Not able to run the subroutine ……..error is coming ……UMAT: illegal (negative) actual void ratio detected
Can anybody help
Hypoplastcity sand model
Related Articles
-
Difference between ExCalibre and Plaxis for Oedometer test
Marco Hofer||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,223
Hello all, i did the automatic calibration for the Dobrany and Motol sand and tried to model the soil tests also in Plaxis and then to compare both. For the […] -
-
SImulation with hypoplastic model for granular materials in ABAQUS
yusheng yang||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,421
Hello, I want to use the hypoplastic model for granular materials downloaded from https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxis-umat-hypoplas-zip. The UMAT file umat.for is the model for sand. I followed the instruction https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html. I have […] -
Problems with the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model
meng xiaowei||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,382
Where can I find the source of the content in the picture below in the UMAT subroutine check_parms_DM of the SANISAND constitutive model? -
ERROR Message when using UMAT_hcea with ABAQUS
Lukas Reindl||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,545
Hi all! I am modelling some triaxial compressions in ABAQUS with Weald Clay. The constitutive law i am using is the clay hypoplasticity by Mašín. When running the program using […] -
SANISAND pile-soil-interaction ABAQUS
Lee Jae Sung||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,224
Hi everyone: I am trying to use SANISAND as the constitutive model of soil, and use ABAQUS software to simulate pile-soil interaction. Is it better to choose “Static, Genaral” analysis […] -
Spurious oscillations in calculated accelerations
Piotr Kowalczyk||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 4,164
Hello everyone, I have just a general question how people approach the problem of spurious oscillations generated in dynamic analysis when using nonlinear soil constitutive models. I understand sometimes numerical […] -
multi yield surface model
kamal paknejad||Constitutive Modelling|6 |Views 4,704
Hi everyone, i am trying to write umat subroutine for multi yield surface plasticity model.if its possible give me some information to do my project better and if some body […]
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
- Degradation ( disturbance ) of hypoplastic clay 23.4.2024
- Degradation ( disturbance ) of hypoplastic clay 23.4.2024
- Paper of Coulomb, C. A. (1773) 15.4.2024
- ABAQUS UMAT of hypoplastic clay model 6.4.2024
- Prague Geotechnical Days 2024 “Geotechnical monitoring” and 30th jubilee Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Eduardo Alonso 5.4.2024
- UMAT for Creep-SCLAY model. 1.3.2024
- Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver 14.2.2024
- SUMMER SCHOOL ‘Numerical Modelling in Geotechnical Engineering’, Innsbruck – July 22nd-26th, 2024 1.2.2024
- COURSE IN SOIL MODELING – NTNU, Trondheim – October 14th to 18th, 2024 21.12.2023
- MSE walls design in Plaxis 11.12.2023
- sand liquefaction modelling in Anura3D 8.12.2023
- BCV bentonite experimental and modelling datasets 14.11.2023
Recent Comments
- Jh Xue on UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines)
- Santosh Katuwal on PM4Sand for Plaxis Download
- KHA DIDJA on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Debdip Das on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Ramon Varghese on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Akhtyar Gul Shirzoi on ABAQUS UMAT of hypoplastic clay model
- KHA DIDJA on Animating Soil Models
- Jh Xue on Undrained Tests with Clay Hypoplasticity Intergranular
- Zhentao Liu on Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04
- Gertraud Medicus on ABAQUS UMAT of hypoplastic clay model
- Chen Zhiming on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Konstantinos Chatzis on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Abhay Pratap Singh on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Giovanni Ciardi on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Konstantinos Chatzis on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Ismail Khan on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Kanika Lamba on Cyclic tests with Triax element test driver
- Arie Koot on How to model the settlement in soil due to water drawdown.
Hi, so I guess you provided illegal (negative) actual void ratio 🙂
Hypoplasticity is porosity-dependent model and proper initialisation of state variables is needed, either through sdvini, or through the initialisation implemented directly in umat routine (this is not available in all umats, depends on what umat you use). For example, in sand hypoplasticity umat
https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxis-umat-hypoplas-tar-gz/
you can initialise void ratio using parameter 16, so sdvini routine is not needed, see
https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html
I used the model parameters from the Ex-calibre database for sand hypoplasticity (dobrany) and initial (actual) void ratio as the one before oedometric test (0.996). And I’m getting the error for negative actual void ratio. Am I doing something wrong or there could be other reasons for this error?
Hi Jasmine, to try to find out where is the problem, I suggest you to run umat in element test program first. You can also try different sand model umat (there are more options at SoilModels).
Thank you Professor for your prompt reply. I figured from the .dat file in ABAQUS that the void ratio value given in the sdvini subroutine has not been somehow considered in the analysis, because the value printed is null.
I could run the element tests (triaxial) using the subroutines. But, when I open the input file in ABAQUS and then try to run it, it gives error of void ratio.
Thanks got it……..I am using ABAQUS….Is any documentation is available for ABAQUS………I have checked for plaxis well documented manual is there…..Is it possible check pore water pressure and damping during earthquake (forABAQUS)………Currently I am using UMAT the one available in the link https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxis-umat-hypoplas-tar-gz/ (for abaqus i am using only umat file)
The description on parameters here:
https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html
is valid both for Plaxis and Abaqus.
If you want to run undrained analysis, then bulk modulus of water Kw is at parameter 15 and excess pore water pressure at statev 8. The same as in clay model (par7, statev8):
https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node6.html
Thank you very much……what is the unit of input and output state variable parameter……….can the model be used for liquefaction assessment …….. any limitation i am thinking of using it……….
in page no 6 of documentation it is written as state variable 8 is not used
Hi, yes, I know it is written, but I kept it for internal purposes, it is used. I will correct it in documentation later on. As for liquefaction, in principle you can use it, but this will be up to you, to calibrate the model using your data and assess predictive capabilities. As for state variables, there are either no units or kPa, but this will also be up to you to go through documentation… Hope the model helps, regards David
thank you very much