Dear Prof. Masin and Soil Model Community,
I am using HP clay subroutine in Plaxis 3D to simulate soil structure interaction problem. I want void ratio and OCR variation along the depth to back analyse centrifuge test. In Plaxis, either or OCR remains constant depending on input. Moreover, I found HP subroutine in plaxis calculate void ratio without considering kheppa line. Please see details and explanations in the attached images. My objective is to obtained initial void ratio and OCR variation along the model depth. Also, I want to confirm the position of e input in parameters in ln(1+e) – lnp space. Thanks
HP clay subroutine in Plaxis
Related Articles

Modeling of triaxial test sample by using hypoplastic subroutine
Naif AlsanabaniFinite Elements7 Views 514
I tried to model sample of triaxial test in Abaqus program. I used hypoplastic subroutine. The parameters used in hypoplastic model was Hochstetten sand the given in website “https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node5.html”. The […] 
Hypoplastic model for thermal cycles in clay (Abaqus)
Sherif GomaaFinite Elements2 Views 1,883
Dear all, I’m using the UMAT file in which the hypoplastic model for thermal cycles is implemented. I have done some runs for an axisymmetrical model for a single energy […] 
DIANA 10.4 released with full Geotechnical possibilities 3D as always, but now also 2D!
Ab van den bosFinite Elements0 Views 305
We are pleased to announce that DIANA 10.4 is released with full 2D geotechnical possibilities. DIANA is already easy to use for full 3D geotechnical models, and now the more […] 
Problem in GRPS embankment simulation In ABAQUS
Bidur PathakFinite Elements0 Views 230
Hi, I am doing Plane strain 2D simulation of GRPS embankment in ABAQUS, i encountered a problem that results of with geogrid and without geogrid both are showing same deflection. […] 
Modelling cyclic loads in Tochnog
Abdulaziz AbdelkadrFinite Elements0 Views 199
Dears all, I am using Tochnog professional software to model undrained cyclic triaxial test for behaviour and liquefaction studies. Is there an incremental driver model to execute for compressional cyclic […] 
A problem of convergence from using Hypoplastic model in Abaqus
Joe ChuFinite Elements5 Views 331
Dear all, The sand hypoplastic model has been used to simulate the interaction between soil and pile. However, there is a bad convergence in the process of calculation. When I […] 
Interface to study soilstructure interaction in Plaxis 3D (Clay Hypoplasticity)
Leon CortesFinite Elements6 Views 2,056
Hello, I am trying to simulate the behavior of helical anchors (also called screw anchors) using PLAXIS 3D and a clay hypoplasticity constitutive model. The helical anchor shaft is simulated […] 
Modeling cyclic undrained sandy soil triaxial test using ABAQUS
Shile DongFinite Elements3 Views 424
Dear all, I am trying to use Abaqus to modeling undrained cyclic triaxial test for liquefiable soil. I am wondering how could I applied the cyclic load. I should apply […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
 Convergence issue of unload of clay consolidation in Abaqus 10.7.2021
 Convergence issue of unload of clay consolidation in Abaqus 10.7.2021
 PLAXIS 2D Embedded Pile Row 2.7.2021
 PhD position at Unit fo Geotechnical Engineering of the University of Innsbruck in our doctoral program ‘Natural Hazards in Mountain Regions’ 17.6.2021
 Cyclic Triaxial Test 16.6.2021
 matlab driver 16.6.2021
 Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity 6.6.2021
 Hypoplastic sandmr parameter calibration 18.5.2021
 UMAT Code for Clay Hypoplasticity 18.5.2021
 CESAR 11.5.2021
 UDSM PLAXIS 7.5.2021
 Interactive graphics of yield surfaces 30.4.2021
Recent Comments
 Shen Wang on Convergence issue of unload of clay consolidation in Abaqus
 Ulas Cilingir on Incremental Driver
 Shen Wang on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMATPlaxis interface
 FATMA BELHADJ on Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
 Shaohua Zeng on Clay and Sand hypoplasticity UMAT and Plaxis implementations, including UMATPlaxis interface
 Mehdi Joneidi on Cyclic Triaxial Test
 Jose Duque on Cyclic Triaxial Test
 略轩 黄 on Clay hypoplasticity with strength reduction (umat and Plaxis dll).
 David Mašín on Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity
 Shen Wang on Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity
 Gertraud Medicus on Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity
 Gertraud Medicus on Boundary Conditions of Masin 2005 Paper for clay hypoplasticity
 Daniel Valencia on PM4Silt software
 Shen Wang on UMAT Code for Clay Hypoplasticity
 Manuel Bode on UMAT Code for Clay Hypoplasticity
 Shen Wang on UMAT Code for Clay Hypoplasticity
 Manuel Bode on UMAT Code for Clay Hypoplasticity
 Manuel Bode on Barodesy for clay including intergranular strain and strength reduction (UMAT and Plaxis DLL)
Dear Muhammad,
Actually, there are these two options only, initialise through constant void ratio or constant OCR. By the way, these only work with “K0 initilisation procedure”. With gravity loading procedure, void ratio will redictribute during gravity loading. If you need more complex distribution of void ratio with depth, you will have to approximate it through using many soil layers which will have the same parameters, just different initial void ratio.
Regards David
Dear Prof. Masin,
Thanks for your reply.
May I know how the model calculate undrained shear strength (cu)? Is it based on initial void ratio like critical state frame work or some other way? My concern is, if void ratio is constant along the model depth how can we obtained increasing cu along the depth with increasing effective stresses having constant void ratio?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Muhammad
Hi Muhammad,
Yes, HP model calculates cu based on the critical state soil mechanics framework. If you set constant void ratio with depth, you get constant undrained shear strength with depth. You can either initialise OCR, than cu will be distributed over depth based on that OCR. Or, you need to define layers with different void ratios.
David
Hi both,
Does this mean that the undrained shear strength can therefore be calculated for the hypoplastic model using the same formula for the MCC model:
Su=M/2 exp^(((Γ1e)/λ))
Cheers,
Hashmi
Just with a difference that in the oridnary Modified Cam clay normal compression lines are considered as linear in p vs 1+e plane, whereas hypoplastic model adopts Butterfield’s formulation with normal compression line linear in ln(1+e) vs ln p plane, so the equation needs to be updated accordingly. David