Hello all,
According to my last post some weeks ago I now have translated the laboratory data from engineering strain to true strain with the following formula: epsilon(true)=ln(1+epsilon(engineering)). I compared then the the new values of the measurement data with the points on the graph of the ExCalibre output. And they a still different. For the Oedometer the measurement point (sigma 1/epsilon 1 true) is (1200/0,101) and on the graph of ExCalibre it is (1200/0,112). The same is for the triaxial tests. The maximum true strain epsilon 1 of the measurement is 0,197 and on the graph it goes until 0,244. Attached are the pictures of the ExCalibre output with the points and a picture of the excel table with the measurement values.
Is the transformation of strain different in ExCalibre or what can be the reason for that?
Regards Marco
ExCalibre Automatic Calibration
Related Articles
-
Compatibility of subroutines in ABQ2021
Erick Kencana||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 2,732
Hi Admin, I have been using hypoplastic subroutine supplied by this website. It works well in ABQ6.14 and ABQ2017. However, recently I have to upgrade to ABQ2021 due to an […] -
New features in Excalibre
David Mašín||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 3,099
Hi all, We are happy to announce that the Excalibre team received support from the research grant GACR 22-12178S to further develop the calibration software, which is freely available at […] -
Cyclic simple shear test simulation with hypoplasticity
Piotr Kowalczyk||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 2,852
Dear All, I am using sand hypoplastic model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic simple shear test in the range of small strains. […] -
Compile triax calibration software under windows
Hans Henning Stutz||Constitutive Modelling|1 |
Views 2,575
1. Download install exe (32 or 64 bit) from https://cygwin.com/install.html 2. Choose a mirror site / click Next and select all packages you need for compiling: Type: “gcc” into search […] -
Looking for help
Axel Grauwinkel||Constitutive Modelling|4 |
Views 235
Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite […] -
Modelling Rate-dependent behaviour of clay [Urgent]
Balaji Bandaru||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 2,230
Using PLAXIS, how to model rate dependent behavior of clay. This is to show the viscous behavior of the soil. Thank you in advance -
Hypoplastic rate independent and non-linearity
sobhan abedinnejad||Constitutive Modelling|2 |
Views 2,248
Dear all I’m studying hypo-plastic constitutive law from beginning concepts I traced concepts successfully until i faced **rate independent topic** i read this topic in the prof. Wolfgangs paper (hypo-plasticity […] -
Animating Soil Models – eLearning Project
Gertraud Medicus||Constitutive Modelling|0 |
Views 3,327
Dear all, I am currently writing a proposal for a (small & hopefully nice) eLearning project: Within the project, I would like to create animations related to constitutive modelling. I […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
-
New features in Excalibre 17.1.2023
-
Sanisand 13.1.2023
-
SaniSand Model in Plaxis 3D 9.12.2022
-
The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws 2.12.2022
-
Abaqus OneAPI Compiler 10.11.2022
-
Few more Question on calculating lateral displacement of pile using hypoplastic clay model 3.10.2022
-
A question about the hypoplastic model in clay 22.9.2022
-
A High-Cycle Accumulation Model for Sand (Niemunis et al., 2005) 6.9.2022
-
Malaysian kaolin – Cyclic tests by Charles University 5.9.2022
-
Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model 2.9.2022
-
GTS NX 25.7.2022
Recent Comments
- Shruthija Sreeram on UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines)
- Paul Le Roux on Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University
- Amrane Moussa on Download package of a complete dataset “Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University”
- Francisco Mendez on The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws
- Abolfazl Najafi on The GA-cal software for the automatic calibration of soil constitutive laws
- Arie Koot on SaniSand Model in Plaxis 3D
- Sajjad Shakeri on UDSM PLAXIS
- Anis Kheffache on Abaqus OneAPI Compiler
- Kassem Dib on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
- Dimitrios Konstantinidis on Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
- Tomáš Kadlíček on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Safia EDAOUDI on Simulating Oedometer test in PLAXIS
- Safia EDAOUDI on Simulating the oedometric test with Abaqus
- MOHD SAQIB on Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
- Dimitrios Konstantinidis on Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine.
- Guilherme Castro on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Giada Orlando on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Paul Le Roux on PM4Sand and PM4Silt models available
Hi Marco, my colleague Tomáš Kadlíček checked ExCalibre code, he will send you more details in a separate comment. Regards David
Hi David, thanks for the quick response.
Regards Marco
Hi Marco, I have checked the source code of ExCalibre and it is correct. In the case of compression, you should calculate strains as follows:
epsilon(engineering) = dL/L0
epsilon(true)= – ln( 1 – epsilon(engineering))
In this way, TRUE strains will be larger then ENGINEERING strains. True strains are related to the current hight of the specimen whereas ENG strains are related to the initial hight “L0”.
Therefore, when subjected to the same amount of settlement “dL” you should always obtain larger strain increment in the case of TRUE strains in comparison to the ENG strains.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Kind Regards,
Tomas Kadlicek
Hi Thomas,
now everything fit together. Thanks a lot.
Regards
Marco