Dear all,
I’m trying to model multilayer soil in abaqus. To use the SaniSand umat in model I use the following parameters but no plastic strain at all. The unit system used is us(in). Are the input parameters incorrect?
Could anyone kindly help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!.
problem with sanisand umat
Related Articles

Boundary value problems for granular materials subjected to earthquake loading
MOHD SAQIBFinite Elements1 Views 178
Dear All, Hope you all well, I have been searching for some good publications on the Boundary value problems on Foundation system with granular materials subjected to earthquake loading or […] 
HP clay subroutine in Plaxis
muhammad shakeelFinite Elements5 Views 450
Dear Prof. Masin and Soil Model Community, I am using HP clay subroutine in Plaxis 3D to simulate soil structure interaction problem. I want void ratio and OCR variation along […] 
Geostatic method for Abaqus/Explicit
Joe ChuFinite Elements2 Views 773
Dear all, I recently conducted a numerical simulation of pilesoil interaction. I digged a vertical hole and insert the pile into that with general contact. Due to many reasons, I […] 
ABAQUS modeling: Warning about unconnected regions when using hypoplasticity subroutine
Jasmine LokeshFinite Elements0 Views 725
I ran a simple 3D model with symmetry boundary conditions first using elastic material and then as hypoplastic using a subroutine. However, in the former case, I don’t get the […] 
Seismic Liquifaction
MOHD SAQIBFinite Elements2 Views 327
Hello All, I am trying to simulate the seismic liquefaction in Abaqus. Can you please help me to model this. Best Regards’ Saqib 
Small displacements when using HP model in Plaxis 3D
Arno CrousFinite Elements4 Views 101
I am modelling sand slopes in Plaxis 3D using an HP model. I am using soil parameters from “Modelling of Soil Behaviour with Hypoplasticity” by David Masin (2019). During the […] 
Slope stability calculation with hypoplasticity using phic reduction available now in download section
David MašínFinite Elements0 Views 520
The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity now available 
SANISAND umat issue
Philip AlkhouryFinite Elements1 Views 260
Hello everyone; I have implemented the Sanisand constitutive model (UMAT) in abaqus in the scope of performing a dynamic analysis on a 3D soilpile interaction problem. I have succeded in […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Interactive graphics of yield surfaces 30.4.2021
 Enhanced location search feature at SoilModels 30.4.2021
 How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below? 28.4.2021
 PHD Position on “Triggering and propagation of liquefaction in brittle geotechnical materials” at CIMNEUPC (Barcelona, Spain) 27.4.2021
 Guidance to newbie on how to calibrate a constitutive model 25.4.2021
 Oedometer tests on Ticino sand 8.4.2021
 PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D 30.3.2021
 Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
 K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
 Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
 Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog 11.2.2021
 Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model 8.2.2021
Recent Comments
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 MOHD SAQIB on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Setting of Kw for Hypoplastic Clay UDSM in Plaxis
 Sudipta Bhowmick on Hyposand UMAT problem
 Micha Van der Sloot on Soft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
 Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Silt software
 Daniel Valencia on PM4Silt software
 Yang Tang on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
 略轩 黄 on PLAXIS
Hey Yousef
The parameters look generally ok. Rather close to the original calibration of Dafalias & Manzari for Toyoura Sand. If you are using US units check if your G0 parameter, which is indeed unitless, is still 125 or is it different value.
Good luck
Piotr
Hello
Thank you for replay
G0 is a dimensionless constant, but by changing its value, PE is STEEL equal to zero.
Hey Yousef
As mentioned by Arie, PE is not calculated by the umat. It is calculated only by the constitutive models implemented in Abaqus. If you want to see if plastic strains occur from the umat, then read umat carefully and try to ask for your own output in log file. I am not sure if you can ask for the actual value of the plastic strain.
Piotr
What do you mean “no plastic strain”?
Sanisand umat does not calculate plastic strain: it is a kinematic hardening model with one backstress.
It only needs and calculates plastic strain rate.
Thank you for replay
PE in visualization always is zero
though with chang in load and b.c
is this correct؟
Or do you mean you miss plastic strain input?
Hardening behavior is described by the hardening parameters
i set depvar=36
and check pe in field output in step
and select umat in job
Something else needs to be done؟
select pe has no use: it is not calculated by sanisand.
You can select SDV output but then you get all 36 statevar. (you cannot select a few)
It will make your odb larger but it gives you more information.
c 1 … alpha_11 back stress, orientation of yield surface cone
c 2 … alpha_22
c 3 … alpha_33
c 4 … alpha_12
c 5 … alpha_13
c 6 … alpha_23
c
c 7 … void void ratio
c
c 8 … Fab_11 fabric tensor z
c 9 … Fab_22
c 10 … Fab_33
c 11 … Fab_12
c 12 … Fab_13
c 13 … Fab_23
c
c 14 … not used
c
c group 2: memory variables for shear reversal (SR) and other purposes
c
c 15 … alpha_sr_11 alpha value at stress reversal points (discrete update)
c 16 … alpha_sr_22
c 17 … alpha_sr_33
c 18 … alpha_sr_12
c 19 … alpha_sr_13
c 20 … alpha_sr_23
c
c 21 … not used
c 22 … not used
c 23 … not used
c 24 … not used
c 25 … not used
c 26 … not used
c 27 … not used
c
c 28 … not used
c
c group 3: variables saved for post processing or other purposes
c
c 29 … pore excess pore pressure (undrained case)
c 30 … p mean effective stress
c 31 … q deviator stress
c 32 … z Lode parameter (cos(3theta))
c 33 … dtsub suggested size of first time substep
c 34 … nfev number of function evaluation
c 35 … not used
c 36 … not used
c