Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite wrong. Can someone help me with a clue please? ps. The Image Shows only two CIUP-REC, thats because i tried to detect my mistake
Hypoplastic Interface Model: Does anybody implemented this model in FLAC3D 31.7.2020
Question on implementation of sand hypoplastic model with Abaqus umat 28.7.2020
General questions on implementation of sand hypoplasticity model with Abaqus umat 23.7.2020
SANISAND 2008 model 23.7.2020
Question on the Matlab driver – model hypo Sand 20.7.2020
Animating Soil Models – eLearning Project 17.7.2020
PM4Silt software 12.7.2020
Factor of safety in Plaxis 3D using hypoplastic model for sand 9.7.2020
Post-doc position in energy geotechnics at Aarhus University 8.7.2020
ERROR Message when using UMAT_hcea with ABAQUS 3.7.2020
Slope stability calculation with hypoplasticity using phi-c reduction available now in download section 30.6.2020
SANICLAY-B (2018) how to calculate Dep 22.6.2020
©2020 SoilModels
Hi Axel, in fact, your experimental results are quite untypical, as dilatancy starts from the very beginning of the shear experiments (normally, certain compression takes place first, as predicted by the model). I am not sure whether there could be some experimental issue in this but in any case I would consider predictions quite good, it would be probably quite hard to get better predictions using manual calibration. You can try to compare both sand and clay models to see the difference.
Thanks for your quick reply. Ich changed the signes because the template says that dilatancy should be negative. So after changing it the other way around I got still the same results. I was wondering, why it doesnt show anything in the strain chart?
It is undrained test, right? So volume strains are zero
That´s right. Thanks a lot
Kind regards