Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite wrong. Can someone help me with a clue please? ps. The Image Shows only two CIUP-REC, thats because i tried to detect my mistake
BCV bentonite experimental and modelling datasets 14.11.2023
Challenges in simulating geomechanical models using Mohr-Coulomb with Tension Cut-Off in Abaqus 20.10.2023
Analys soil liquefaction with Abaqus under blast load 19.10.2023
Hardening soil Model UMAT 13.9.2023
Problem with VUMAT interface 20.8.2023
UMAT and oneAPI compiler issues. (SOLVED…i hope :p) 5.8.2023
Oedometric Test Soil Test Plaxis 21.7.2023
Problem in simulating CPT using SANISAND04 10.7.2023
Problem with UMAT for clay hypoplasticity. Program exiting. 30.6.2023
Example of FLAC3D data file 10.6.2023
sigini ans sdvini subroutine example for soil model in Abaqus 6.6.2023
Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias 25.5.2023
©2023 SoilModels
Hi Axel, in fact, your experimental results are quite untypical, as dilatancy starts from the very beginning of the shear experiments (normally, certain compression takes place first, as predicted by the model). I am not sure whether there could be some experimental issue in this but in any case I would consider predictions quite good, it would be probably quite hard to get better predictions using manual calibration. You can try to compare both sand and clay models to see the difference.
Thanks for your quick reply. Ich changed the signes because the template says that dilatancy should be negative. So after changing it the other way around I got still the same results. I was wondering, why it doesnt show anything in the strain chart?
It is undrained test, right? So volume strains are zero
That´s right. Thanks a lot
Kind regards