Hello all,
According to my last post some weeks ago I now have translated the laboratory data from engineering strain to true strain with the following formula: epsilon(true)=ln(1+epsilon(engineering)). I compared then the the new values of the measurement data with the points on the graph of the ExCalibre output. And they a still different. For the Oedometer the measurement point (sigma 1/epsilon 1 true) is (1200/0,101) and on the graph of ExCalibre it is (1200/0,112). The same is for the triaxial tests. The maximum true strain epsilon 1 of the measurement is 0,197 and on the graph it goes until 0,244. Attached are the pictures of the ExCalibre output with the points and a picture of the excel table with the measurement values.
Is the transformation of strain different in ExCalibre or what can be the reason for that?
Regards Marco
ExCalibre Automatic Calibration
Related Articles
-
-
Cyclic Behavior of Sand
MOHD SAQIB||Constitutive Modelling|3 |
Views 4,377
Hello, Is there any constitutive model for sand which can simulate the number of cycles to reach the critical state. I used the SANISAND model but it is not promising. […] -
UMAT for strain-rate effects
Luis Zambrano-Cruzatty||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 4,392
Dear community, I’m interested in constitutive models that can handle strain-rate effects for HSR on sands for simulating free fall penetration. I would appreciate any help. Do you know any […] -
Question on the Matlab driver-hypoplastic models
c sx||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 4,428
Dear all, After carefully reading the matlab drivers of hypoplastic models, I was wondering whether the driver can simulate triaxial extension tests. As I change the constraints to reflect triaxial […] -
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic
jay chou||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 1,390
Hello everyone, I am using the ‘remeshing and interpolation technique with small strain’ (RITSS) method with hypoplastic, but I cannot continue the calculation after mapping. There is a warning in […] -
SSE and SPD Mohr Coulomb Crieria
Matías Sáez de Tejada||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 4,975
I have a UMAT of Mohr Coulomb with no hardening, where i have to define SSE (specific strain energy) and SPD (specific plastic dissipation). Any idea? -
Non-local regularization: Need VUMAT of Mohr-Coulomb model in abaqus
Kunal Sanjay Pardikar||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 5,419
Dear Community, I want to include a non-local regularization technique in the built-in Mohr-Coulomb model of abaqus to capture the strain-localization effects. I am trying to find the original VUMAT […] -
Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
Kunpeng Wang||Constitutive Modelling|12 |
Views 7,555
Dear all, Recently, I have been working on the simulation of a pile-soil interaction with CEL method in Abaqus/Explicit. I simulate the sand with the Sand Hypoplasticity Model provided by […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
-
Suggestions for an Advanced Constitutive Model in FEM-Based Dynamic Slope Stability Analysis 12.2.2025
-
Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus 2.1.2025
-
hypoplastic interface 11.12.2024
-
Triaxial Test Driver SANISAND 30.10.2024
-
REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING 23.10.2024
-
Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic 11.10.2024
-
Connecting remote sensors to the Plaxis FEM 3D using python 26.7.2024
Recent Comments
- Shuhan Cao on Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
- Kuikui Guigui on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
- Kuikui Guigui on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Francisco José Mendez on Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic
- Francisco José Mendez on REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING
- Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen on GroundVib.setup.web.exe
- Maria Manakou on GroundVib.setup.web.exe
- Jay Chou on Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic
- Tongyu Di on Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic
- Dingxin Zhang on Errors of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus Vumat
- Linares De Castro on GroundVib.setup.web.exe
- Chris Eskandari on Drucker Prager Cap Hardening Model
- Hu Shihong on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Ulas Cilingir on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Pouya Zahedi on UMAT Code for Modified Cam Clay model
- Xiuzhe Wang on Hypoplasticity sand convergence issues
- Zheng Wanying on Example of FLAC3D data file
- Zheng Wanying on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
Hi Marco, my colleague Tomáš Kadlíček checked ExCalibre code, he will send you more details in a separate comment. Regards David
Hi David, thanks for the quick response.
Regards Marco
Hi Marco, I have checked the source code of ExCalibre and it is correct. In the case of compression, you should calculate strains as follows:
epsilon(engineering) = dL/L0
epsilon(true)= – ln( 1 – epsilon(engineering))
In this way, TRUE strains will be larger then ENGINEERING strains. True strains are related to the current hight of the specimen whereas ENG strains are related to the initial hight “L0”.
Therefore, when subjected to the same amount of settlement “dL” you should always obtain larger strain increment in the case of TRUE strains in comparison to the ENG strains.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Kind Regards,
Tomas Kadlicek
Hi Thomas,
now everything fit together. Thanks a lot.
Regards
Marco