Hi, I wanted to ask if the variables/parameters defined in the online Hypoplastic model manual for PLAXIS (https://web.natur.cuni.cz/uhigug/masin/plaxumat/node6.html) are the same for the ABAQUS UMAT?
Tags: hypoclayRelated Articles
-
MSE walls design in Plaxis
Hi everyone, this is my first post in this forum. I am collecting initial data on the most appropriate soil model for the analysis of a multitiered MSE wall. I […] -
Compatibility of subroutines in ABQ2021
Hi Admin, I have been using hypoplastic subroutine supplied by this website. It works well in ABQ6.14 and ABQ2017. However, recently I have to upgrade to ABQ2021 due to an […] -
REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (REOI) FOR PROJECT IN CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING
Red Earth Engineering (REE) seeks expertise in computational mechanics and constitutive modelling in geotechnical engineering to undertake a consultancy project. The project aims to develop Python codes to solve the […] -
SANICLAY-B (2018) how to calculate Dep
Dear fellows, I have been working on coding SANICLAY-B model (2018) . Now I have one question in terms of this model. But I am stuck now. I have two […] -
General Questions Hypoplastic Umat on Abaqus
Hi all, After successfully testing a linear elastic Umat on Abaqus, I am now trying to test the Hypoplastic model Umat. I intend to carry out a drained triaxial single […] -
hypoplasticity umat filr
hello every one i have a problem with abaqus subroutine can i use hypoplastic umat file that prepared for palxis in this website in abaqus? or the files must be […] -
Triaxial compression test using Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus
Hello, everyone. I have encountered an issue during the simulation of triaxial compression of rocks using the perfectly elasto-plastic Mohr-Coulomb model in Abaqus. In my simulation, the stress-strain curve consists […] -
Supporting Organisations
Recent posts
-
Problem in “Hoek Brown Softening” Model 30.4.2026
-
XFEM Hydraulic Fracturing in Abaqus – Pore Pressure Not Updating & Extremely Small Time Steps 28.4.2026
-
Correct my Plaxis FEM simulation in foundation bearing capacity results 3.4.2026
-
mohr coulomb 2D yield surface vs 3D mohr coulomb yield surface 28.2.2026
-
Problem with GeoStudio (Seepage) software 16.2.2026
-
Prague Geotechnical Days 2026 3.2.2026
-
Postdoctoral position at COFS, UWA 28.7.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay in ABAQUS 23.7.2025
-
Drucker-Prager Cap 29.5.2025
-
Abaqus RITSS with hypoplastic 9.4.2025
-
Fellin UMAT subroutine 2.4.2025
-
Hypoplasticity clay for triaxial compression in abaqus 26.3.2025
Dear Hashmi,
Basically yes, the most of the input you can see that it is identical if you check the subroutine: subroutine check_parms_h in the umat_hcea.for
Best regards,
Hans
Hi Hashmi, yes, they are.
Just for state variables you can use sdvini in Abaqus for their initialisation. But Plaxis way, that is initialisation through parameters, will be functional in Abaqus as well.
thank you for these info!