I have a question regarding the simulation of cone penetration tests using the SANISAND04 model. I have observed that the parameter m (yield surface size)has a significant impact on the penetration force, even m ranges from 0.01 to 0.03. The FEM simulation shows that the penetration force increases with decrease of m. What is the cause of this issue?
Tags: Finite element codeProblem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
Related Articles
-
A problem of convergence from using Hypoplastic model in Abaqus
Joe Chu||Finite Elements|5 |Views 4,032
Dear all, The sand hypoplastic model has been used to simulate the interaction between soil and pile. However, there is a bad convergence in the process of calculation. When I […] -
Plaxis 3D Tunnel
Mesut Demir||Finite Elements|0 |Views 3,922
Hi Everybody, I would like to ask an error problem where I am getting while using Plaxis 3D tunnel V 1.2. Previously I was using the software with Windows 7 […] -
Modeling of granular soil by using UMAT hypoplastic in Abaqus
Naif Alsanabani||Finite Elements|5 |Views 4,309
Dear all I am using the UMAT of hypoplastic model for simulation soil (3D modeling) under cyclic loading. The analysis was completed at geostatic step. But for consolidation step (soil, […] -
Tochnog Professional becomes free
Dennis Roddeman||Finite Elements|0 |Views 3,823
After several decades of development we are happy to announce that the Tochnog Professional finite element program has become free. Both for academic and commercial use. We are extremely grateful […] -
Slope stability calculation with hypoplasticity using phi-c reduction available now in download section
David Mašín||Finite Elements|0 |Views 4,077
The strength reduction method in clay hypoplasticity now available -
Presentations on hypoplasticity applications, D. Mašín, NGI 2017
David Mašín||Finite Elements|0 |Views 5,532
Based on some requests, I share here two presentations on hypoplasticity applications. One is related to simulation of various boundary value problems, the other focuses on simulation of cyclic and […] -
Few more Question on calculating lateral displacement of pile using hypoplastic clay model
Muhammad Ahmad||Finite Elements|0 |Views 4,128
Dear Professor David, Thank you very much for your previous clarification. its really helps. In continuation to my previous , there are few more question, i want your kindself to […] -
Hypoplastic model for thermal cycles (Abaqus)
Chiara Iodice||Finite Elements|2 |Views 3,914
Dear all, I’m using the UMAT file in which the hypoplastic model for thermal cycles is implemented. In the Abaqus input file I have added the two lines necessary to […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
- Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus 2.1.2025
- hypoplastic interface 11.12.2024
- Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND 30.10.2024
- REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING 23.10.2024
- Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic 11.10.2024
- Connecting remote sensors to the Plaxis FEM 3D using python 26.7.2024
- Intergranular Strain Extensions 16.7.2024
- Abaqus Hypoplasticity Primary Variable Is Not Available 1.7.2024
- Vumat to calculate excess pore in Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian ABAQUS 1.7.2024
- Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model 20.6.2024
- Soil model for sand under drained cyclic loading 15.6.2024
- In Abaqus how do we use *DLOAD for defining both user-defined pressure and body force simultaneously? 15.6.2024
Recent Comments
- Xiuzhe Wang on Hypoplasticity sand convergence issues
- Zheng Wanying on Example of FLAC3D data file
- Zheng Wanying on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Anis Kheffache on Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus.
- Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- Kiruthika Perumal on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- Shishir Kumar Sikder Amit on Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
- Zhentao Liu on Hypoplasticity sand convergence issues
- Zhentao Liu on Combining Hypoplastic-sand and Hypoplastic-clay in one UMAT file
- Sumin Song on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMAT-Plaxis interface
- KHA DIDJA on Issue in applying SANISAND04 UMAT to Boundary-Value-Problem
- Zhentao Liu on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
- Jin-Hu Li on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
- Johan Clausen on Triaxial compression test using Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus
- Ismail Khan on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Tao Zhu on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Lei DAI on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Yu Xiao on “Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT
is it a drained or undrained simulation?
Thanks for your reply. It is drained simulation.
I’m not very familiar with the SANISAND model, but I would expect the forces to increase as the initial yield surfaces gets larger, since my elastic space also becomes larger. Maybe it’s somehow oversimplied my analysis. Does a decreasing m parameter lead to a smaller yield surface?
Thank you. The yield surface becomes smaller with decreasing m. The simulation result is very strange.
Hello. Any update on the results or potential cause for this behavior?
Hi, dear zhanng
did you complete the simulation in ABAQUS or in PLAXIS?
Hi,Dr Liu,
Have you solved it? Can I communicate with you on wechat?
No I havent solve this problem,
I can connect with you in Wechat
but how to find you on that?