Soft soil and soft soil creep model both include time while performing the analysis. What is the difference between both of them.
Tags: Constitutive relations plaxisSoft soil model vs Soft soil creep model
Related Articles
-
VUMAT ABAQUS: sandy soil
hoang thai an||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 1,349
Dear PhD, I am studying roller vibrations on sandy soil models with vumat. Can PhD give me the subroutine model and input parameters of objects for reference? Unit of the […] -
Hypoplastic Interface Model: Does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D
ruohan sun||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 923
I want to use this model to simulate soil-structure interaction in FLAC3D software, so I was wondering does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D, and could you please share your […] -
Hypoplastic Interface Model: Virtual Shear Zone Thickness and Surface Rougness Coefficient
Tunç Gökdemir||Constitutive Modelling|9 |
Views 1,159
Hello, I want to use Hypoplastic Interface (Fric Subroutine) in my ABAQUS contact models. However, I don’t know how I can determine Virtual Shear Zone Thickness. It is the Parameter […] -
Intergranular strain concept modification
Piotr Kowalczyk||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 946
Hi all Just a short question on the modification of the intergranular strain concept proposed by Wegener & Herle (2014) to limit strain accumulation. In terms of the numerical implementation […] -
need help in Flac3d6
Ahmed Mahir||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 999
dear user hello i intend to build a numerical model using flac3d 6 software i build the geometry with extrusion pane and set all values for pile – soil interaction […] -
Oedometer test simulation with “Sand Hypoplasticity Model” in Plaxis
Manuel Winkler||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 1,294
Hi, I just came across some problems with the implementation of the “Sand Hypoplasticity Model” in Plaxis. I wanted to to perform a simulation of an oedometer test on a […] -
Hypoplastic Model for Clays (Masin): Ag, ng or Gvh, n
Fernando Sarabia||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 1,910
Dr. Masin I have downloaded the most recent dll for Plaxis that includes the HypoPlastic model for Clays that you developed. I see two new parameters (Gvh0 and n), both […] -
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Marco Hofer||Constitutive Modelling|3 |
Views 1,059
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Shear modulus degragation 12.5.2022
-
FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity interface 23.4.2022
-
Hypo-umat sand 18.4.2022
-
Hypo-umat sand 18.4.2022
-
Using pore fluid-stress element in SandSand 9.4.2022
-
“Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT 8.4.2022
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2022 with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Cino Viggiani 7.4.2022
-
Micropiles load tests database 26.3.2022
-
DIANA 10.5 new features 10.3.2022
-
Input files for element tests for hypoplastic clay/sand UMAT 6.3.2022
-
Combining Hypoplastic-sand and Hypoplastic-clay in one UMAT file 2.3.2022
-
UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes 19.2.2022
Recent Comments
- Tao Zhu on Implimentation of SANISAND constitutive model in ABAQUS/Standard for a soil-monopile interaction
- Alireza Lajmiri on Download package of ISA cyclic hypoplasticity for Abaqus
- Baban Bapir on Shear modulus degragation
- Rakshanda Showkat on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- HaoRan OUYANG on Using pore fluid-stress element in SandSand
- HaoRan OUYANG on Course “Hypoplasticity for Practical Applications”
- Miracle Dai on Hypo-umat sand
- Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
- Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
- Kassem Dib on liquefaction simulation with abaqus
- Kassem Dib on Transient Dynamic analysis (U-P formulation)
- Yifei Sun on matlab driver
- SPARSHA SINDURI NAGULA on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Srinivas Vivek Bokkisa on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
- MOHD SAQIB on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
- Srinivas Vivek Bokkisa on Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
- Jesus Mediavilla on DIANA FEA 10.3 new release – special on geotechnics
- Keng-Wit Lim on UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes
Hi
If you refer to the PLAXIS Soft Soil and Soil Soil Creep model, the main difference is that there is a creep law included in the Soft Soil Creep model, but not in the Soft Soil model.
As both are defined in effective stress space with effective strength, you can perform consolidation analysis with both.
For some practical use of the creep effect and the influence of the OCR, please see
https://communities.bentley.com/products/geotech-analysis/w/plaxis-soilvision-wiki/46054/practical-application-of-the-soft-soil-creep-model