Hi everyone:
I am trying to use SANISAND as the constitutive model of soil, and use ABAQUS software to simulate pile-soil interaction. Is it better to choose “Static, Genaral” analysis step is suitable for analysis, or “Soils” analysis step is more suitable?
Related Articles
-
Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
Dear all, does anyone have the umat code for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus? For my current work I need a umat for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus. It would be highly […] -
Error in abaqus when use sanisand
Hi everyone When I use sanisand model in abaqus , This error is seen Can anyone help? Other subroutines work well for me Is it possible for my input parameters […] -
Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
Dear all, Recently, I have been working on the simulation of a pile-soil interaction with CEL method in Abaqus/Explicit. I simulate the sand with the Sand Hypoplasticity Model provided by […] -
New book “Modelling of Soil Behaviour of Hypoplasticity”
I have just returned to Springer proofs of my new book “Modelling of Soil Behaviour of Hypoplasticity – Another Approach to Soil Constitutive Modelling“. It will probably still take few […] -
hypoplastic interface
I want to consider particle crushing in the hypoplastic interface model. Also, when I use the CEL method to simulate, how can I use the hypoplastic interface model? Should I […] -
ALERT doctoral school on constitutive modelling – hands on session triax input files
ALERT doctoral school on constitutive modelling is happening right now. The school lecture notes are available at the website of ALERT geomaterials (http://alertgeomaterials.eu/publications/) Below you find triax input files for […] -
Interpreting results of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus VUMAT
Dear concern, Recently i have modelled the soil pile interaction using Abaqus CEL method. The hypoplastic behavior of the soil is model using user subroutine VUMAT. The properties of the […] -
Who is Online
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
use static general for umat
or use Dynamic implicit