Hi everyone, i have combined both Hypoplastic sand and clay umats in one umat ( to use for example in the case of multilayered soil medium made of clay and sand layers). My question is the following : is there any known issue when doing so ?
Sincerely,
Related Articles
-
Question on the Matlab driver – model hypo Cam Clay
As a beginner to soil constitutive modelling, I am learning the hypoplastic models by reading the matlab drivers. I am confused with the matlab file f_hyp.m in the model hypo_camclay. […] -
Undrained Tests with Clay Hypoplasticity Intergranular
Hi all, I wanted to share these results to show that the use of the hypo clay model does in fact give more realistic undrained stress paths for clays on […] -
Automatic calibration software ExCalibre has been launched
On behalf of the team of developers I am happy to announce that, after more than four years of development and testing, ExCalibre has just been launched. ExCalibre is a […] -
-
Problems with the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model
Where can I find the source of the content in the picture below in the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model? -
SANICLAY-B (2018) how to calculate Dep
Dear fellows, I have been working on coding SANICLAY-B model (2018) . Now I have one question in terms of this model. But I am stuck now. I have two […] -
Hypoplastic UMAT & Void Ratio
Hi all, Can anyone give a clarification on the material property (parameter 22) in the hypopplasticity umat for clay on Abaqus. My understanding is that these parameters are defined as […] -
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Quality Whole Frozen Chicken & Parts for International Wholesale Buyers 4.9.2026
-
Animating Soil Mechanics 3.7.2026
-
GeoXPM 19.6.2026
-
Autumn School in Soil Modelling at NTNU 16.6.2026
-
Viscohypoplastic bentonite (VIBE) model 28.5.2026
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
Hello, Anis! I wonder if you have complete the combined umat and whether the model can run?
I dont know how to make different layers to obtain the unique material property in only one umat, how did you do that?
Sincerely,