22
c 17 … alpha_sr_33
c 18 … alpha_sr_12
c 19 … alpha_sr_13
c 20 … alpha_sr_23
c
c 21 … not used
c 22 … not used
c 23 … not used
c 24 … not used
c 25 … not used
c 26 … not used
c 27 … not used
c
c 28 … not used
c
c group 3: variables saved for post processing or other purposes
c
c 29 … pore excess pore pressure (undrained case)
c 30 … p mean effective stress
c 31 … q deviator stress
c 32 … z Lode parameter (cos(3theta))
c 33 … dtsub suggested size of first time substep
c 34 … nfev number of function evaluation
c 35 … not used
c 36 … not used
c