Dear Prof. Masin and Soil Model Community,
I am using HP clay subroutine in Plaxis 3D to simulate soil structure interaction problem. I want void ratio and OCR variation along the depth to back analyse centrifuge test. In Plaxis, either or OCR remains constant depending on input. Moreover, I found HP subroutine in plaxis calculate void ratio without considering kheppa line. Please see details and explanations in the attached images. My objective is to obtained initial void ratio and OCR variation along the model depth. Also, I want to confirm the position of e input in parameters in ln(1+e) – lnp space. Thanks
HP clay subroutine in Plaxis
Related Articles

Seismic Liquifaction
MOHD SAQIBFinite Elements2 Views 344
Hello All, I am trying to simulate the seismic liquefaction in Abaqus. Can you please help me to model this. Best Regards’ Saqib 
hypoplasticity model with Abaqus umat on Brno clay
mahdie masoudiFinite Elements4 Views 301
Dear all, I am a Ph.D. student at Kharazmi University. Recently I have been trying to simulate a triaxial compression test using the hypoplasticity model for clay using ABAQUS. The […] 
Small displacements when using HP model in Plaxis 3D
Arno CrousFinite Elements4 Views 104
I am modelling sand slopes in Plaxis 3D using an HP model. I am using soil parameters from “Modelling of Soil Behaviour with Hypoplasticity” by David Masin (2019). During the […] 
SANISAND umat issue
Philip AlkhouryFinite Elements1 Views 262
Hello everyone; I have implemented the Sanisand constitutive model (UMAT) in abaqus in the scope of performing a dynamic analysis on a 3D soilpile interaction problem. I have succeded in […] 
finite element modeling of ISAHP for sand material
arad ahmadi radinFinite Elements1 Views 258
On the simulation of the cyclic mobility effect with an ISA hypoplastic hypoplastic hypoplastic model, is it possible to simulate 3D liquefiable sandy soil by available umat file which is […] 
Factor of safety in Plaxis 3D using hypoplastic model for sand
Arno CrousFinite Elements1 Views 349
I am currently modelling a test conducted in the geotechnical centrifuge facility at HKUST. The test consisted of a sand slope with a rising water table. The slope height in […] 
How to model the settlement in soil due to water drawdown.
Guru PandaFinite Elements3 Views 717
Which software has the feature to model soil settlement due water drawdown? 
SANISAND dll
Emilio BilottaFinite Elements2 Views 490
Hi there, I’ve used successfully used SANISAND .dll with Plaxis 2016, but after switching to 2017 and now 2018 the .dll seems not to work (the parameter fields appear without […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 CESAR 11.5.2021
 UDSM PLAXIS 7.5.2021
 Interactive graphics of yield surfaces 30.4.2021
 Enhanced location search feature at SoilModels 30.4.2021
 How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below? 28.4.2021
 PHD Position on “Triggering and propagation of liquefaction in brittle geotechnical materials” at CIMNEUPC (Barcelona, Spain) 27.4.2021
 Guidance to newbie on how to calibrate a constitutive model 25.4.2021
 Oedometer tests on Ticino sand 8.4.2021
 PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D 30.3.2021
 Two postdoctoral positions in computational mechanics in Ben Gurion university and Ariel university, Israel, are available immediately 28.2.2021
 K0 determination Reloading using HP clay model 22.2.2021
 Seismic Liquifaction 11.2.2021
Recent Comments
 Shaohua Zeng on hypoplasticity model with Abaqus umat on Brno clay
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Gertraud Medicus on Interactive graphics of yield surfaces
 Mehdi Joneidi on Barodesy for clay including intergranular strain and strength reduction (UMAT and Plaxis DLL)
 Micha Van der Sloot on PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D
 Micha Van der Sloot on UDSM PLAXIS
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Chunxin Zhang on Hardening Soil Model in Abaqus
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Santiago Ijalba Pérez on Interactive graphics of yield surfaces
 Nasim Aftahi on PM4Silt now available in PLAXIS 2D
 Nasim Aftahi on Barodesy for clay including intergranular strain and strength reduction (UMAT and Plaxis DLL)
 Nasim Aftahi on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Sudipta Bhowmick on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Arie Koot on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
 Anis Kheffache on How can I solve the error in Abaqus mentioned below?
Dear Muhammad,
Actually, there are these two options only, initialise through constant void ratio or constant OCR. By the way, these only work with “K0 initilisation procedure”. With gravity loading procedure, void ratio will redictribute during gravity loading. If you need more complex distribution of void ratio with depth, you will have to approximate it through using many soil layers which will have the same parameters, just different initial void ratio.
Regards David
Dear Prof. Masin,
Thanks for your reply.
May I know how the model calculate undrained shear strength (cu)? Is it based on initial void ratio like critical state frame work or some other way? My concern is, if void ratio is constant along the model depth how can we obtained increasing cu along the depth with increasing effective stresses having constant void ratio?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Muhammad
Hi Muhammad,
Yes, HP model calculates cu based on the critical state soil mechanics framework. If you set constant void ratio with depth, you get constant undrained shear strength with depth. You can either initialise OCR, than cu will be distributed over depth based on that OCR. Or, you need to define layers with different void ratios.
David
Hi both,
Does this mean that the undrained shear strength can therefore be calculated for the hypoplastic model using the same formula for the MCC model:
Su=M/2 exp^(((Γ1e)/λ))
Cheers,
Hashmi
Just with a difference that in the oridnary Modified Cam clay normal compression lines are considered as linear in p vs 1+e plane, whereas hypoplastic model adopts Butterfield’s formulation with normal compression line linear in ln(1+e) vs ln p plane, so the equation needs to be updated accordingly. David