Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite wrong. Can someone help me with a clue please? ps. The Image Shows only two CIUP-REC, thats because i tried to detect my mistake
boundary surface plasticity 20.1.2021
3 “STARS program” PhD positions related to soil mechanics open at Charles University 12.1.2021
Animating Soil Models – Animations as teaching and learning material for soil constitutive modeling 5.1.2021
Simulating the oedometric test with Abaqus 2.1.2021
SANISAND 2008 Model 29.12.2020
UMAT Implementation in Abaqus (Hypoplastic clay Subroutines) 28.12.2020
Issues on reading xlsx extension for calibration input data 21.12.2020
Issues in getting the negative values of q (mean deviatoric stress) while simulating cyclic triaxial test in ABAQUS using SANISAND subroutine. 19.12.2020
hypoplasticity model with Abaqus umat on Brno clay 16.12.2020
Animating Soil Models 15.12.2020
HP clay subroutine in Plaxis 30.10.2020
Modeling cyclic undrained sandy soil triaxial test using ABAQUS 27.10.2020
©2021 SoilModels
Hi Axel, in fact, your experimental results are quite untypical, as dilatancy starts from the very beginning of the shear experiments (normally, certain compression takes place first, as predicted by the model). I am not sure whether there could be some experimental issue in this but in any case I would consider predictions quite good, it would be probably quite hard to get better predictions using manual calibration. You can try to compare both sand and clay models to see the difference.
Thanks for your quick reply. Ich changed the signes because the template says that dilatancy should be negative. So after changing it the other way around I got still the same results. I was wondering, why it doesnt show anything in the strain chart?
It is undrained test, right? So volume strains are zero
That´s right. Thanks a lot
Kind regards