Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite wrong. Can someone help me with a clue please? ps. The Image Shows only two CIUP-REC, thats because i tried to detect my mistake
A question about the hypoplastic model in clay 22.9.2022
A High-Cycle Accumulation Model for Sand (Niemunis et al., 2005) 6.9.2022
Malaysian kaolin – Cyclic tests by Charles University 5.9.2022
Problem in calculating Lateral displacement of the pile using Hypoplastic clay model 2.9.2022
GTS NX 25.7.2022
Special issue of Computers and Structures “Numerical simulation of multi‐physics phenomena in geotechnical structures” 25.7.2022
Post-doctorate position at Nantes University (France) in geotechnical analysis of mutualized anchors 6.7.2022
SIFEL – THM Model for Bentonite Barriers 27.6.2022
ABAQUS job doesn’t make any increment 22.6.2022
NorSand model for cyclic triaxial testing 9.6.2022
Post-doc position at Charles University in the field of THM analysis of unsaturated and heated soil cyclic loading 30.5.2022
Shear modulus degragation 12.5.2022
©2022 SoilModels
Hi Axel, in fact, your experimental results are quite untypical, as dilatancy starts from the very beginning of the shear experiments (normally, certain compression takes place first, as predicted by the model). I am not sure whether there could be some experimental issue in this but in any case I would consider predictions quite good, it would be probably quite hard to get better predictions using manual calibration. You can try to compare both sand and clay models to see the difference.
Thanks for your quick reply. Ich changed the signes because the template says that dilatancy should be negative. So after changing it the other way around I got still the same results. I was wondering, why it doesnt show anything in the strain chart?
It is undrained test, right? So volume strains are zero
That´s right. Thanks a lot
Kind regards