Related Articles
-
Karlsruhe Kaolin – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
This Karlsruhe Kaolin dataset consists of numerous undrained monotonic and cyclic triaxial and oedometric tests with stress or strain cycles applied to samples consolidated isotropically or anisotropically. -
Malaysian kaolin – Cyclic tests by Charles University
Experimental investigation on Malaysian kaolin under monotonic and cyclic loading: inspection of undrained Miner’s rule and drained cyclic preloading -
Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
This Karlsruhe fine sand dataset consists of numerous undrained monotonic and cyclic triaxial and oedometric tests with stress or strain cycles applied to samples consolidated isotropically or anisotropically. -
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University
Experimental investigation on Malaysian kaolin under monotonic and cyclic loading: inspection of undrained Miner’s rule and drained cyclic preloading -
BCV bentonite experimental and modelling datasets
Experimental investigation on Malaysian kaolin under monotonic and cyclic loading: inspection of undrained Miner’s rule and drained cyclic preloading
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Animating Soil Mechanics 3.7.2026
-
GeoXPM 19.6.2026
-
Autumn School in Soil Modelling at NTNU 16.6.2026
-
Viscohypoplastic bentonite (VIBE) model 28.5.2026
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
Thanks for the quality data! That’s very useful
Hi Prof. Masin,
Thanks for the data, much appreciated! I would like to point out that for Komorany Sand the parameters here are incorrect when compared to your recent book: Modelling of Soil Behaviour with Hypoplasticity (2019), p. 101.
Regards,
Joshua Schorr
This dataset is really amazing! But there is a significant issue that I would like to consult with the experts. The problem is that for clay, the parameter λ of both constitutive models is the slope of the isotropic compression line, but why is the parameter so different for the same soil?
oh，sorry，i got it