Greetings
i used interface Vumat with Umat for simulating CEL problem, after 50% of analysis, i got the error as “Excessive incremental rotation of the elements in element set ” i researched the meaning about this error in literature but h couldn’t find how fix it. Anybody can help me and advise.
Regards
CEL analysis using hypo plasticity Vumat
Related Articles
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface
Naren Gurung||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 1,275
Hi, I have a very basic question. I wanted to compare 2D vs 3D Mohr Coulomb yield surface. I believe the 2D yield surface is part of 3D yield surface. […] -
-
Combining Hypoplastic-sand and Hypoplastic-clay in one UMAT file
anis kheffache||Constitutive Modelling|1 |Views 5,021
Hi everyone, i have combined both Hypoplastic sand and clay umats in one umat ( to use for example in the case of multilayered soil medium made of clay and […] -
The Mises stress calculated by the hypoplasticity model considering the intergranular strain is all 0
Xi Huan||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 1,391
Hi all, Recently I am simulating unit tests in tight sand under pressure using a subplastic model, the sand is Fontainebleau sand and the subplastic model is from David Mašín.This […] -
Triaxial Callibration test with Hypoplasticity
pooyan ghasemi||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,808
Dear all I am trying to calibrate the HP for sand, and I have quite comprehensive data. but they are not totally consistent with each other . we have the […] -
matlab driver
anis kheffache||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,818
Hi everyone. When i try to run the matlab driver I get the following error, how can i sove it ? (The constructor for class ‘update’ must return only one […] -
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap
Chris Eskandari||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 4,135
I’m looking for a VUMAT subroutine for Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap models in Abaqus/Explicit. If anyone has a working implementation that they’re willing to share, I’d greatly appreciate it! […] -
Papers on Excalibre
David Mašín||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 5,308
Hi all, Details of Excalibre software (https://soilmodels.com/excalibre) functionality and calibration procedure have been published in two papers, which are now available online at the webpages of publisher (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11440-021-01441-0 and https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11440-021-01435-y). […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
Recent Comments
- Ding Yan on Download package of a complete dataset “Karlsruhe Kaolin – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)”
- Arie Koot on mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface
- Arie Koot on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Amir F on Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software
- Nabanita Saha on set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat
- Nabanita Saha on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Tian Fapai on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Heng Wang on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Zhang Hongwei on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Ruimin Chen on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Nitesh Bhume on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Aleksandar Kostadinovic on Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
- Amrane Moussa on Kadlíček, T., Ochmański, M., Mašín, D. and Duque, J. (2022) Report on Charles University implementation of high cycle accumulation model
- Ramon Varghese on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Shuhan Cao on Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
- Kuikui Guigui on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
- Kuikui Guigui on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Francisco José Mendez on Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic






Hello Elfattah,
most probably your time step is too large. You can arbitrary decrease it with the “time scale factor” (maybe other name) in the “Step” module.
I recommend you should familiarize yourself with the theory of the CEL method. This might help you to solve the problem related to these error messages related to the CEL method in ABAQUS.
Best regards
Johannes
Dear Labenski
thank you for response, CEL depend on fixing the the mesh in space, so the distortion shall not be developed. i tried to reduce the time and mesh size, but the error is displayed after about 25 % instead of 50 % of analysis. Noted I used interface Vumat/Umat by Britta Bienen
Actually the mesh is not fixed as you might expect. The CEL method consists of three steps. In one step, the “fixed” mesh will be deformed according to the load and the corresponding material response. In a latter phase the deformed mesh will be resetted to its initial position, i.e. as user you think the mesh is fixed in space.
So reducing the time step with the time scaling factor (see image: https://imgur.com/a/kEHLYRy) usually worked for me to resolve this problem with CEL simulations. By standard I use a time scale factor of 0.9, but sometimes you may need even smaller factors. Of course, the computational time is increasing if you decrease this factor.
I see, i have already tried to use time scale factor to 0.5 and 0.85, but the error is displayed after about 25 % instead of 50 % of analysis. in addition, i tried too reduce the mesh size but i still receive the error. this error appear when i use Vumat. in contrast, the analysis has complete using anther constitutive law such as Mohr Coulomb or cap plasticity with the same model.
Did you receive this error before for CEL model ? and do you think that there problem in Vumat/Umat interface ?
I am using the Vumat-Umat interface for vibratory-pile installation simulations without problems. In most cases I could resolve this error with the time scale factor. You should also check if your boundary conditions are defined correct. You should only define boundary conditions you really need. Do not constrain all DOF at all boundaries, if you don’t need to.
the error element is existing at symmetry face near the contact zone
in addition, the energy balance is not normal. because the dramatically decreasing of total energy is occurred and the internal energy is very low. Noted, there is message state the the stretch element instead of gradient deformation
Hello
subscribe to and seek assistance from the
ABAQUS mailing list
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Abaqus/info
Search the archive of the list before posting in it.
The list does not accept attachments.
Or
http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=799
or from the ResearchGate discussion forum.
For advice on mechanics in general, including modeling,
you can consult
http://imechanica.org/
If you need subroutines: as an introduction get the file
http://imechanica.org/files/Writing User Subroutines with ABAQUS.pdf
Good luck
Frank