Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite wrong. Can someone help me with a clue please? ps. The Image Shows only two CIUP-REC, thats because i tried to detect my mistake
Shear modulus degragation 12.5.2022
FRIC code for clay hypoplasticity interface 23.4.2022
Hypo-umat sand 18.4.2022
Hypo-umat sand 18.4.2022
Using pore fluid-stress element in SandSand 9.4.2022
“Warning LNK4210” – hypoplastic clay UMAT 8.4.2022
Prague Geotechnical Days 2022 with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Cino Viggiani 7.4.2022
Micropiles load tests database 26.3.2022
DIANA 10.5 new features 10.3.2022
Input files for element tests for hypoplastic clay/sand UMAT 6.3.2022
Combining Hypoplastic-sand and Hypoplastic-clay in one UMAT file 2.3.2022
UMAT code for Unsaturated soil modes 19.2.2022
©2022 SoilModels
Hi Axel, in fact, your experimental results are quite untypical, as dilatancy starts from the very beginning of the shear experiments (normally, certain compression takes place first, as predicted by the model). I am not sure whether there could be some experimental issue in this but in any case I would consider predictions quite good, it would be probably quite hard to get better predictions using manual calibration. You can try to compare both sand and clay models to see the difference.
Thanks for your quick reply. Ich changed the signes because the template says that dilatancy should be negative. So after changing it the other way around I got still the same results. I was wondering, why it doesnt show anything in the strain chart?
It is undrained test, right? So volume strains are zero
That´s right. Thanks a lot
Kind regards