Hi, I wanted to ask if the variables/parameters defined in the online Hypoplastic model manual for PLAXIS (https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node6.html) are the same for the ABAQUS UMAT?
Tags: hypoclayRelated Articles
-
Hypoplastic Interface Model: Virtual Shear Zone Thickness and Surface Rougness Coefficient
Hello, I want to use Hypoplastic Interface (Fric Subroutine) in my ABAQUS contact models. However, I don’t know how I can determine Virtual Shear Zone Thickness. It is the Parameter […] -
Modelling TX monotonic compressive test with ABAQUS and SANISAND – not working
I am trying to reproduce a TX monotonic, compressive test on a sand by using a 1-element, axisymmetric ABAQUS FE model, assigned to a SANISAND material. For this purpose, I […] -
Hypoplasticity & Recent Stress History
Hi David, Can you please provide some comments on the ability of the Hypoplasticity model with intergranular strain concept to model the effects of recent stress history on the clay […] -
Looking for help
Hello guys. I just tried to calibrate on soilmodels. I´ve done three CIUP-REC-test plus one oedometric test. As you can see in the images, that there is still something quite […] -
CONSTUTUTIVE MODELLING
Can SANISAND version given in soil model work well for cyclic simple shear test ? -
Mohr Coulomb umat in Abaqus
Dear all, does anyone have the umat code for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus? For my current work I need a umat for Mohr Coulomb in Abaqus. It would be highly […] -
3D analysis with Basic Hypo-Plastic Model
Dear all Is the basic Hypo-Plastic model (Wollffersdorff’s model) suitable for 3D models? Can I analyze 3D models with this UMAT? (https://soilmodels.com/download/umat-hyposand-uibk/) Thank you Sobhan -
Compile triax calibration software under windows
1. Download install exe (32 or 64 bit) from https://cygwin.com/install.html 2. Choose a mirror site / click Next and select all packages you need for compiling: Type: “gcc” into search […]
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Presentations from Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 including 29th Prague Geotechical Lecture by Yannis Dafalias 25.5.2023
-
Problem in using Hypoplastic model for sand in Abaqus. 17.5.2023
-
An error in the SANISAND umat runtime 8.5.2023
-
Htypoplastic Model in Miidas GTS NX 25.4.2023
-
set cavitation limit in ABAQUS/STANDARD when using SANISAND umat 2.4.2023
-
FE formulation and software 25.3.2023
-
Multi-objective analysis of the Sand Hypoplasticity model calibration 24.3.2023
-
Problem with SANISAND UMAT 7.3.2023
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2023 (22nd – 23rd of May) with Prague Geotechnical Lecture by prof. Yannis Dafalias 28.2.2023
-
What is an appropriate damping model for dynamic liquefaction analysis of tailings storage facility in FLAC? 10.2.2023
-
Abaqus vs Plaxis – Local Convergence Tolerances 2.2.2023
-
Zbraslav sand – Cyclic tests by Charles University 17.1.2023
Dear Hashmi,
Basically yes, the most of the input you can see that it is identical if you check the subroutine: subroutine check_parms_h in the umat_hcea.for
Best regards,
Hans
Hi Hashmi, yes, they are.
Just for state variables you can use sdvini in Abaqus for their initialisation. But Plaxis way, that is initialisation through parameters, will be functional in Abaqus as well.
thank you for these info!