Greetings
i used interface Vumat with Umat for simulating CEL problem, after 50% of analysis, i got the error as “Excessive incremental rotation of the elements in element set ” i researched the meaning about this error in literature but h couldn’t find how fix it. Anybody can help me and advise.
Regards
Related Articles
-
UMAT in Geotechnics
Hi Everyone! I am a research Intern at Laval University, my project is about the effect of soil structure interaction on the seismic design of Geostructures. Exactly we want to […] -
Modified Cam clay model now supported in automatic calibration software ExCalibre
Free SoilModels automatic calibration software ExCalibre, available at, https://soilmodels.com/excalibre/, now supports Modified Cam clay model. This is both for laboratory test simulation as well as for automatic calibration. We hope […] -
Question on the Matlab driver – model hypo Cam Clay
As a beginner to soil constitutive modelling, I am learning the hypoplastic models by reading the matlab drivers. I am confused with the matlab file f_hyp.m in the model hypo_camclay. […] -
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […] -
Clay Hypoplastic Model ABAQUS UMAT
Hi, I wanted to ask if the variables/parameters defined in the online Hypoplastic model manual for PLAXIS (https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node6.html) are the same for the ABAQUS UMAT? -
Spurious oscillations in calculated accelerations
Hello everyone, I have just a general question how people approach the problem of spurious oscillations generated in dynamic analysis when using nonlinear soil constitutive models. I understand sometimes numerical […] -
Error: permission to access files denied (Hypoplasticity in PLAXIS)
Hello, I am trying to implement the dll for hypoplasticity in Plaxis 3D. It runs through both the Initial Phase and a Nil Step. However, when it calculates about 20 […] -
Automatic calibration software ExCalibre has been launched
On behalf of the team of developers I am happy to announce that, after more than four years of development and testing, ExCalibre has just been launched. ExCalibre is a […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Hypoplasticity & Recent Stress History 20.1.2020
-
hypoplasticity models in free Tochnog Professional 14.1.2020
-
Problems with the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model 11.1.2020
-
Tochnog Professional overview movie in youtube 29.12.2019
-
Tochnog Professional becomes free 18.12.2019
Hello Elfattah,
most probably your time step is too large. You can arbitrary decrease it with the “time scale factor” (maybe other name) in the “Step” module.
I recommend you should familiarize yourself with the theory of the CEL method. This might help you to solve the problem related to these error messages related to the CEL method in ABAQUS.
Best regards
Johannes
Dear Labenski
thank you for response, CEL depend on fixing the the mesh in space, so the distortion shall not be developed. i tried to reduce the time and mesh size, but the error is displayed after about 25 % instead of 50 % of analysis. Noted I used interface Vumat/Umat by Britta Bienen
Actually the mesh is not fixed as you might expect. The CEL method consists of three steps. In one step, the “fixed” mesh will be deformed according to the load and the corresponding material response. In a latter phase the deformed mesh will be resetted to its initial position, i.e. as user you think the mesh is fixed in space.
So reducing the time step with the time scaling factor (see image: https://imgur.com/a/kEHLYRy) usually worked for me to resolve this problem with CEL simulations. By standard I use a time scale factor of 0.9, but sometimes you may need even smaller factors. Of course, the computational time is increasing if you decrease this factor.
I see, i have already tried to use time scale factor to 0.5 and 0.85, but the error is displayed after about 25 % instead of 50 % of analysis. in addition, i tried too reduce the mesh size but i still receive the error. this error appear when i use Vumat. in contrast, the analysis has complete using anther constitutive law such as Mohr Coulomb or cap plasticity with the same model.
Did you receive this error before for CEL model ? and do you think that there problem in Vumat/Umat interface ?
I am using the Vumat-Umat interface for vibratory-pile installation simulations without problems. In most cases I could resolve this error with the time scale factor. You should also check if your boundary conditions are defined correct. You should only define boundary conditions you really need. Do not constrain all DOF at all boundaries, if you don’t need to.
the error element is existing at symmetry face near the contact zone
in addition, the energy balance is not normal. because the dramatically decreasing of total energy is occurred and the internal energy is very low. Noted, there is message state the the stretch element instead of gradient deformation
Hello
subscribe to and seek assistance from the
ABAQUS mailing list
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Abaqus/info
Search the archive of the list before posting in it.
The list does not accept attachments.
Or
http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=799
or from the ResearchGate discussion forum.
For advice on mechanics in general, including modeling,
you can consult
http://imechanica.org/
If you need subroutines: as an introduction get the file
http://imechanica.org/files/Writing User Subroutines with ABAQUS.pdf
Good luck
Frank