Soft soil and soft soil creep model both include time while performing the analysis. What is the difference between both of them.
Tags: Constitutive relations plaxisRelated Articles
-
Calibration the UMAT sand hypoplastic parameters
Dear all, I’m facing trouble in calculating NO. 16 parameter in the UMAT for sand hypoplasticity by Dr. Masin, any help will be really appreciated especially with an example. Best […] -
need help in Flac3d6
dear user hello i intend to build a numerical model using flac3d 6 software i build the geometry with extrusion pane and set all values for pile – soil interaction […] -
FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity interface
Dear Prof Stutz and Prof Mašín, Is FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity available? If yes, could you please provide me with the link to download FRIC? Thank you Haran -
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap
I’m looking for a VUMAT subroutine for Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap models in Abaqus/Explicit. If anyone has a working implementation that they’re willing to share, I’d greatly appreciate it! […] -
hypoplasticity umat filr
hello every one i have a problem with abaqus subroutine can i use hypoplastic umat file that prepared for palxis in this website in abaqus? or the files must be […] -
-
Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soil-monopile interaction
Dear all, I am trying to model soil-monopile interaction (3D) in ABAQUS/Standard in order to perform subsequently a cyclic and dynamic analysis. For the soil I am using the SANISAND […] -
The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws
I am happy to announce that our pre-print paper, “The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws: a tutorial and a user manual”, is available on researchgate […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
-
Suggestions for an Advanced Constitutive Model in FEM-Based Dynamic Slope Stability Analysis 12.2.2025
-
Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus 2.1.2025
-
hypoplastic interface 11.12.2024
-
Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND 30.10.2024
Hi
If you refer to the PLAXIS Soft Soil and Soil Soil Creep model, the main difference is that there is a creep law included in the Soft Soil Creep model, but not in the Soft Soil model.
As both are defined in effective stress space with effective strength, you can perform consolidation analysis with both.
For some practical use of the creep effect and the influence of the OCR, please see
https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/w/plaxis-soilvision-wiki/46054/practical-application-of-the-soft-soil-creep-model