Hi Prof. David,
I have obtained these results in that attached picture using Triax and got confused when seeing that an isotopically normally consolidated sample does not follow a trend that looks similar to the traditional Roscoe Surface. Have I done something wrong or this is what is expected from your hypoplastic model?
Thank you,
Hashmi
Undrained Tests with Basic Clay Hypoplasticity
Related Articles
-
Calibration of Hypoplastic material model parameters
Amine Aboufirass||Constitutive Modelling|6 |Views 5,277
I would like to derive material parameters based for a simulation which will implement the hypoplastic material model based on the following information: • Heavily overconsolidated • Very dense, fine […] -
Automatic calibration software ExCalibre has been launched
David Mašín||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 5,615
On behalf of the team of developers I am happy to announce that, after more than four years of development and testing, ExCalibre has just been launched. ExCalibre is a […] -
VUMAT ABAQUS: sandy soil
hoang thai an||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 5,556
Dear PhD, I am studying roller vibrations on sandy soil models with vumat. Can PhD give me the subroutine model and input parameters of objects for reference? Unit of the […] -
Hardening soil Model UMAT
isma khabis||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 5,714
I have the hardening soil model in the UMAT format. However, when I run the code, it gives me this error as shown in the picture. I tried to make […] -
Cyclic Triaxial Test
Mehdi Joneidi||Constitutive Modelling|2 |Views 5,408
Dear All, I am using ISA+HP model in my research and I have encountered some problem when looking into cyclic triaxial test for single element. The target model was selected […] -
Shear Stiffness Calculation for Hypoplastic Model
Hashmi Sohawon||Constitutive Modelling|4 |Views 5,061
Hi David, I have reproduced some single elements test on ABAQUS using the UMAT to compare with Triax Hypoplasticity. So far, my stiffness curve (q vs ea) and my stress […] -
Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms
Francisco Mendez||Constitutive Modelling|3 |Views 4,914
I am happy to announce that our pre-print paper, “Calibration of the von Wolffersdorff model using Genetic Algorithms”, is available on researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342198062_Calibration_of_the_von_Wolffersdorff_model_using_Genetic_Algorithms. In this article, we propose a novel […] -
Suggestions for an Advanced Constitutive Model in FEM-Based Dynamic Slope Stability Analysis
zahras zahrasss||Constitutive Modelling|0 |Views 2,306
Dear colleagues, I am planning to conduct a dynamic stability analysis of a slope using the finite element method (FEM). I intend to implement the analysis through coding and utilize […]
Who is Online
No one is online right now
Search SoilModels Website
Recent posts
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS methon for LDFE analysis with hypoplastic 17.3.2025
-
Request for VUMAT Implementation of Mohr-Coulomb, Drucker-Prager, or Drucker-Prager Cap 28.2.2025
Recent Comments
- Ding Yan on Download package of a complete dataset “Karlsruhe Kaolin – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)”
- Arie Koot on mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface
- Arie Koot on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Amir F on Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software
- Nabanita Saha on set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat
- Nabanita Saha on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Tian Fapai on SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations
- Heng Wang on Multilaminate Model (Schädlich & Schweiger)
- Zhang Hongwei on Download Package of Charles University Implementation of High Cycle Accumulation Model
- Ruimin Chen on Problem with VUMAT interface
- Nitesh Bhume on UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p)
- Aleksandar Kostadinovic on Karlsruhe fine sand – Cyclic tests (T. Wichtmann)
- Amrane Moussa on Kadlíček, T., Ochmański, M., Mašín, D. and Duque, J. (2022) Report on Charles University implementation of high cycle accumulation model
- Ramon Varghese on SANISAND for FLAC3D Download
- Shuhan Cao on Hardening Soil or Hardening Soil-Small umat in Abaqus
- Kuikui Guigui on Hypoplastic Interface Model (Stutz et al., 2016)
- Kuikui Guigui on Download Package for Hypoplastic interface model and UMAT – FRIC interface
- Francisco José Mendez on Programme of the ALERT Olek Zienkiewicz school on Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials, February 3 to 7, 2025, Prague, Czech Republic







Dear Hashmi, this is correct response of the model. Actually, the observed shape of stress path is due to response envelopes being translated elipses in the stress space. The normally consolidated sample response can be corrected by either using intergranular strain concept, or by so-called D-dependent L approach. It is discussed thoroughly in this reference: Mašín, D. and Herle, I. (2007). Improvement of a hypoplastic model to predict clay behaviour under undrained conditions. Acta Geotechnica 2, No. 4, 261-268. Regards David
ok, thank you David.
Can you please provide a clarification on the following:
In triax program, the following are the inputs when using hypo_clay with istrain:
fi cr, lambda, kappa, N, r, R, mr, mt, betar, chi, e0
however, when referring to your notes, it says that for hypo_clay mR is replaced by Ag and ng while mT is supplemented by mrat instead. Therefore, how can i make triax recognise these input parameters: Ag, ng and mrat?
Correct, this is because hypo_clay is 2005 version of clay model. To use the most recent clay version, use hypo_clay_anisot and set anisotropy factor alpha_G = 1. Regards David
ok thank you. is there an updated pdf manual that includes the newer versions of hypo_clay models in triax that came after 2005?
I am currently using hypoplasti_clay_anisot_istrain, can you please confirm that the parameter nu is poisson’s ratio?
Hi David,
Can you please clarify the following parameters in Triax:
hypoplasti_clay_anisot_istrain: fi cr, lambda, kappa, N, nu, alpha, R, betar, chi, G0, n, mtrat, inic. his. var.: e0, istrain, pt
1. what is G0? confused that it could mean Ag or is it just initial shear stiffness?
2. is the n the same as ng?
3. what to insert for istrain and pt after e0? (i initially left them blank)
Thanks!
Hi Hashmi, G0=Ag, n=ng,
for istrain you should put all 9 components of complete intergranular strain tensor (row-by-row) with x being vertical coordinate, that is [isxx, isxy, isxz, isyx, isyy…]. For initial state, you probably want to set nine zeros.
for element test simulations, you will probably use pt=0, as you will not need to cope with near-zero stress problems occuring often in FE simulations. pt is arbitrary (you can leave it blank), but at least nine zeros for istrain (or your values if you know what you are doing) are important.